\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

SCOTUS to rehear Fisher v UTexas. Chances Scalia croaks by June'16?

If Kennedy croaks, the 4 conservaheroes can just gut AA for ...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
if Kennedy's final act of pwning reptiles was to retire this...
Beady-eyed free-loading mental disorder
  06/29/15
i hope they ban AA which is clearly and facially invalid by ...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
...
cerebral kink-friendly lettuce
  06/29/15
lol, liberals think that NOT having affirmative action is un...
sinister office
  06/29/15
in fairness that is not the claim they raised but that the b...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
political process argument is still a bitchmade hatred of de...
sinister office
  06/29/15
like all things it depends you dont want to let democracy...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
Just generally speaking, isn't it sort of silly to uphold a ...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
More generally, there's a conflict between disparate impact ...
cerebral kink-friendly lettuce
  06/29/15
Ricci v destefano. Disparate treatment is more obvious and m...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
If this were taken seriously, 99% of disparate impact claim...
cerebral kink-friendly lettuce
  06/29/15
Most DI claims fail. The FHA just preserved the status quo
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
Disparate impact needs to have its toenails ripped off, its ...
cerebral kink-friendly lettuce
  06/29/15
...
Floppy big-titted location
  06/30/15
I thought Kennedy was not an AAmo
Stirring stage national security agency
  06/29/15
What I'm saying is that if Kennedy croaks, it'll actually be...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
Goodwin is not getting on Scotus with the current senate. He...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
he is He was in dissent in Grutter and also overturned ...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
Is he actually drifting lib? Kennedy has ALWAYS been derange...
sinister office
  06/29/15
nah he definitely drifted lib. look at FHA and Alabama vo...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
Counterpoints: On Disparate Impact: Ricci v Destefano (he...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
He has been steadfast only with regard to racial discriminat...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
I think most libs would gladly accept an independent redistr...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
lol no they dont have shame now and will not accept anyth...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
Not going to go so far as to say you are wrong, but I think ...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
the religious cons dont care about AA and shit. they care ab...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
I don't know if you live in the south or not, but I can prom...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
i have never lived in the south except for a small amount of...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/29/15
Agreed, I don't think it's affirmative action specifically, ...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
Yeah, the VRA case alone makes up for his shitty marriage de...
Medicated dashing property
  06/29/15
nothing will ever redeem that fucking snake kennedy. there's...
Floppy big-titted location
  06/30/15
they're granting cert again and the original fisher decision...
Burgundy bespoke set
  06/29/15
so what do you expect
Bat shit crazy forum roast beef
  06/29/15
will either reverse on failure to narrowly tailor or send it...
Topaz boyish house liquid oxygen
  06/29/15
Will it spell out a clearer "method" of narrowly t...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
Kennedy's Fisher I was basically "strict scrutiny means...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  06/29/15
Bleeding-heart pinko commie shitlib here, I think AA is fuck...
irradiated painfully honest volcanic crater
  06/29/15
Agreed, makes more sense to do class-based affirmative actio...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
TITCR
irradiated painfully honest volcanic crater
  06/29/15
I guess the problem is that it would require passage of a ne...
Crystalline Arousing Private Investor
  06/29/15
...
Histrionic Violent Elastic Band
  06/23/16
is there any case that supports that SCOTUS's aff action rul...
Burgundy bespoke set
  06/29/15
frankly its not about the some 50 students getting admitted ...
Exciting plum goyim whorehouse
  06/30/15
I don't think any case reached that direct outcome, but Kenn...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  07/01/15
You guys can debate the math and the scholarship all you wan...
Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha
  07/01/15
...
Galvanic avocado kitty cat
  02/13/16
...
Histrionic Violent Elastic Band
  06/23/16
jfc
Dull Abnormal Stag Film Hominid
  06/23/16
omg
lemon adventurous hospital
  06/23/16
...
Wonderful Mustard Box Office
  06/23/16
...
Rebellious 180 pit
  06/23/16
enjoy your rbi visit
Shimmering library
  06/23/16
no surprise it's a degenerate quotemo that killed xo scalia....
Histrionic Violent Elastic Band
  06/23/16
Oh shit, what are tomorrow's lottery numbers?
Puce giraffe wagecucks
  06/23/16
...
Brindle sickened home
  06/23/16
...
Concupiscible misunderstood national kitty
  06/23/16
holy fuck
Jet-lagged Jade Den Toaster
  10/01/19
kek
Azure Base Useless Brakes
  10/08/19


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:34 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

If Kennedy croaks, the 4 conservaheroes can just gut AA for good by outvoting the libs 4-3. Kagan is recused again.

