\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Possibly committed a legal ethics violation. How to handle?

i wrote a demand letter that could be argued as threatening ...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
send him a dick pick to show your COCK CONTROL
aphrodisiac transparent ticket booth digit ratio
  07/25/16
...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
Slide and let do
swollen jet-lagged dilemma psychic
  07/25/16
...
carnelian juggernaut main people
  07/25/16
Send followup clarifying what you meant and alleviating the ...
Lilac indecent becky
  07/25/16
this sounds CR.
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
...
charcoal chest-beating filthpig
  07/25/16
...
irradiated stage
  07/25/16
Why is this even unethical?
ivory step-uncle's house messiness
  07/25/16
i cited a criminal statute and advised them that the conduct...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
Did you not know that you couldn't do that
Razzmatazz Foreskin
  07/25/16
exactly
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
Write a conciliatory response letter stating that it's not w...
Razzmatazz Foreskin
  07/25/16
this is seems cr should i explain what i meant. say i was...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
http://rules.calbar.ca.gov/Rules/RulesofProfessionalConduct/...
Rusted Indirect Expression Crackhouse
  07/25/16
Doesn't look like he violated that rule.
citrine pocket flask forum
  07/25/16
unlikely, but see the part about it being interpreted as a v...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
paging Hillary Clinton
avocado national rigpig
  07/25/16
Obviously stfu and hope it blows over / goes unoticed, which...
Mind-boggling Deep Candlestick Maker
  07/25/16
and what if it doesnt.
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
Send a followup email saying "Sike. Takebacks allowed. ...
amethyst laser beams
  07/25/16
I believe it's psych, little brother.
Rusted Indirect Expression Crackhouse
  07/25/16
either one works bro
amethyst laser beams
  07/25/16
I once pointed out the other side's legal ethics violation o...
big iridescent shrine
  07/25/16
This is a well-worn spiral of faggotry that I have observed ...
Low-t copper national security agency circlehead
  07/25/16
Explain for a corp bro who forgot most of this shit 6 years ...
trip magical new version
  07/25/16
The rule was obviously created to stop gotcha games, lawyers...
big iridescent shrine
  07/25/16
Pointing out their client's criminal behavior is in no way a...
Cracking house puppy
  07/25/16
http://ethics.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DPwdoe...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
In many jurisdictions that is exactly what is meant by threa...
Razzmatazz Foreskin
  07/25/16
...
yellow station masturbator
  07/25/16
this
aphrodisiac transparent ticket booth digit ratio
  07/25/16
Just tell this guy you didn't mean it as a threat and tell h...
violent shivering reading party tattoo
  07/25/16


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 7:17 AM
Author: yellow station masturbator

i wrote a demand letter that could be argued as threatening criminal actions. other side said it's unethical. it isn't an actual threat, but could be construed as a 'veiled threat.' i just dont want the hassle and want to 'take it back.' what's the best way to CYA on this?

sending a letter explaining that it's not a threat and backing off of it?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31021972)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 3:17 PM
Author: aphrodisiac transparent ticket booth digit ratio

send him a dick pick to show your COCK CONTROL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31025113)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 3:26 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31025200)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:01 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023358)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:01 PM
Author: swollen jet-lagged dilemma psychic

Slide and let do

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023361)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 2:20 PM
Author: carnelian juggernaut main people



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31024632)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:03 PM
Author: Lilac indecent becky

Send followup clarifying what you meant and alleviating the concerns of opposing counsel.

This is not legal advice and we do not have an attorney-client relation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023371)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:23 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

this sounds CR.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023545)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:24 PM
Author: charcoal chest-beating filthpig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023549)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:40 PM
Author: irradiated stage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023672)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:22 PM
Author: ivory step-uncle's house messiness

Why is this even unethical?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023530)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:23 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

i cited a criminal statute and advised them that the conduct could be criminal.

i guess that could be construed as a "threat" of criminal proceedings as a way to gain advantage in a civil dispute.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023540)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:37 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Foreskin

Did you not know that you couldn't do that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023647)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:40 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

exactly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023671)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:44 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Foreskin

Write a conciliatory response letter stating that it's not what you intended but to the extent they interpret it that way let me be very clear that I am not threatening to use it for an improper purpose

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023717)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:56 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

this is seems cr

should i explain what i meant. say i was trying to educate them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023839)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:24 PM
Author: Rusted Indirect Expression Crackhouse

http://rules.calbar.ca.gov/Rules/RulesofProfessionalConduct/CurrentRules/Rule5100.aspx

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023551)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:43 PM
Author: citrine pocket flask forum

Doesn't look like he violated that rule.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023713)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:58 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

unlikely, but see the part about it being interpreted as a veiled threat.

http://ethics.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DPwdoeL4dAo%3D&tabid=842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023855)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:22 PM
Author: avocado national rigpig

paging Hillary Clinton

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023534)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:24 PM
Author: Mind-boggling Deep Candlestick Maker

Obviously stfu and hope it blows over / goes unoticed, which it probably will.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023555)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:34 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

and what if it doesnt.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023622)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:25 PM
Author: amethyst laser beams

Send a followup email saying "Sike. Takebacks allowed. We good?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023564)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:41 PM
Author: Rusted Indirect Expression Crackhouse

I believe it's psych, little brother.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023688)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:58 PM
Author: amethyst laser beams

either one works bro

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023860)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:43 PM
Author: big iridescent shrine

I once pointed out the other side's legal ethics violation only to have them tell me that pointing out their violation is itself a violation. Ljl clown world

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023709)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 3:19 PM
Author: Low-t copper national security agency circlehead

This is a well-worn spiral of faggotry that I have observed many times in many cases.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31025139)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 3:23 PM
Author: trip magical new version

Explain for a corp bro who forgot most of this shit 6 years ago.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31025179)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 3:29 PM
Author: big iridescent shrine

The rule was obviously created to stop gotcha games, lawyers using ethics violations to leverage better outcomes at the expense of clients, but it can lead to some lol letters

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31025236)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 12:57 PM
Author: Cracking house puppy

Pointing out their client's criminal behavior is in no way a "threat" to report them for legal gain. Fuck that defense attorney small-dick faggot for even bringing it up (unless you really did threaten).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31023852)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 1:58 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator

http://ethics.calbar.ca.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DPwdoeL4dAo%3D&tabid=842

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31024452)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 2:18 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Foreskin

In many jurisdictions that is exactly what is meant by threat to gain the upper hand in litigation which is prohibited by the rules. Definitely in my jdx

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31024608)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 2:52 PM
Author: yellow station masturbator



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31024909)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 2:20 PM
Author: aphrodisiac transparent ticket booth digit ratio

this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31024634)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2016 3:43 PM
Author: violent shivering reading party tattoo

Just tell this guy you didn't mean it as a threat and tell him to stop threatening you

This is not legal advice and we do not have an attorney-client relation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3299652&forum_id=2#31025360)