proles work. many are republicans and don't buy the democrat party line about taxing the wealthy

the ones to blame for this are the dems, of all shades, colors, and wealth levels

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820408)

https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4070/4673548817_eb28641025_b.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31735517)

And if you are not a baby boomer https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-18a61ddc0a3c3fa2563f2393d271770e?convert_to_webp=true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31735566)

https://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/3207-Whittier-Blvd-90023/home/6943102

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820442)

envelope is sealed now, lol @ u

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31735674)

California students, schools and colleges can’t afford to go back to the days of massive teacher and staff layoffs, larger class sizes, and cuts to programs like art and music, and the state should protect essential services. Proposition 55 does not raise taxes on anyone; it simply maintains the current income tax rates on the wealthiest Californians. Prop. 55 prevents $4 billion in funding cuts to public education and protects other vital services, like children’s health care. Money goes to local schools and the Legislature can’t touch it. Prop. 55 contains strict accountability requirements to ensure funds designated for education go to classrooms, not to bureaucracy or administrative costs.

http://www.protectingcalifornia.com/about

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820375)

Proposition 55 Protects our Students and Public Schools from Returning to the Days of Massive Budget Cuts, Educator Layoffs, Larger Classes and Tuition Hikes

California public school funding was cut to the bone during the recession, forcing more than 30,000 teacher layoffs, huge class sizes, and the elimination of programs like music and art that make our kids well-rounded. Public schools and colleges are just starting to come back from these cuts, and unless we pass Prop. 55 to maintain the current income tax rates on the wealthiest Californians, our schools will lose $4 billion a year.

Furthermore, California is facing a severe teacher shortage. There is a need to hire more than 22,000 teachers next year alone, and there is still a need to hire education support professionals like library aides, bus drivers and custodians.

Funding from Prop. 55 will give local school districts the money they need to hire quality teachers and school employees, and to reduce class sizes.

Furthermore, Prop. 55 will help keep tuition rates stable and make more classes available to California’s

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820389)

Privacy Policy Contact Us

Paid for by Yes on 55 - Californians for Budget Stability, Sponsored by Teachers, Health Care Providers, Doctors and Labor Organizations. Major funding by California Hospitals Committee on Issues, (CHCI) Sponsored by California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems (CAHHS) and California Teachers Association/Issues PAC (committee).

Site by Trilogy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820399)

Here's an idea, why don't we create a different tax bracket for people earing $1 mm, $5 mm, and $10 mm per year and keep going up? End this myth that a big lawyer who can't afford a house in California is the same as a CEO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820388)

If you're a couple making 500K+, we're coming for you!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820514)

So pretty ignorant to say its "a lot" of money. These are not people with 2nd or 3rd homes. They are people who have 0 homes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820559)

1) How much is this person taking home after taxes?

2) Student loans for education that put this person in a position to cop a $250k jerb

3) LA cost of living, including rent and car stuff

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31823881)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820591)

As an aside, I think it makes perfect sense for CA to have higher taxes than the rest of the country. It really is an amazing state for natural beauty and weather and that it worth something to me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820560)

A government shouldn't get to decide how much of your income to take because the weather is nice or there is great scenery closely. It should be to provide necessary public goods and serve the common welfare. Period

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820583)

Just happy to live in a deep blue state that's as close to a Scandinavian socialist country as you could find in the US (except for maybe Vermont). Can't wait to legally go smoke some blunts and chill at the beach before heading off to my 250k in-house 9-5 job.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820670)

of course, that bullshit definition would make no sense as applied to you so you should have been able to figure that out on your own

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31822000)

a better argument would be that it's more like a small country so it has to provide more services but even then

donate money to an environmental cause if you want to, lol @ trusting the gov to use your money wisely

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820638)

L,JL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31820651)

I don't mind raising taxes on the $800k+ folks as well as the SV and Hollywood wealth, but $250k families are still very vulnerable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3400057&forum_id=2#31823835)