If Scalia croaks, then it comes down to Kennedy again to avoid a 4-4 tie.

Also, depends on how quickly the POTUS replaces him if he croaks by the end of 2015, which I hope doesnt happen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223693)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:55 PM
Author: Beady-eyed free-loading mental disorder

if Kennedy's final act of pwning reptiles was to retire this year, I would laugh heartily.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223903)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:37 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

i hope they ban AA which is clearly and facially invalid by 14th and lol at calling diversity a compelling state interest to overcome that bar



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223716)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:39 PM
Author: cerebral kink-friendly lettuce



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223728)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:40 PM
Author: sinister office

lol, liberals think that NOT having affirmative action is unconstitutional because of the 14th amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schuette_v._Coalition_to_Defend_Affirmative_Action

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223745)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:46 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

in fairness that is not the claim they raised but that the ban on AA through state referendum infringed minority rights by removing the decision on AA from educational institutions to the state government



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223818)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:47 PM
Author: sinister office

political process argument is still a bitchmade hatred of democracy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223833)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:54 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

like all things it depends

you dont want to let democracy decide by popular vote on every issue or right

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223893)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:54 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

Just generally speaking, isn't it sort of silly to uphold a popular vote restricting minority benefits?

Edit: Yeah, just saw your response.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223894)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:56 PM
Author: cerebral kink-friendly lettuce

More generally, there's a conflict between disparate impact and equal protection. Disparate impact requires discriminatory actions to be taken to remedy assumed discrimination.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224329)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:58 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

Ricci v destefano. Disparate treatment is more obvious and more disfavored than disparate impact

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224350)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 4:03 PM
Author: cerebral kink-friendly lettuce

If this were taken seriously, 99% of disparate impact claims would fail.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224390)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 4:07 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

Most DI claims fail. The FHA just preserved the status quo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224413)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 4:11 PM
Author: cerebral kink-friendly lettuce

Disparate impact needs to have its toenails ripped off, its eyeballs gouged out, and then it needs to be dropped into a vat of molten steel and shot into the sun.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224454)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 30th, 2015 12:15 AM
Author: Floppy big-titted location



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28227885)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:40 PM
Author: Stirring stage national security agency

I thought Kennedy was not an AAmo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223740)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:48 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

What I'm saying is that if Kennedy croaks, it'll actually be easier for the cons to write a strong opinion against AA, 4-3, since Kagan is recused.

But if Scalia croaks and is replaced by Goodwin Liu, LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223839)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:50 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

Goodwin is not getting on Scotus with the current senate. He couldnt for COA and senate will just blackball him for scotus. Obama will have to go somewhat moderate to win repub approval and it will probably be Mr. Turd from DC circuit though extreme liberals may not like it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223861)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:48 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

he is

He was in dissent in Grutter and also overturned COA in Fisher

Obviously he is drifitng lib so what know what he will do to this case

If he bans AA and severely restricts disparate impact that would more than balance the shitlib hack job he did in gay marriage

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223840)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:49 PM
Author: sinister office

Is he actually drifting lib? Kennedy has ALWAYS been deranged about anything related to gays.

His SSM opinion is the exact same as his lawrence decision. Same shitty reasoning.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223850)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:52 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

nah

he definitely drifted lib. look at FHA and Alabama voting rights case

In gay rights it is much more pronounced but he was pretty narrow in earlier decisions like Romers where they only applied rational basis review. its obvious though not explicitly written in the majority opinion for gay marriage that they consider gays a suspect class now subject to strict scrutiny

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223876)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 2:57 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

Counterpoints:

On Disparate Impact: Ricci v Destefano (he authored that opinion)

On VRA (Shelby)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223916)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:03 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

He has been steadfast only with regard to racial discrimination issues

Even there he is kind of softening as you can see from Alabama districting case

Libs want their cake and eat it too. Put too many blacks in one district to ensure they will have representation in state assembly das racisss. spread them out too much that they cant decide election das racisss too



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223962)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:08 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

I think most libs would gladly accept an independent redistricting commission in every state, regardless of the outcome of said redistricting.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28223996)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:11 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

lol no

they dont have shame now and will not accept anything that does not meet their racial dogma. first they will challenge the composition of panel as racist and if that fails the results as well

