\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

JUSTICE SCALIA IS INTELLECTUALLY DISINGENUOUS

An extreme example is the way in which some United States S...
Wild trip prole
  10/12/15
not really a lawbort anymore. get a new angle.
chartreuse goal in life
  10/12/15
what do you mean
flesh stag film friendly grandma
  10/12/15
pretty sure everyone here is in law school and getting drunk...
hideous church
  10/12/15
this has been my experience so far
flesh stag film friendly grandma
  10/12/15
...
dashing filthy business firm giraffe
  10/12/15
...
emerald weed whacker newt
  10/12/15
Tee eye tee see are! NOWAG FOR LIFE!
crimson adventurous french chef
  10/12/15
...
Wild trip prole
  02/13/16
Italians are not intellectuals.
180 Onyx Coldplay Fan Party Of The First Part
  10/12/15
They all are. HTH.
autistic chrome corner travel guidebook
  10/12/15
Yes, but Scalia is ITALIAN. That's a special kind of unintel...
180 Onyx Coldplay Fan Party Of The First Part
  10/13/15
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi
Lemon Floppy Telephone Trust Fund
  10/13/15
...
Wild trip prole
  10/14/15
who is a fan of breyer ITT>
Wild trip prole
  10/13/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 2:43 PM
Author: Wild trip prole

An extreme example is the way in which some United States Supreme Court Justices use the dictionary to interpret complex federal statutes. In his plurality opinion in Rapanos v United States (2006), Justice Scalia sought to determine the scope of federal regulatory power over wetlands under the Clean Water Act (1972) not by reference to the statute’s stated goal of maintaining ‘the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the

Nation’s waters’ (§1251(a)), but rather by reference to the definition of ‘waters’ found in the version of Webster’s New International Dictionary published in 1954. Instead of considering whether conditions in the relevant wetlands could affect the Great Lakes system just one mile away, the plurality opinion off ered an exegesis of such common hydrological terms as ‘streams’, ‘oceans’, ‘rivers’, ‘lakes’, ‘bodies of water’, ‘ditches’, channels’, and ‘moats’—the latter of obvious concern to a 20th-century statute seeking to prevent water pollution ( Rapanos , pp. 732–6)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28952157)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 3:48 PM
Author: chartreuse goal in life

not really a lawbort anymore. get a new angle.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28952470)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 8:04 PM
Author: flesh stag film friendly grandma

what do you mean

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28953717)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 8:05 PM
Author: hideous church

pretty sure everyone here is in law school and getting drunk in class constantly and raising their hands and yelling memes from the board and the professor laughs and awards them 180s and says see are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28953721)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 8:07 PM
Author: flesh stag film friendly grandma

this has been my experience so far

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28953737)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 8:09 PM
Author: dashing filthy business firm giraffe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28953755)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 10:27 PM
Author: emerald weed whacker newt



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28954762)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 8:09 PM
Author: crimson adventurous french chef

Tee eye tee see are!

NOWAG FOR LIFE!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28953753)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 13th, 2016 5:17 PM
Author: Wild trip prole



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#29820188)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 10:26 PM
Author: 180 Onyx Coldplay Fan Party Of The First Part

Italians are not intellectuals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28954751)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 12th, 2015 10:26 PM
Author: autistic chrome corner travel guidebook

They all are. HTH.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28954756)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 13th, 2015 7:13 AM
Author: 180 Onyx Coldplay Fan Party Of The First Part

Yes, but Scalia is ITALIAN. That's a special kind of unintellectual.

Italians are known for fashion, food, Ferraris, operas, and 1960s existential films -- not philosophy.

Swarthy, yes; brainy, no.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28956020)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 13th, 2015 8:13 AM
Author: Lemon Floppy Telephone Trust Fund
Subject: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28956060)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 14th, 2015 10:55 AM
Author: Wild trip prole



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28964523)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 13th, 2015 8:17 AM
Author: Wild trip prole

who is a fan of breyer ITT>

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3015103&forum_id=2#28956073)