The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Outrage over Kaepernick is textbook PC bullshit. thought cuckservatives hated PC
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:09 AM Author: Racy transparent new version (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31288176) |
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:49 AM Author: slimy filthy casino roommate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31288270) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:06 PM Author: Racy transparent new version (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289714) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:10 PM Author: chest-beating diverse piazza No the outrage is him playing this card as a blatant, craven attempt not to get cut (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289748) |
 |
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:29 PM Author: silver frum azn no, the outrage is not that subtle, the outraged people are low iq (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289881) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:31 PM Author: Spectacular flesh wrinkle personal credit line CR. you literally see hundreds of tweets like "B-BU-BUT why is the media going after Kaepernick and not Lochte ... Must be white privilege"
|
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:09 PM Author: silver frum azn exactly i was like are you fucking kidding me do you live in the fucking united states, media has blasting lochte for weeks on end (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290214) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:42 PM Author: Arousing snowy rigpig not even close (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289964) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:18 PM Author: mint native hissy fit i don't like kaepernick and this might be part of why he did it but this is certainly not why most people picking up the story are up in arms (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290291) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:12 PM Author: Vibrant pozpig BS. This isn't about kissing the flag's ass, it's about BLM and his attempt to set the deck for RATHHHHITHM when he's cut because he sucks now.
He has a $114M contract. I think this country has been just fine for him. |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:34 PM Author: Histrionic chapel It's not about him though. It's about him using his platform to defend the black people without the $114m contract. It would be very easy for him to say "well, I'm super rich so forget about everybody else's problems." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289909) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:24 PM Author: comical brunch Bullshit, his "sitting down" is an empty platitude.
If he REALLY wanted to use his platform, then he would've REFUSED TO PLAY FOOTBALL to drive his point home.
Or, I don't know, maybe donated millions to build a community center. |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 8:02 PM Author: Histrionic chapel he might have donated money, I don't know but the "he can't protest b/c he's rich" angle is dumb. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31293557) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 8:19 PM Author: fragrant half-breed space Why spend money on something that's just going to get burned down? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31293664) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 7:25 AM Author: Beady-eyed crystalline mental disorder cvs did it & they're a for-profit company (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31296663) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:21 PM Author: Spectacular flesh wrinkle personal credit line After libs crucified Curt Schilling over his "free speech", don't expect conservatives to ally with them on this issue. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. The fact is, most people only want "free speech for me, not thee." The same Hillsdale conservative-types who are praising UChicago probably wouldn't welcome a speech on campus from Caitlyn Jenner, Jon Stewart, etc. Very few of us truly are content neutral when it comes to protecting the spirit of free speech. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289815) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:24 PM Author: violet geriatric cruise ship prole I disagree. Free speech is among the very top issues where people are willing to put aside politics in service of a principle.
Even seemingly more-important shit like "the presumption of innocence" and "due process" gets more thrown away for political reasons when people read about a crime that infuriates them. |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:27 PM Author: Spectacular flesh wrinkle personal credit line very few people are principled and balanced when it comes to free speech. they may support the broad concept of "free speech," but when you start pressing them and asking specifics (e.g. do you support flag burning? hate speech? is the media too nosy? etc.), inconsistencies invariably arise. studies confirm this. and this is why we need content-neutral protections for controversial speech, including political speech, hate speech and even pornography. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289864) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:38 PM Author: violet geriatric cruise ship prole Yeah no shit; I took high-school social studies, as well. What I'm saying is that there's more broad agreement on what activities should be protected by free-speech principles that virtually any other, and there's more agreement on free speech in the U.S. than in most other western countries (rare given how pluralistic and conservative we are relative to, e.g., Norway).
For example, almost everyone opposes criminal sanctions for any kind of political speech. You might say "well no shit, but that's not a marginal situation," to which I'd reply that the fact that it's not marginal just shows how much respect there is for the principle.
Compare this to the 2d Amendment, which is basically politically disputed down to its core (same with SDP, obviously), the 4th Amendment, where the "if you have nothing to hide, why do you care" argument still has a ton of traction, the 8th Amendment, where a great many people (probably a majority of the South) believe that we should try to inflict suffering onto those who've committed crimes. (I'm not just talking about the Amendments themselves here, but the broader principles they encompass; I'm using the amendments as a shorthand.)
