The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Legal scholar: "Stripping federal funding is a bill of attainder"
| frum appetizing brethren | 09/30/15 |
| misunderstood plaza | 09/30/15 |
| hyperventilating free-loading azn | 09/30/15 |
| Supple trump supporter jewess | 09/30/15 |
| slate blathering trust fund | 09/30/15 |
| frum appetizing brethren | 09/30/15 |
| flickering circlehead | 09/30/15 |
| Supple trump supporter jewess | 09/30/15 |
| Supple trump supporter jewess | 09/30/15 |
| Supple trump supporter jewess | 09/30/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 30th, 2015 2:21 PM Author: frum appetizing brethren http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20150928_Congress_violates_Constitution_with_Planned_Parenthood_vote.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869350) |
 |
Date: September 30th, 2015 2:22 PM Author: misunderstood plaza lol. btw not clicking (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869357) |
Date: September 30th, 2015 2:23 PM Author: hyperventilating free-loading azn David S. Cohen is a professor of law at the Thomas R. Kline School of Law at Drexel University and the author of "Living in the Crosshairs: The Untold Stories of Anti-Abortion Terrorism" (Oxford University Press)
|
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 3:50 PM Author: Supple trump supporter jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869935) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 2:24 PM Author: slate blathering trust fund Failure to fund PP is imposing a legislative penalty? There is a duty to fund PP? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869376) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 3:42 PM Author: frum appetizing brethren NOW THERE IS YOU BITCH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869887) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 3:39 PM Author: flickering circlehead Lol pure scholarship coming out of Philly I see (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869867) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 3:50 PM Author: Supple trump supporter jewess they tried this same shit with acron. some shitlib minority district judge accepted the argument before being GVR'd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869939) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 3:53 PM Author: Supple trump supporter jewess 12 On December 11, 2009, a district court in the Eastern District of New York held that the language in the Continuing Resolution that prohibited the provision of federal funds to ACORN was an unconstitutional bill of attainder, and enjoined the enforcement of the prohibitions. ACORN v. United States, 662 F. Supp. 2d 285 (E.D.N.Y. 2009). The decision was overturned by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which found no constitutional infirmity with the legislation. ACORN v. United States, 618 F.3d 125 (2d. Cir. 2010). |
|
Date: September 30th, 2015 3:54 PM Author: Supple trump supporter jewess For instance, there was, for a time, significant controversy about bonuses paid to employees of entities that had received Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds from the federal government under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.5 In response to this concern, various proposals were made to impose taxes on such bonuses. One such bill, which passed the House, would have taxed bonuses as income to the employee at a rate of 90%,6 while another, introduced in the Senate, would have imposed an excise tax equal to 35% of the bonus on both the employee and entity.7 Significantly, both bills would have applied retroactively to tax bonuses awarded before the legislation was passed.8 Concerns were expressed that, because these bills targeted the bonuses of employees of specific companies that had received funds, they could be seen as bills of attainder.9 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005054&forum_id=2#28869961) |