Over dissent, HELD: Ariz. Dept. of Ag. may approve identical cattle brands.
| White Rehab | 08/09/16 | | White Rehab | 08/09/16 | | balding hospital | 08/09/16 | | White Rehab | 08/09/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 08/10/16 | | White Rehab | 02/27/17 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 06/21/17 | | White Rehab | 08/10/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 08/10/16 | | racy jew forum | 08/10/16 | | rose office | 08/10/16 | | White Rehab | 08/10/16 | | insanely creepy sweet tailpipe | 08/04/17 | | Appetizing parlor shitlib | 08/10/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 08/10/16 | | Heady Puppy Nibblets | 09/12/16 | | Appetizing parlor shitlib | 08/10/16 | | White Rehab | 08/10/16 | | Jet-lagged crackhouse | 08/11/16 | | bright dilemma nowag | 10/18/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 08/10/16 | | White Rehab | 08/11/16 | | red menage | 12/24/23 | | White Rehab | 08/11/16 | | up-to-no-good electric furnace cuckoldry | 08/11/16 | | onyx persian gaping | 09/13/16 | | Lavender giraffe | 08/11/16 | | White Rehab | 03/10/17 | | poppy fiercely-loyal masturbator reading party | 08/11/16 | | White Rehab | 08/11/16 | | White Rehab | 08/12/16 | | shimmering slap-happy indian lodge | 03/06/17 | | White Rehab | 09/12/16 | | Jet-lagged crackhouse | 09/12/16 | | racy jew forum | 09/13/16 | | White Rehab | 09/13/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 09/12/16 | | Very tactful aromatic black woman candlestick maker | 09/12/16 | | fighting headpube | 09/12/16 | | Spectacular Rebellious Newt | 09/13/16 | | White Rehab | 02/27/17 | | Very tactful aromatic black woman candlestick maker | 09/12/16 | | White Rehab | 09/13/16 | | Overrated clown | 09/12/16 | | Exciting cobalt tanning salon | 09/13/16 | | White Rehab | 09/13/16 | | Heady Puppy Nibblets | 09/13/16 | | onyx persian gaping | 09/13/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 10/07/16 | | White Rehab | 10/07/16 | | White Rehab | 10/17/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 10/17/16 | | Pearly police squad theater stage | 10/18/16 | | orchid plaza | 03/06/17 | | White Rehab | 11/28/16 | | filthy doctorate dog poop | 11/28/16 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 12/16/16 | | White Rehab | 02/27/17 | | filthy doctorate dog poop | 02/27/17 | | White Rehab | 02/27/17 | | filthy doctorate dog poop | 02/27/17 | | White Rehab | 03/06/17 | | filthy doctorate dog poop | 03/06/17 | | glittery yellow lay fat ankles | 03/06/17 | | Narrow-minded principal's office | 03/06/17 | | Hilarious brunch | 03/06/17 | | White Rehab | 03/08/17 | | White Rehab | 03/10/17 | | glittery yellow lay fat ankles | 03/10/17 | | Offensive jet pit international law enforcement agency | 03/10/17 | | glittery yellow lay fat ankles | 03/10/17 | | White Rehab | 03/10/17 | | White Rehab | 05/24/17 | | White Rehab | 06/02/17 | | Free-loading stage | 06/02/17 | | bipolar garrison | 06/02/17 | | White Rehab | 06/02/17 | | bipolar garrison | 06/02/17 | | shimmering slap-happy indian lodge | 06/03/17 | | White Rehab | 06/21/17 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 06/21/17 | | White Rehab | 07/31/17 | | slate resort | 07/31/17 | | White Rehab | 08/03/17 | | White Rehab | 08/03/17 | | filthy doctorate dog poop | 08/03/17 | | Hilarious brunch | 08/03/17 | | White Rehab | 08/03/17 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 02/13/18 | | Heady Puppy Nibblets | 06/03/22 | | red menage | 12/24/23 | | White Rehab | 08/04/17 | | lilac spot indirect expression | 02/13/18 | | poppy fiercely-loyal masturbator reading party | 02/13/18 | | obsidian aggressive church kitty | 02/13/18 | | White Rehab | 06/03/22 | | White Rehab | 02/05/24 | | curious french shrine filthpig | 06/03/22 | | godawful stain box office | 07/11/22 | | godawful stain box office | 12/24/23 | | Beady-eyed blood rage | 12/24/23 | | red menage | 12/24/23 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 9th, 2016 3:53 PM Author: White Rehab
Stambaugh v. Butler, No. 1 CA-CV 14-0817 (Ariz. Ct. App. Aug 9, 2016)
http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2016/CV14-0817.pdf
FACTS: Dude who has a bar seven (-7) cattle brand placed on the left rib wants to take his beasts from California to Arizona. He asks the Arizona Department of Agriculture for permission. Another dude in Arizona with a bar seven cattle brand placed on the left hip objects, NO FUCKING WAY; THAT'S MINE. And the statute says you can't register two identical designs.
ISSUE: Does the law allow identical brands on different parts of the cow?
HELD: Yes. Despite statutory language providing that "[n]o two brands of the same design or figure shall be adopted or recorded," the Arizona Department of Agriculture may approve identical brands if the brands are registered to different locations on the animal.
