\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: ...
Rose razzmatazz kitchen windowlicker
  12/23/16
Because REASONS
impressive garnet garrison
  12/23/16
he disqualified himself
amethyst black woman box office
  12/23/16
...
Carmine dilemma
  12/23/16
"no person holding any office of profit or trust under ...
Canary Space Gunner
  12/23/16
I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this
cordovan misanthropic lettuce
  12/23/16
...
Ungodly Temple Puppy
  12/23/16
she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as So...
Overrated Parlor Dog Poop
  12/23/16
lolno especially not if you also look at what Bill and th...
cordovan misanthropic lettuce
  12/23/16
i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline ...
Overrated Parlor Dog Poop
  12/23/16
no, I don't think that's what they're saying
appetizing low-t orchestra pit foreskin
  12/23/16
The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and...
Overrated Parlor Dog Poop
  12/23/16
"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind what...
Overrated Parlor Dog Poop
  12/23/16
How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?
pea-brained public bath
  12/23/16
Nbd just starting a conversation
Ungodly Temple Puppy
  12/23/16
Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton found...
irate address idiot
  12/23/16
they did an end run around this by changing her job at State...
cordovan misanthropic lettuce
  12/23/16
...
Bateful Coiffed Haunted Graveyard
  12/23/16
...
Idiotic theater degenerate
  01/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: Rose razzmatazz kitchen windowlicker

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.

There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.

People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: impressive garnet garrison

Because REASONS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211895)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: amethyst black woman box office

he disqualified himself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211894)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:39 AM
Author: Carmine dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212186)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: Canary Space Gunner

"no person holding any office of profit or trust under them" - wait, so shitlibs are saying that this means that no government employee may have any business interests at all?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211904)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:03 AM
Author: cordovan misanthropic lettuce

I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211919)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:11 AM
Author: Ungodly Temple Puppy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212003)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:12 AM
Author: Overrated Parlor Dog Poop

she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as SoS, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212016)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: cordovan misanthropic lettuce

lolno

especially not if you also look at what Bill and their "foundation" were pocketing while she was SOS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212054)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:47 AM
Author: Overrated Parlor Dog Poop

i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline or something like that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212220)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: appetizing low-t orchestra pit foreskin

no, I don't think that's what they're saying

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211924)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Overrated Parlor Dog Poop

The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and has no backup for Tribe's conclusion so he just says "the better view" or "the best view" or something like that. He's a hack and this is a hack argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212027)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:10 AM
Author: Overrated Parlor Dog Poop

"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever ..."

it's obvious that ordinary business interests isn't what this clause was getting at. George Washington was an active businessman and entrepreneur throughout his presidency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211993)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: pea-brained public bath

How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211930)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Ungodly Temple Puppy

Nbd just starting a conversation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212032)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: irate address idiot

Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton foundation at the same time as State?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212047)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:44 AM
Author: cordovan misanthropic lettuce

they did an end run around this by changing her job at State to some sort of phony "consultant" arrangement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212204)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:51 AM
Author: Bateful Coiffed Haunted Graveyard



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212239)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2018 6:36 PM
Author: Idiotic theater degenerate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#35198850)