Why do Jews bring up irrelevant points in arguments to try to win
| light yarmulke piazza | 06/29/16 | | Milky Frozen Indian Lodge Really Tough Guy | 06/30/16 | | hairraiser flesh range | 06/29/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/29/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/29/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/29/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/29/16 | | Concupiscible french chef gaping | 06/29/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/29/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/30/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/30/16 | | appetizing keepsake machete home | 06/30/16 | | Bateful puce digit ratio | 06/30/16 | | charismatic olive pit | 06/30/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/30/16 | | dark talented public bath | 06/30/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/30/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/30/16 | | confused excitant school cafeteria trump supporter | 06/30/16 | | Bonkers Parlour Quadroon | 06/30/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 07/01/16 | | Well-lubricated wonderful meetinghouse travel guidebook | 06/30/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 06/30/16 | | cyan mischievous nursing home | 07/01/16 | | light yarmulke piazza | 07/01/16 | | Trip Harsh Factory Reset Button Depressive | 07/01/16 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 29th, 2016 10:53 PM Author: light yarmulke piazza
Jews bring up irrelevant points that don't harm the opponent's argument, and don't help their argument. They are just points that the Jew pushes so vehemently as to APPEAR to do some effect. The Jew then repeats the point (to establish importance) and raises his voice (to establish severity).
Then the Jew follows up with a question, usually in the form of: "so you're telling me X isn't important/significant?" Or "Really? X can just be ignored?"
DONT FALL PREY TO THESE TRICKS BY THE JEW
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3270866&forum_id=2#30821663) |
Date: July 1st, 2016 12:11 AM Author: cyan mischievous nursing home
They know their point is irrelevant to the argument but they also know that their opponent sees them pressing forward with it despite its irrelevance. This, their making an obvious show of the wish to play foul, is a time tested refutation tactic that works especially well when the point being reasoned, however relevant, is long and spun out. The intention is not merely to distract an opponent but to quickly deplete his powers of concentration by first angering him (by making an overt display of the wish to play foul), so he will burn off the maximum of his emotional energy faster, and secondly by siphoning off his mental reserves with, again, some long, spun out chain of reasoning on whatever topic happens to be handy, or some throwaway point. Aristotle discusses this tactic in his Elenchus, or Sophistical Refutations.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3270866&forum_id=2#30829134) |
|
|