The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United
| Hyperventilating claret halford stain | 12/23/16 | | rusted multi-billionaire | 12/23/16 | | Maroon Impertinent Milk | 12/23/16 | | violent stage weed whacker | 12/23/16 | | tripping peach factory reset button | 12/23/16 | | coiffed becky university | 12/23/16 | | Poppy Double Fault | 12/23/16 | | Thriller bespoke school cafeteria | 12/23/16 | | coiffed becky university | 12/23/16 | | Thriller bespoke school cafeteria | 12/23/16 | | wine sticky gay wizard | 12/23/16 | | Thriller bespoke school cafeteria | 12/23/16 | | Thriller bespoke school cafeteria | 12/23/16 | | motley toilet seat | 12/23/16 | | Poppy Double Fault | 12/23/16 | | ivory comical queen of the night | 12/23/16 | | coiffed becky university | 12/23/16 | | Electric Wagecucks Ladyboy | 12/23/16 | | Abnormal den cumskin | 01/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM Author: Hyperventilating claret halford stain
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.
There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.
People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884) |
|
|