Is it ever too early to go in house?
| rambunctious national security agency yarmulke | 05/04/16 | | Indecent Sapphire Filthpig Twinkling Uncleanness | 05/04/16 | | lascivious house-broken useless brakes locus | 05/04/16 | | Fragrant buff stock car | 05/04/16 | | Fragrant buff stock car | 05/04/16 | | fishy whorehouse hairy legs | 05/08/16 | | Dark Box Office Weed Whacker | 05/04/16 | | Fragrant buff stock car | 05/04/16 | | diverse fanboi | 05/04/16 | | Anal national alpha | 05/04/16 | | Stirring tank den | 05/04/16 | | rambunctious national security agency yarmulke | 05/04/16 | | passionate charcoal native milk | 05/04/16 | | Stirring tank den | 05/06/16 | | rambunctious national security agency yarmulke | 05/06/16 | | bipolar market | 05/06/16 | | Coiffed silver orchestra pit | 05/08/16 | | rambunctious national security agency yarmulke | 05/08/16 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: May 6th, 2016 4:35 PM Author: Stirring tank den
I'd take it unless you're talking about a shitty company that may possibly close its doors soon or you hate the environment/city.
Not sure what you'll be doing, but you may pick up other skills that will prove useful once you bounce to another in-house gig. Much of in-house, if its a big company, is navigating the internal policies and procedures (e.g., approvals, deal reviews, etc) -- that can be incredibly frustrating and cumbersome, which is why in-house attys prefer fellow in-house attys. The work isn't as complex as some of the stuff you'd handle in private practice, but you'll be exposed to some unique things that you wouldn't have seen otherwise (e.g., dealing with the business people directly, etc).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3213946&forum_id=2#30422595) |
|
|