The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Would random senators be better than elected?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:17 PM Author: Wine Plaza Aren't we just limiting ourselves by picking from the group of people who self-selected as "politicians"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991838) |
 |
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:19 PM Author: Vigorous nighttime jewess bill buckley had this idea, yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991855) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:20 PM Author: Wine Plaza Damn, I didn't run the full preemption check (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991866) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:21 PM Author: splenetic pit Ran here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991875) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:23 PM Author: Curious parlor antidepressant drug His brother was a senator:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_L._Buckley |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:25 PM Author: Vigorous nighttime jewess oh snap (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991925) |
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:21 PM Author: Vibrant saffron twinkling uncleanness associate test-based (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991876) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:23 PM Author: Wine Plaza Oh, without a doubt, any good merit system would prevail over elections. Then the difficulty is designing an acceptable merit system.
But I think it's arguable that even random would be preferable to elected. |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 5:25 PM Author: Wine Plaza Maybe merit tests for appointed positions/staffers and then randomly chosen pols. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27991922) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 7:50 PM Author: Aqua generalized bond death wish random would clearly be better, as the US Senate is now an oligarchy tightly selected and controlled by finance, corporates and AIPAC.
perhaps random among those with no police records and a positive net worth |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:03 PM Author: Vigorous nighttime jewess (raciss) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993105) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 7:52 PM Author: cobalt pervert most americans are retarded but yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993022) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:03 PM Author: Vigorous nighttime jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993106) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 7:56 PM Author: cerebral preventive strike factory reset button randoms would be bought up very quickly, you'd have to create some kind of ruling class immune to the appeals of commerce, so essentially aristocracy, who were just randoms chosen by birth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993058) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:00 PM Author: Shaky dark boltzmann fat ankles a civil service exam/promotion system would be best. provided it was actually objective and wasn't corrupted.
civil service promotion + limited terms = tcr. |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:01 PM Author: cerebral preventive strike factory reset button that just makes test makers into our gods (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993090) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:02 PM Author: Shaky dark boltzmann fat ankles that's preferable to what we have now. the british empire ran its colonies to some extent on this basis, and it worked well. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993101) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:03 PM Author: cerebral preventive strike factory reset button with disinterested third parties at the helm, a pure technocracy sounds unbearable, just faggot perfect rule following behavior endlessly rewarded (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993111) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:04 PM Author: Motley Cream Useless Brakes No. But appointed senators, as was originally intended, would be better than elected ones. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993116) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:08 PM Author: nudist gas station boiling water Have a laundry list of basic competence (IQ, no huge debt vs income, healthy, etc).
Select a few dozen or so for each office. Have people vote on the top hundred or so policy questions and have each answer them.
Have some debates.
Then let the people vote.
Pay those elected a few million bucks or so and then impose a special tax if they earn more than 300k/year afterwards to limit their ability to be bought or promised lobbyist jobs etc. |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:09 PM Author: twinkling becky (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993149) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:11 PM Author: Motley Cream Useless Brakes You have to have some basic competence with procedural shit. In many respects it is (or should be) a very practical job. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993165) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:15 PM Author: nudist gas station boiling water Sure, I guess, though we have aides and shit for that. I'm just spit balling here but I do agree with the thrust of the OP that full on Republican Democracy is kooky flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993199) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2015 8:12 PM Author: Aromatic filthy locus affirmative action probably (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2892580&forum_id=2#27993171) |