The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United
| hideous swashbuckling bawdyhouse | 12/23/16 | | Ultramarine haunted graveyard | 12/23/16 | | fear-inspiring passionate patrolman | 12/23/16 | | Floppy Shivering Pit | 12/23/16 | | turquoise hateful casino | 12/23/16 | | bearded magenta school cafeteria deer antler | 12/23/16 | | Glittery round eye area | 12/23/16 | | Nudist talented dysfunction | 12/23/16 | | bearded magenta school cafeteria deer antler | 12/23/16 | | Nudist talented dysfunction | 12/23/16 | | clear sinister plaza masturbator | 12/23/16 | | Nudist talented dysfunction | 12/23/16 | | Nudist talented dysfunction | 12/23/16 | | Pink Potus | 12/23/16 | | Glittery round eye area | 12/23/16 | | Snowy state party of the first part | 12/23/16 | | bearded magenta school cafeteria deer antler | 12/23/16 | | Silver Kitchen Dog Poop | 12/23/16 | | Irradiated Sienna Forum Gay Wizard | 01/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM Author: hideous swashbuckling bawdyhouse
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.
There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.
People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884) |
|
|