The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
how come firms don't match 401ks?
| Hyperactive Bbw Sex Offender | 12/05/16 |
| Laughsome violet incel | 12/05/16 |
| vivacious big-titted address corn cake | 12/05/16 |
| onyx fluffy principal's office | 12/05/16 |
| sable area | 12/05/16 |
| Magenta property striped hyena | 12/05/16 |
| Stirring Khaki Casino | 12/05/16 |
| dark domesticated party of the first part | 12/05/16 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:38 AM Author: Hyperactive Bbw Sex Offender i vaguely recall some issue about paying highly compensated employees and others in a non-discriminatory manner. but is it that? is that just a bogus excuse?
in-house now and the company has a pretty generous company match (100% of first 5% of salary)... goes up gradually to 200% match of the next 3% over the first 5 years of employment) means that in two years my 401k balance is already more than it was at like 3 years of maxing it at a firm. and it'll can keep climbing even more quickly.
i don't think i appreciated how significant a benefit it was. hard to get enough savings together even maxing a 401k at a firm. but with company match, i'll have a pretty sweet retirement and don't have to worry as much about specifically saving above and beyond. |
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:43 AM Author: Laughsome violet incel no idea, and i've often argued (to no avail) that firms should offer better 401K plans. if not matching, then at least allow after-tax contributions to permit the mega-backdoor Roth.
i will say that 90% of my biglaw colleagues that i talked to about 401Ks had virtually no interest in it, and some didn't even contribute to it. |
 |
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:46 AM Author: vivacious big-titted address corn cake i gave up contributing to it. tax-free money for now that i can't touch till i'm 65 where it will then be taxed is not the most intriguing benefit to me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3449490&forum_id=2#32058787) |
|
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:48 AM Author: onyx fluffy principal's office its also exempt from BK when you hit the downward spiral (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3449490&forum_id=2#32058792) |
|
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:44 AM Author: sable area why is 401k such a big deal? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3449490&forum_id=2#32058781) |
|
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:48 AM Author: Magenta property striped hyena (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3449490&forum_id=2#32058790) |
|
Date: December 5th, 2016 12:57 AM Author: Stirring Khaki Casino there are limits on contributions or the percent of contributions that highly compensated employees can get under a 401k plan. idk the details, but that's at least somewhat legit. i'm also willing to bet that the biglaw geniuses could figure out a way to throw associates some retirement cash if they wanted. three guesses the rea$on$ they don't do that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3449490&forum_id=2#32058807) |
|
Date: December 5th, 2016 1:09 AM Author: dark domesticated party of the first part Why would a firm start offering matching 401ks right now? Thats thousands of dollars that they can advertise as a "benefit" and which will get very little publicity.
It has much more recruiting value for them to give that $ out as bonus or salary increase. |