The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United
| anal box office | 12/23/16 | | Mahogany stirring theatre degenerate | 12/23/16 | | Thriller Zippy Stain State | 12/23/16 | | duck-like vengeful sanctuary bbw | 12/23/16 | | rough-skinned clown | 12/23/16 | | snowy insane forum rigpig | 12/23/16 | | excitant arrogant field | 12/23/16 | | disturbing dashing indian lodge | 12/23/16 | | snowy insane forum rigpig | 12/23/16 | | disturbing dashing indian lodge | 12/23/16 | | avocado abode dysfunction | 12/23/16 | | disturbing dashing indian lodge | 12/23/16 | | disturbing dashing indian lodge | 12/23/16 | | demanding idiotic area stock car | 12/23/16 | | excitant arrogant field | 12/23/16 | | adventurous rebellious organic girlfriend | 12/23/16 | | snowy insane forum rigpig | 12/23/16 | | Purple Plaza Cuckold | 12/23/16 | | Frozen institution | 01/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM Author: anal box office
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.
There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.
People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884) |
|
|