DISSENT: You fools. The prohibition on having the same DESIGN is completely separate from the statutory language you rely on concerning the LOCATION the design is placed.
DEEP ANALYSIS: Dissents are rare in Arizona appellate cases, and they're usually right when a judge goes to the effort of writing one. Here, the majority bared its unscholarly motives when it was, like, "Yeah, but if we don't allow the same brand in different places, it might invalidate other brands, and that's bad." The California cattledood should have been told to come up with a different brand.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31144562)
|
Date: August 9th, 2016 3:55 PM Author: White Rehab
Don't say I never do anything for you.
This is cutting edge shit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31144575) |
|
Date: August 9th, 2016 4:15 PM Author: White Rehab
Beyond the pale.
Perhaps we should offer our services to petition for supreme court review.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31144712)
|
Date: August 10th, 2016 7:04 AM Author: Appetizing parlor shitlib
Majority: "Who gives a shit about the exact wording of the law as long as the function of telling the brands apart is served?"
Minority: "WTF? This is directly contradictory to the law."
tbf,the majority opinion seems more efficient in this case but represents quite a transfer of power to the court
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31150026) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2016 7:17 PM Author: White Rehab
JUSTICE FOR THE STAMBAUGH COWS!
Look at this jibberish:
"The ambiguity exists by virtue of the language of A.R.S. § 3-1261 and related statutes, read in context with each other. Accordingly, we must look, inter alia, to the Department’s longstanding construction of the statutes. *****To do otherwise might render invalid hundreds of brands the Department accepted for recording over the past several decades based on their owners’ promises to apply the brands in different locations than prior similar recorded brands were to be applied.***** "
What do the consequences of "do[ing] otherwise" have to do with the interpretive task at hand?
Nothing. That's what.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31154793)
|
|
Date: August 11th, 2016 12:19 AM Author: Jet-lagged crackhouse
also seems like appellate court fact-finding
and results driven reasoning
and an impermissible delegation of power to agency that exceeds plain statutory text
i mean wtf. wtf.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31156945) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2016 5:12 PM Author: White Rehab
http://bit.ly/2aRjSF7
Motions for reconsideration due by August 24, 2016.
Petitions for supreme court review due by September 8, 2016.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31170666) |
Date: September 12th, 2016 6:30 PM Author: White Rehab
Petition for review filed with Arizona Supreme Court.
http://bit.ly/2cms4Ke
May justice be done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31392299) |
Date: September 13th, 2016 7:44 PM Author: Heady Puppy Nibblets
this
is why we got into law
fuck this bullshit. this pisses me off so much.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31400584) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2016 6:49 PM Author: White Rehab
A petition for review was filed, but the supreme court only grants around 3.9% of petitions in civil cases, which is usually a bit under 20 cases per year. It's a long shot.
Right now, it's taking about four months for the supreme court to consider petitions for review, and then it takes a while for them to get around to issuing the order to grant or deny.
The state got an extension until October 28 to file its response to the petition. So I'd guess that the petition will be decided around April.
Here's the supreme court's docket: http://apps.supremecourt.az.gov/aacc/appella/ASC/CV/CV160217.PDF
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#31582282) |
Date: February 27th, 2017 4:47 PM Author: White Rehab
Petition for review GRANTED against all odds.
http://i.xomf.com/gspkr.png
May there be justice for Stambaugh's cows!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#32713763) |
Date: March 8th, 2017 12:33 PM Author: White Rehab
Oral argument video available here:
https://www.azcourts.gov/AZ-Supreme-Court/Live-Archived-Video
I haven't watched it yet to see whether things are looking good for the Stambaugh cows, but I did notice that I had to turn off some of my ad blocking to get the video to load correctly.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#32782045) |
|
Date: March 10th, 2017 1:12 AM Author: White Rehab
Thoughts on oral argument.
(1) The state's attorney was having a rough time, but he shut up one of the justices when the justice was, like, "Have you even seen branding?" and the lawyers was, like, "Motherfucker, I grew up on a ranch. I've done it. It's easy."
38:44 - context
39:09 - rancher-lawyer revealed
(2) On whole, I think things went better for Stambaugh's cows. May justice be done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#32795775) |
Date: March 10th, 2017 12:43 PM Author: White Rehab
For those following along, the caption is now Stambaugh v. Killian.
Be sure to update your Westlaw and Lexis alerts.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#32797775) |
Date: August 3rd, 2017 1:31 PM Author: White Rehab Subject: JUSTICE FOR THE STAMBAUGH CATTLE!
http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2017/CV160217PR.pdf
¶1 Arizona Revised Statute § 3-1261(B) provides that no two brands of the same design or figure shall be adopted or recorded. Nonetheless, the Arizona Department of Agriculture (“Department”) allowed Eureka Springs to record a “bar seven” brand (—7), even though it was identical to a previously recorded brand owned by David Stambaugh, because it was placed on a different location on the animals. We hold that the plain language of the statute precludes the Department from recording “two brands of the same design or figure” regardless of their location.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#33910822) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2022 8:28 PM Author: Heady Puppy Nibblets
this case has tortured me for almost six years and i didn't know this outcome
to be fair, it only felt like 2, maybe 3 years ago, but still
allahu akbar and God bless america!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3316554&forum_id=2#44622573)
|
|
|