The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Reminder: Scalia called evolution a "myth"
| wine embarrassed to the bone indian lodge | 02/14/16 |
| floppy business firm | 02/14/16 |
| iridescent immigrant | 02/14/16 |
| fuchsia free-loading bbw den | 02/14/16 |
| Gay messiness | 02/14/16 |
| Razzle-dazzle Ticket Booth | 02/14/16 |
| Gay messiness | 02/14/16 |
| Razzle-dazzle Ticket Booth | 02/14/16 |
| wine embarrassed to the bone indian lodge | 02/14/16 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 14th, 2016 12:19 AM Author: wine embarrassed to the bone indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29824966) |
 |
Date: February 14th, 2016 12:46 PM Author: floppy business firm So if evolution were true, then the Nazis were correct in their ideology, since it was all based on evolution. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29827747) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: iridescent immigrant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29828058) |
Date: February 14th, 2016 1:08 PM Author: fuchsia free-loading bbw den a : a usually traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29827901) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2016 1:23 PM Author: Gay messiness To be fair, he actually used quotes around "myth" in that opinion. He was merely pointing out that evolution cannot be observed in a laboratory setting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29828026) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle Ticket Booth Link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29828053) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2016 1:32 PM Author: Gay messiness Sorry, he was literally actually just summarizing the testimony of a witness, ljl at dishonest shitlibs:
"Senator Keith and his witnesses testified essentially as set forth in the following numbered paragraphs:
...
(2) The body of scientific evidence supporting creation science is as strong as that supporting evolution. In fact, it may be stronger. Id. at E-214 (Young statement); id. at E-310 (Sen. Keith); id. at E-416 (Sen. Keith); 2 id. at E-492 (Sen. Keith). The evidence for evolution is far less compelling than we have been led to believe. Evolution is not a scientific "fact," since it cannot actually be observed in a laboratory. Rather, evolution is merely a scientific theory or "guess." 1 id. at E-20 - E-21 (Morris); id. at E-85 (Ward); id. at E-100 (Reiboldt); id. at E-328 - E-329 (Boudreaux); 2 id. at E-506 (Boudreaux). It is a very bad guess at that. The scientific problems with evolution are so serious that it could accurately be termed a "myth." 1 id. at E-85 (Ward); id. at E-92 - E-93 (Kalivoda); id. at E-95 - E-97 (Sen. Keith); id. at E-154 (Boudreaux paper); id. at E-329 (Boudreaux); id. at E-453 (Sen. Keith); 2 id. at E-505 - E-506 (Boudreaux); id. at E-516 (Young)."
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/case.html |
|
Date: February 14th, 2016 1:46 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle Ticket Booth Shocker! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29828193) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2016 3:49 PM Author: wine embarrassed to the bone indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3129995&forum_id=2#29829074) |