The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Cutting back on parenthetically defining parties. BOOMERS VERY APPREHENSIVE.
| Mahogany preventive strike | 10/01/15 |
| Mahogany preventive strike | 10/01/15 |
| High-end cumskin | 10/01/15 |
| Mahogany preventive strike | 10/01/15 |
| Aggressive razzle-dazzle national | 10/01/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 1st, 2015 3:32 PM Author: Mahogany preventive strike Unnecessary: Muddytaint Lawn Service, LLC ("Muddytaint") moves for an award of attorney's fees against Shlomo Goldwasser ("Goldwasser").
No one is going to get confused and there's not going to be any ambiguity if you start talking about Muddytaint and Goldwasser without parenthetically defining them in your brief.
But that makes the boomers uneasy. |
Date: October 1st, 2015 4:06 PM Author: Mahogany preventive strike Although I would like to see the use of parentheticals with respect to posters on occasion: The URBAN MEYER 8-4 JUGGERNAUT ("RSF"). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005912&forum_id=2#28877246) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2015 4:09 PM Author: High-end cumskin In their semi-defense, a lot of this shit can involve similarly named entities (e.g. Muddytaint Lawn Service Inc. Muddytaint Lawn Service, LLC, Muddytaint Lawn Service Holdings, etc.). However, if that's not an issue, then yeah it's pure boomer flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005912&forum_id=2#28877261) |
 |
Date: October 1st, 2015 4:11 PM Author: Mahogany preventive strike I'm ok with avoiding ambiguity. I just don't want to clutter things up if I don't have to. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005912&forum_id=2#28877280) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2015 4:11 PM Author: Aggressive razzle-dazzle national legal writing is soo ossified (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3005912&forum_id=2#28877278) |