\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: ...
Floppy codepig skinny woman
  12/23/16
Because REASONS
Honey-headed spot partner
  12/23/16
he disqualified himself
Appetizing foreskin
  12/23/16
...
mewling rehab
  12/23/16
"no person holding any office of profit or trust under ...
deep dilemma liquid oxygen
  12/23/16
I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this
180 territorial mother whorehouse
  12/23/16
...
cruel-hearted beady-eyed plaza quadroon
  12/23/16
she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as So...
Heady Property Degenerate
  12/23/16
lolno especially not if you also look at what Bill and th...
180 territorial mother whorehouse
  12/23/16
i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline ...
Heady Property Degenerate
  12/23/16
no, I don't think that's what they're saying
Titillating Vermilion Location Sandwich
  12/23/16
The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and...
Heady Property Degenerate
  12/23/16
"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind what...
Heady Property Degenerate
  12/23/16
How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?
supple maize crackhouse mad-dog skullcap
  12/23/16
Nbd just starting a conversation
cruel-hearted beady-eyed plaza quadroon
  12/23/16
Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton found...
passionate iridescent national
  12/23/16
they did an end run around this by changing her job at State...
180 territorial mother whorehouse
  12/23/16
...
Brilliant Lascivious Tanning Salon Ape
  12/23/16
...
Purple Self-absorbed Bawdyhouse
  01/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: Floppy codepig skinny woman

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.

There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.

People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: Honey-headed spot partner

Because REASONS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211895)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: Appetizing foreskin

he disqualified himself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211894)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:39 AM
Author: mewling rehab



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212186)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: deep dilemma liquid oxygen

"no person holding any office of profit or trust under them" - wait, so shitlibs are saying that this means that no government employee may have any business interests at all?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211904)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:03 AM
Author: 180 territorial mother whorehouse

I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211919)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:11 AM
Author: cruel-hearted beady-eyed plaza quadroon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212003)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:12 AM
Author: Heady Property Degenerate

she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as SoS, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212016)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: 180 territorial mother whorehouse

lolno

especially not if you also look at what Bill and their "foundation" were pocketing while she was SOS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212054)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:47 AM
Author: Heady Property Degenerate

i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline or something like that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212220)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: Titillating Vermilion Location Sandwich

no, I don't think that's what they're saying

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211924)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Heady Property Degenerate

The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and has no backup for Tribe's conclusion so he just says "the better view" or "the best view" or something like that. He's a hack and this is a hack argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212027)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:10 AM
Author: Heady Property Degenerate

"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever ..."

it's obvious that ordinary business interests isn't what this clause was getting at. George Washington was an active businessman and entrepreneur throughout his presidency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211993)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: supple maize crackhouse mad-dog skullcap

How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211930)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: cruel-hearted beady-eyed plaza quadroon

Nbd just starting a conversation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212032)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: passionate iridescent national

Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton foundation at the same time as State?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212047)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:44 AM
Author: 180 territorial mother whorehouse

they did an end run around this by changing her job at State to some sort of phony "consultant" arrangement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212204)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:51 AM
Author: Brilliant Lascivious Tanning Salon Ape



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212239)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2018 6:36 PM
Author: Purple Self-absorbed Bawdyhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#35198850)