To see how racist they are just look at Schuette case where the black lawyer decided a black person should make the oral argument to speak for minorities and at the last minute made herself the lawyer for oral argument at SCOTUS. If some white guy tried this shit he would be screwed for life but nobody gave a shit bcos she was black

That is the kind of tribal identity politics played by liberals and lol at thinking they have any principles and will accept some independent redistricting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224013)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:25 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

Not going to go so far as to say you are wrong, but I think that an objective analysis would indicate that one political party can be trusted significantly less than the other. That's just relatively speaking, but still.

The whole thing about American cons is they generally have religious people on their side. That encourages a win by any means strategy, because they legitimately believe they are fighting for their own eternal salvation. There's nothing I can offer them in real life that can compete with that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224102)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:28 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

the religious cons dont care about AA and shit. they care about biblical issues - israel , gay marriage and crap like that

the religious extremists for racial issues are liberals - that is their religion and identity politics is their mantra

I have no problem with any race etc but only with this shitlib SJW agenda and tactics which basically made me more conservative

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224130)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:31 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

I don't know if you live in the south or not, but I can promise you that religion and racial discrimination are inextricably intertwined in that group.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224151)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:40 PM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

i have never lived in the south except for a small amount of time in Austin (is it even considered south??)

if you say so fine but i just don't see the baptist evangelicals getting riled up over AA like they do for gay marriage or israel

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224210)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:46 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

Agreed, I don't think it's affirmative action specifically, but racism/race issues definitely.

I think conservatives have done a good job of selling the religious argument to the media and general public. For most, it really is just a raw hatred though, and it's no different from that directed at blacks and hispanics.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224265)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:14 PM
Author: Medicated dashing property

Yeah, the VRA case alone makes up for his shitty marriage decision. That was really a BFD.

He also went to the right on the original ACA case. He even gave Roberts shit for going along with the libs.

Weird dude.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224022)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 30th, 2015 12:16 AM
Author: Floppy big-titted location

nothing will ever redeem that fucking snake kennedy. there's a special place in hell for that turd.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28227892)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:46 PM
Author: Burgundy bespoke set

they're granting cert again and the original fisher decision was pretty hostile to AA IIRC. unlikely they would do all that just to reaffirm bollinger.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224271)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:51 PM
Author: Bat shit crazy forum roast beef

so what do you expect

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224301)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:57 PM
Author: Topaz boyish house liquid oxygen

will either reverse on failure to narrowly tailor or send it back down for another analysis of narrow tailoring.

i predict the former.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224344)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 4:32 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

Will it spell out a clearer "method" of narrowly tailoring analysis than Fisher I?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224657)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 5:49 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28225137)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 3:57 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

Kennedy's Fisher I was basically "strict scrutiny means strict muthafucka, no deference to gov/universities/etc on whether their consideration of race is narrowly tailored to" diversity (a compelling interest but not when race is the predominant measure of diversity).

So no more Grutter-style "strict" scrutiny.

Strict scrutiny puts the burden on the univ to demonstrate at all times that they MUST consider race b/c no race-neutral alternatives are workable.

But still 2 Qs remain:

1. The cert grant most likely was Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito who all DESPISE AA. Could've been Kennedy too. Can the Cons convince Kennedy to go further than he did in Fisher 1?

2. What if Scalia croaks on Ragu and BHO replaces him w/ Goodwin/Sri/Katyal before June'16?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28224338)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 5:56 PM
Author: irradiated painfully honest volcanic crater

Bleeding-heart pinko commie shitlib here, I think AA is fucking terrible and hope it is found unconstitutional. The system as it currently stands does nothing but give wealthy blacks in good public and private schools a leg up in the college application process. It does not help the poor and truly disadvantaged - black or white - who have little access to academic resources and role models and rarely even apply to top-tier schools to begin with.

