The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
actual legal scholarship needed -- suit to end Birthright Citizenship
| Motley theater | 11/29/16 |
| Racy wine state roast beef | 11/29/16 |
| Exciting nibblets | 11/29/16 |
| ebony excitant rehab foreskin | 11/29/16 |
| Exciting nibblets | 11/29/16 |
| Racy wine state roast beef | 11/29/16 |
| concupiscible up-to-no-good wrinkle mad-dog skullcap | 11/29/16 |
| Exciting nibblets | 11/29/16 |
| Exciting nibblets | 11/29/16 |
| Clear Vivacious Step-uncle's House | 11/29/16 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 29th, 2016 4:51 PM Author: Motley theater How would someone go about this? TYIA! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32017290) |
Date: November 29th, 2016 4:53 PM Author: Racy wine state roast beef Would be an amendment, not a lawsuit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32017297) |
 |
Date: November 29th, 2016 5:06 PM Author: Exciting nibblets idk what about a suit that sez the citizenship clause---("All persons born or naturalized in the United States[ ] ... are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside")---is purely _retrospective_? That is, it refers to persons then living, not ne1 born in the US going forward.
Would make sense as an historical matter. |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 5:12 PM Author: ebony excitant rehab foreskin Fantastic argument (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32017504) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 5:13 PM Author: Exciting nibblets thank. i'm sure there's some detailed lr article making it somewhere (PREEMPTION CHECK!) i came up w/ it by looking @ the language & using the power of motivated reasoning. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32017517) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 5:17 PM Author: Racy wine state roast beef scholarship! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32017541) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 6:31 PM Author: concupiscible up-to-no-good wrinkle mad-dog skullcap so they are always and forever citizens of the state where they resided at the time this was enacted? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32018027) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 6:39 PM Author: Exciting nibblets No - where do you get that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32018088) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 5:04 PM Author: Exciting nibblets just need reps to take control of a few moar states he he he (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3444170&forum_id=2#32017413) |
|
Date: November 29th, 2016 5:16 PM Author: Clear Vivacious Step-uncle's House To at least stop future anchor babies, Congress needs to pass something similar to this proposed bill introduced in 2015:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/140/text
Pro-immigration groups would challenge it under US v. Wong Kim Ark, and SCOTUS (with Trump's new appointment) could re-examine the case and find that it shouldn't be extended to children of illegal immigrants.
That's a start at least. But the Constitution needs to be amended to do away with birthright citizenship entirely. |