Pryor Cashman LLP (New York, NY)

PHONE CALLS ALLOWED No COMPENSATION TYPE Weekly

Pryor Cashman LLP (New York, NY)

Employer Profile

DESCRIPTION

Unique opportunity to enjoy a high-quality, diverse litigation practice at Mid-Sized New York City law firm. Firm litigation practice includes complex commercial, intellectual property, real estate and business litigation. Firm seeks a class of 2011- 2013 associate with substantial litigation experience at a New York law firm. Excellent professional and academic credentials are required. Top tier law school and New York bar admission required. Top-notch research, analytical, writing and advocacy skills a must. Experience in real estate litigation, business litigation and/or “soft IP” litigation (media, copyright and trademark) is preferred, including motion practice, document analysis, drafting and responding to discovery and participating in depositions. The firm is a team-oriented, collegial environment, which encourages associates to take on responsibility to foster and expedite their development as litigators. The firm also encourages associates to be entrepreneurial in developing client relationships.

All inquiries are strictly confidential.

Pryor Cashman LLP seeks and encourages applicants from diverse personal and educational backgrounds. Pryor Cashman LLP is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

All associates are eligible for a limited bonus after billing 1,850 hours and a more substantial bonus if they bill 2,000 hours or more. Considerations affecting an associate’s bonus include, among other things, quality and timeliness of the associate’s work and non-billable time expended on pro bono matters, marketing, recruitment, and other firm matters.

We offer a competitive salary, commensurate with experience. Pryor Cashman's comprehensive benefits package includes:

Health Plans: Choose from a PPO or EPO health plan

Dental Plan: Choose from a PPO or DMO dental plan

Vision Plan

Life Insurance/AD&D

Short and Long Term Disability

Flexible Spending Accounts

401(k) Plan

Commuter Benefit Plan

EAP (Employee Assistance Program)

CONTACT INFORMATION

Employer: Pryor Cashman LLP (New York, NY)

Name: Mrs. Stephanie Fereaud

Title: Summer Associate Recruiting Manager

Address: 7 Times Square

New York, New York

10036

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29218324)

We offer a competitive salary, commensurate with experience. Pryor Cashman's comprehensive benefits package includes:

Health Plans: Choose from a PPO or EPO health plan

Dental Plan: Choose from a PPO or DMO dental plan

Vision Plan

Life Insurance/AD&D

Short and Long Term Disability

Flexible Spending Accounts

401(k) Plan

Commuter Benefit Plan

EAP (Employee Assistance Program)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29218330)

In deciding whether it may issue such an order, which of the following must the state court consider?

A. Whether medical treatment is necessary to save the baby's life

B. Whether the hospital is owned and operated by the state or privately owned.

C. Whether the mother's refusal to authorize medical treatment is justified on the basis of current medical knowledge.

D. Whether the mother is a taxpayer of the state in which the court is located

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29221839)

practice of their religious beliefs, a cat was required to be sacrificed to the glory of Satan after a live

dissection of the animal in which it endured frightful pain. In the course of such a religious sacrifice,

Defendant was arrested on the complaint of the local Humane Society and charged under a statute

punishing cruelty to animals.

On appeal, a conviction of Defendant probably will be

(A) sustained on the grounds that belief in or worship of Satan does not enjoy constitutional

protection.

(B) sustained on the grounds that sincere religious belief is not an adequate defense on these facts.

(C) overturned on the grounds that the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion and its

expression was violated.

(D) overturned on the grounds that the beliefs of the cult members in the need for the sacrifice might

be reasonable, and their act was religious.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29221850)

consecutive one-year contract. Under state law, he cannot acquire tenure until after five consecutive

annual contracts. In his third year, Plaintiff was notified that he was not being rehired for the following

year. Applicable state law and college rules did not require either a statement of reasons or a hearing, and

in fact neither was offered to Plaintiff.

Which of the following, if established, most strongly supports the college in refusing to give Plaintiff a

statement of reasons or an opportunity for a hearing?

(A) Plaintiff’s academic performance had been substandard.

(B) A speech he made that was critical of administration policies violated a college regulation

concerning teacher behavior.

(C) Plaintiff worked at the college for less than five years.

(D) Plaintiff could be replaced with a more competent teacher.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29221860)

federal bicycle registry. The purpose of the law is to provide reliable evidence of ownership to reduce

bicycle theft. No fee is charged for the registration. Although most stolen bicycles are kept or resold by

the thieves in the same cities in which the bicycles were stolen, an increasing number of bicycles are

being taken to cities in other states for resale.

Is this act of Congress constitutional?

(A) Yes, because Congress has the power to regulate property for the general welfare.

(B) Yes, because Congress could determine that in inseverable aggregates bicycle thefts affect

interstate commerce.

(C) No, because most stolen bicycles remain within the state in which they were stolen.

(D) No, because the registration of vehicles is a matter reserved to the states by the Tenth

Amendment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29221992)

practice of their religious beliefs, a cat was required to be sacrificed to the glory of Satan after a live

dissection of the animal in which it endured frightful pain. In the course of such a religious sacrifice,

Defendant was arrested on the complaint of the local Humane Society and charged under a statute

punishing cruelty to animals.

On appeal, a conviction of Defendant probably will be

(A) sustained on the grounds that belief in or worship of Satan does not enjoy constitutional

protection.

(B) sustained on the grounds that sincere religious belief is not an adequate defense on these facts.

(C) overturned on the grounds that the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion and its

expression was violated.

(D) overturned on the grounds that the beliefs of the cult members in the need for the sacrifice might

be reasonable, and their act was religious.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3049703&forum_id=2#29221906)