Go on, go to any fancy school in the US. Go to one of my Ivy alma maters. Look for a black person from a poor, disadvantaged background. Go on, do it! YOU WON'T FUCKING FIND ONE. Impoverished kids from the inner-city ghetto or from poor rural areas don't even know what the fuck a Dartmouth College is, or how they would apply to it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28225175)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 5:58 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

Agreed, makes more sense to do class-based affirmative action.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28225193)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 6:00 PM
Author: irradiated painfully honest volcanic crater

TITCR

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28225197)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 6:03 PM
Author: Crystalline Arousing Private Investor

I guess the problem is that it would require passage of a new law, state-by-state (with 39 Republican governors I believe). I can't immediately think of any way through the courts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28225218)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:25 AM
Author: Histrionic Violent Elastic Band



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770070)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2015 6:03 PM
Author: Burgundy bespoke set

is there any case that supports that SCOTUS's aff action ruling regarding a primarily STATE funded PUBLIC university would be extended to PRIVATE universities that receive FEDERAL research funds?

i've seen people on xo make that claim but never heard it substantiated. if SCOTUS just makes it slightly easier for non URMs to get into berkeley and UNC but things at stanford and yale stay the same, who really cares?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28225216)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 30th, 2015 12:22 AM
Author: Exciting plum goyim whorehouse

frankly its not about the some 50 students getting admitted into Berkeley or UNC when they should not have been. Its to stop SJW mission creep in its tracks before the whole racial identity politics in education/jobs picks up even more steam

you give shitlib mob one inch and before you know they are fckng u up the ass with no lube

regarding your actual question by now it is obvious it entirely depends on what kennedy thinks about it. it is not settled SCOTUS law by any means and probably will lead to a circuit split and then a SCOTUS cert

the closest i can think of is the solomon amendment ROTC case



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28227940)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2015 9:48 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

I don't think any case reached that direct outcome, but Kennedy's Ricci v. DeStefano basically ports over 14A Equal Protection jurisprudence into TitleVII.

And there are a lot of cases that say 14A jurisprudence & TitleVII & other federal schemes overlap with each other.

It'd be hard to say AA is unconstitutional discrimination under 14A, but all of a sudden, it no longer constitutes discrimination for the purposes of federal statute that bans discrimination.

Also, some people (the same person behind Fisher, actually) sued your alma mater, Harvard, directly, claiming that Harvard's consideration of race violates Title VI (6) because it gets federal funding.

And you have all the Dept of Ed: Civil Rights Office 'inquiries' into Harvard, Princeton, etc., for practicing AA. If TitleVI doesn't do what it says, it'd be none of the Dept of Ed's business.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28241694)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2015 9:54 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle olive ape alpha

You guys can debate the math and the scholarship all you want, but you know this cases hinges on 2 factors:

1. Whether Scalia is on the court come May/June 2016, or is replaced by Kamala Harris

2. Whether Kennedy is willing to undo more of Grutter. His Fisher I basically adopted his Grutter dissent on deference (i.e., "strict scrutiny must not be strict in theory but feeble in fact." Strict means strict, mofos).

But his Grutter dissent then goes on to actually do the narrow tailoring analysis, which Fisher 1 didn't do (it sent it back to 5th Cir to do it).

Fisher 1 does say that diversity is compelling, but race can't be the predominant or sole measure of diversity). And the Univ has the burden of proving no race-neutral alternatives are "workable" (e.g., Top10%, SES AA, etc), which is a really compact version of narrow tailoring analysis.

Seems like Fisher 2 might just go through with narrow tailoring. UNLESS Scalia croaks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#28241733)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 13th, 2016 6:07 PM
Author: Galvanic avocado kitty cat



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#29820933)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:22 AM
Author: Histrionic Violent Elastic Band



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770051)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:23 AM
Author: Dull Abnormal Stag Film Hominid

jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770053)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:24 AM
Author: lemon adventurous hospital

omg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770061)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:24 AM
Author: Wonderful Mustard Box Office



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770063)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:26 AM
Author: Rebellious 180 pit



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770074)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:28 AM
Author: Shimmering library

enjoy your rbi visit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770093)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:30 AM
Author: Histrionic Violent Elastic Band

no surprise it's a degenerate quotemo that killed xo scalia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770113)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:35 AM
Author: Puce giraffe wagecucks

Oh shit, what are tomorrow's lottery numbers?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770143)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:42 AM
Author: Brindle sickened home



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770190)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 23rd, 2016 10:45 AM
Author: Concupiscible misunderstood national kitty



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#30770213)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 1st, 2019 9:58 PM
Author: Jet-lagged Jade Den Toaster

holy fuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#38915869)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 8th, 2019 8:50 AM
Author: Azure Base Useless Brakes

kek

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2922502&forum_id=2#38946168)