\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Legal question. Friend tricked tattoo artist into signing over his store.

Friend brought in a really simple purchase contract all text...
flickering parlour indirect expression
  07/14/16
...
passionate ebony mother abode
  07/14/16
no. fraud/deception
heady onyx associate
  07/14/16
FIRST QUESTION WAS THERE A MEETING OF THE MINDS?
passionate ebony mother abode
  07/14/16
...
hairraiser persian locus
  01/21/17
There was no fraud and there is consideration (he paid for t...
flickering parlour indirect expression
  07/14/16
there is deception as evidence by OP's use of "tricked&...
heady onyx associate
  07/14/16
That is hearsay
flickering parlour indirect expression
  07/14/16
...
heady onyx associate
  07/14/16
Terms were reduced to writing in tattoo ink. Meets the statu...
Bonkers histrionic useless brakes center
  01/21/17
lol'd. Nice..hahaahha
Burgundy Halford
  07/14/16
...
flickering parlour indirect expression
  07/15/16
One | Weird | Trick
lilac party of the first part nursing home
  07/15/16
enforceable
house-broken giraffe base
  07/15/16
I agree, seems ironclad
flickering parlour indirect expression
  07/15/16
Can some legal knowers weigh in
flickering parlour indirect expression
  01/21/17
it's unconscionable
purple pontificating den
  01/21/17
Enforceable. There is no statute of limitations on a back ta...
Bonkers histrionic useless brakes center
  01/21/17
...
Bat-shit-crazy Buff School Cafeteria
  01/21/17
...
flickering parlour indirect expression
  01/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 4:50 PM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression

Friend brought in a really simple purchase contract all text and asked if the tattoo person (shop owner) could tattoo it on his back. The Dumbass did and "signed" his signature in tattoo ink too. Friend is now demanding the store be transferred to him this is legal right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928220)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 4:52 PM
Author: passionate ebony mother abode



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928229)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 4:53 PM
Author: heady onyx associate

no. fraud/deception

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928237)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 4:54 PM
Author: passionate ebony mother abode

FIRST QUESTION WAS THERE A MEETING OF THE MINDS?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928242)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:07 PM
Author: hairraiser persian locus



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426185)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 4:55 PM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression

There was no fraud and there is consideration (he paid for the tattoo)

Seems open and shut

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928247)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 5:04 PM
Author: heady onyx associate

there is deception as evidence by OP's use of "tricked"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928315)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 5:09 PM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression

That is hearsay

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928345)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 5:09 PM
Author: heady onyx associate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928347)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:18 PM
Author: Bonkers histrionic useless brakes center

Terms were reduced to writing in tattoo ink. Meets the statute of frauds breh.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426279)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 14th, 2016 4:54 PM
Author: Burgundy Halford

lol'd. Nice..hahaahha

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30928245)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 15th, 2016 2:29 AM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30933163)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 15th, 2016 2:30 AM
Author: lilac party of the first part nursing home

One | Weird | Trick

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30933165)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 15th, 2016 2:30 AM
Author: house-broken giraffe base

enforceable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30933167)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 15th, 2016 2:36 AM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression

I agree, seems ironclad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#30933182)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:06 PM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression

Can some legal knowers weigh in

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426179)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:08 PM
Author: purple pontificating den

it's unconscionable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426201)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:09 PM
Author: Bonkers histrionic useless brakes center

Enforceable. There is no statute of limitations on a back tattoo contract.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426204)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:15 PM
Author: Bat-shit-crazy Buff School Cafeteria



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426252)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 21st, 2017 4:20 PM
Author: flickering parlour indirect expression



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3285386&forum_id=2#32426301)