The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Let's face it - This country & others were great cuz they were White & Christian
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 23rd, 2015 11:33 PM Author: garnet parlor A recipe for success, true around the world (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28400752) |
Date: July 23rd, 2015 11:52 PM Author: drab alcoholic theater stage (acemoglu) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28400887) |
 |
Date: July 23rd, 2015 11:56 PM Author: aquamarine principal's office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28400918) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:19 PM Author: Gay philosopher-king classic XO
how many ppl even got this?
lol |
|
Date: May 25th, 2018 11:10 PM Author: cracking piazza old irish cottage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#36129733) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:15 PM Author: garnet parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949387) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:16 PM Author: Awkward iridescent senate White, Christian *and* English-speaking (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949393) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:16 PM Author: aquamarine principal's office sprekensie deutsche? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949400) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:17 PM Author: garnet parlor you're going to need to defend this anti-German ignorant statement. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949403) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:18 PM Author: Awkward iridescent senate Thought we were only talking about the true greats. Germany obv a very good country. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949421) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:20 PM Author: Gay philosopher-king you realize except that British pulled ahead only after 1750 or so and until then HRE/France was running shit in the world in terms of culture/civilization
lol @ this english qualifier |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:23 PM Author: Awkward iridescent senate Too bad they fucked themselves with their silly revolutions, etc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949466) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:26 PM Author: Gay philosopher-king fine but i am just saying you cant deny that France/Germania had and have great civilization history and depending on when you start measuring the rankings among England/France/Germany would be scrambled. so all 3 would easily be part of OPs assertion
Infact if you think post WWII then Germany has pwned the fck out of English in terms of success
|
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:29 PM Author: Awkward iridescent senate I'm flaming for the most part, but I do think that the tradition of political stability, common law, incremental change, etc of England and its descendants are special. Also France and Germany didn't manage to spawn successful settler countries the way England did (which is unfortunate, I wish they had) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949508) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:34 PM Author: Gay philosopher-king England was not that much stable than HRE/France for most of history (look at succession wars etc). you seem to think history starts at around 1800. then lets look at post WWII where Germany has had only like 5 chancellors and basically better stability than England
regarding colonies you are right that english have a much better track record but they were a mercantile island which gave them some advantages over France/HRE. Also the most successful english colonies (AUS/NZ/CAN/USA) happened because they were new world territories populated by white europeans where as French and Germany didnt have that luxury of having new world colonies
Your argument falls apart when you look at places like Bangladesh/Pakistan (english colonies) which are SPS compared to Vietnam (french colony) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:43 PM Author: Awkward iridescent senate Agree with most of your points but it's silly to cherry pick colonies of populations of completely different culture/religion/IQ/resources/etc and compare them in any meaningful way (Vietnam vs Bangladesh, etc). UK had the most colonies so naturally many of them are shitty countries today, Many of the poorest and worst off African countries today were French, don't think it reflects much on them really. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949600) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:45 PM Author: Gay philosopher-king no the key factor was the ppl who lived in colonies and NOT who were the colonial masters. in fact this was the only factor to determine what happened in these ex-colonies
so all colonies with white europeans flourished while the rest went TTT.
so no point in giving major credit to British which is the point I was making. it was not because British had some secret sauce that France/Germany didnt have |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:48 PM Author: Awkward iridescent senate Being able to create successful white settler colonies was part of the British secret sauce. They were the only ones able to do it, not Spain, not France really, the Dutch came closest I guess. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949650) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2018 11:25 PM Author: Pea-brained sticky stage cuck LOL Germans are gook trash. Go back to asia, Ernst. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#36129812) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2015 11:36 PM Author: Fragrant space (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#28949550) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2018 11:09 PM Author: garnet parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#36129731) |
|
Date: May 25th, 2018 11:12 PM Author: Floppy purple business firm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2944537&forum_id=2#36129744) |