Americans care deeply about free speech. And judges care near-universally, unlike with the other examples I gave. |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:45 PM Author: Arousing snowy rigpig chung is right and you are wrong (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289987) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 8:04 PM Author: sick vivacious pit go easy on him, man. he seems like a bit of a shut-in. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31293572) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:25 PM Author: Beady-eyed crystalline mental disorder except libs are now saying the anthem itself is offensive & not politically correct (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289850) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:28 PM Author: chest-beating diverse piazza (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289870) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:30 PM Author: swashbuckling yapping temple why would you think cuckservatives hate PC shit? is it Opposite Day? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289889) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:32 PM Author: erotic digit ratio kitchen mainstream conservatives are huge PC nutjobs actually (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289900) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:37 PM Author: passionate carnelian home becky what "outrage" ? the media is celebrating him as AN hero (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289932) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:43 PM Author: Violent antidepressant drug It's because he's a DIRTY fucking MUSLIM. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31289971) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:46 PM Author: ivory gunner Here's why it offends me as a free-speech loving conservative:
1. His conclusions are based on bad facts. There is NOT an epidemic of white racist police murdering unarmed black men. Police are more likely to use deadly force against a threatening white than a black. These bad facts are not simple error, either, they are part of a campaign of deceit by enemies of America. It's not someone dumb who thinks the earth is flat, its someone famous telling kids the earth is flat. Bad facts are always offensive because the truth is an absolute good.
2. Even if he had good facts, which point to the conclusion that racist white police murdering blacks is a VERY rare occurrence, and less of a national problem than shark attacks, he might still justifiably champion it as his cause celebre. Hell, even one such incident is indeed one too many. Im fine with any celebrity choosing shark attacks or unjustified murder of blacks or whatever. But to opt out of the national religion because of this pet cause is just terrible salesmanship. It's pouting, basically. I don't think he should be silenced. But I think he should be dealt with as a pouting child.
3. Finally, because we have a scarcity of time and resources, its actually harmful to black Americans to divert attention from real issues that actually affect them. How many unarmed black men were murdered by racist white cops this year? How many black kids were sired and then abandoned by their fathers? If you had fifteen minutes at the megaphone, which should you address? |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 12:59 PM Author: Arousing snowy rigpig bullshit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290122) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:03 PM Author: Talking Public Bath Police killing stats show that BLM is based in BS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290155) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:09 PM Author: Arousing snowy rigpig sure, which has fuckall to do with people having a problem with kaepernick's action (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290208) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:12 PM Author: Talking Public Bath I think mr reich was talking about why it pissed him off It's why it pisses me off too |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 8:17 PM Author: Vigorous Ladyboy Goyim (illiterate retard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31293657) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 8:21 PM Author: Arousing snowy rigpig poor wittle outraged pussy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31293680) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:01 PM Author: Talking Public Bath (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290140) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 12:46 PM Author: opaque turdskin tattoo you're being a pearl-clutching PC retard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31298097) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:00 PM Author: Talking Public Bath Has anyone told him that blacks aren't anymore likely to be unarmed and killed by police than whites are? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290133) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:07 PM Author: chest-beating diverse piazza The party of science does 't like your study so it will ignore it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290193) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 1:08 PM Author: light electric furnace newt hate kap but OP flamed and trolled a ton of bros in this thread LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31290199) |
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 7:58 PM Author: Flickering Jet-lagged Generalized Bond I think Kaep is pretty dopey in general
And I think this is a pretty dopey stand to make
But this is America, if he wants to make a dopey stand, that's his right
And to their credit, his employers have reiterated that this is his right to do
|
|
Date: August 29th, 2016 8:14 PM Author: Ebony dragon Still not sure what the national anthem has to do with the police. "Protesting" the entire country in general seems pretty fucking stupid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31293638) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 8:21 AM Author: bistre yarmulke (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31296771) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 7:36 AM Author: Mildly autistic roast beef Here's what I don't understand about the leftist "free speech" support for Kaepernick, who is questioning his right to do this? The left has made very, very clear that the only 1st amendment protection anyone gets is a narrow freedom of prosecution from the state for such speech and that doesn't seem to be at issue at all here.
I'm an ardent free speech supporter. I think Kaepernick's protest is stupid and the post above noting the bad facts is a major reason why. That said, I don't think this should impact his career. Much like I didn't think:
- The kids at Oklahoma should have been suspended for a racist chant. - The Mozilla CEO should be removed because he gave money to an anti-gay marriage PAC years ago. - Any school should cancel its graduation speaker because they took non-lib stances. - Any other number of scenarios where a lib lynch mob went after someone for not falling into the progressive, PC, lib agenda. |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 8:13 AM Author: Flickering Jet-lagged Generalized Bond yeah, the contrast between these situations is pretty stark
guess maybe that shows the power of the media to further the lib agenda? idk |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 8:42 AM Author: Ebony dragon It's completely laughable and normal people are going to start to revolt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31296823) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2016 12:48 PM Author: electric bespoke doctorate He should've given conservatives a trigger warning before he expressed an un-PC opinion. Right wing SJWs are terrible. Hate them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3335258&forum_id=2#31298103) |