\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: ...
arousing startled really tough guy jew
  12/23/16
Because REASONS
Startling buff base
  12/23/16
he disqualified himself
maroon idea he suggested
  12/23/16
...
idiotic indirect expression corn cake
  12/23/16
"no person holding any office of profit or trust under ...
hot gay hall fanboi
  12/23/16
I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this
Painfully honest bright newt scourge upon the earth
  12/23/16
...
cobalt brunch crotch
  12/23/16
she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as So...
Passionate Azn Stage
  12/23/16
lolno especially not if you also look at what Bill and th...
Painfully honest bright newt scourge upon the earth
  12/23/16
i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline ...
Passionate Azn Stage
  12/23/16
no, I don't think that's what they're saying
Mind-boggling Elite International Law Enforcement Agency
  12/23/16
The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and...
Passionate Azn Stage
  12/23/16
"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind what...
Passionate Azn Stage
  12/23/16
How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?
mustard degenerate library
  12/23/16
Nbd just starting a conversation
cobalt brunch crotch
  12/23/16
Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton found...
dashing menage
  12/23/16
they did an end run around this by changing her job at State...
Painfully honest bright newt scourge upon the earth
  12/23/16
...
beady-eyed depressive
  12/23/16
...
provocative gas station death wish
  01/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: arousing startled really tough guy jew

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.

There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.

People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: Startling buff base

Because REASONS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211895)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: maroon idea he suggested

he disqualified himself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211894)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:39 AM
Author: idiotic indirect expression corn cake



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212186)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: hot gay hall fanboi

"no person holding any office of profit or trust under them" - wait, so shitlibs are saying that this means that no government employee may have any business interests at all?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211904)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:03 AM
Author: Painfully honest bright newt scourge upon the earth

I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211919)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:11 AM
Author: cobalt brunch crotch



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212003)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:12 AM
Author: Passionate Azn Stage

she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as SoS, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212016)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: Painfully honest bright newt scourge upon the earth

lolno

especially not if you also look at what Bill and their "foundation" were pocketing while she was SOS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212054)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:47 AM
Author: Passionate Azn Stage

i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline or something like that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212220)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: Mind-boggling Elite International Law Enforcement Agency

no, I don't think that's what they're saying

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211924)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Passionate Azn Stage

The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and has no backup for Tribe's conclusion so he just says "the better view" or "the best view" or something like that. He's a hack and this is a hack argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212027)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:10 AM
Author: Passionate Azn Stage

"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever ..."

it's obvious that ordinary business interests isn't what this clause was getting at. George Washington was an active businessman and entrepreneur throughout his presidency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211993)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: mustard degenerate library

How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211930)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: cobalt brunch crotch

Nbd just starting a conversation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212032)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: dashing menage

Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton foundation at the same time as State?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212047)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:44 AM
Author: Painfully honest bright newt scourge upon the earth

they did an end run around this by changing her job at State to some sort of phony "consultant" arrangement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212204)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:51 AM
Author: beady-eyed depressive



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212239)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2018 6:36 PM
Author: provocative gas station death wish



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#35198850)