AUSA trial ability is HIGHLY OVERRATED
| razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Canary chapel boiling water | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Canary chapel boiling water | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | Offensive deranged antidepressant drug trump supporter | 02/24/17 | | thirsty rough-skinned multi-billionaire | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Chocolate laser beams base | 02/24/17 | | lemon nursing home | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Offensive deranged antidepressant drug trump supporter | 02/24/17 | | Canary chapel boiling water | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Chocolate laser beams base | 02/24/17 | | Irradiated Persian Legal Warrant | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | lemon nursing home | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | lemon nursing home | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Offensive deranged antidepressant drug trump supporter | 02/24/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/24/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/24/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/24/17 | | Wild orange address | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | lemon nursing home | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Wild orange address | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | Wild orange address | 02/23/17 | | Irradiated Persian Legal Warrant | 02/23/17 | | Wild orange address | 02/23/17 | | Irradiated Persian Legal Warrant | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Wild orange address | 02/24/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Wild orange address | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | razzle-dazzle national | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | soggy son of senegal lodge | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | soggy son of senegal lodge | 02/23/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/23/17 | | soggy son of senegal lodge | 02/23/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/23/17 | | soggy son of senegal lodge | 02/24/17 | | Puce roommate | 02/24/17 | | soggy son of senegal lodge | 02/24/17 | | Racy Drunken Abode | 02/24/17 | | soggy son of senegal lodge | 02/24/17 | | Nighttime blood rage theater | 03/08/17 | | gold corner | 02/24/17 | | pontificating feces piazza | 02/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:07 PM Author: Racy Drunken Abode
several comments:
1) lol @ mock trial, moot court, and debate equating raw talent. most people who have lots of experience doing that shit are unlikeable douchebags who would be terrible trial lawyers.
2) biglaw associates who do have raw talent for trial skills often will get weeded out of biglaw before they ever have a chance to shine as a trial lawyer. they'll either hate biglaw, or not be good at it. it's rare that someone is a natural trial lawyer, and a great comma checker.
3) experience matters tremendously in trials, where just pretending like you know what you're doing is half the battle
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688581) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:10 PM Author: Racy Drunken Abode
not credited at all.
ALL jury trials are full of proles.
ive done several patent jury trials, and im sure this is the case with any other biglaw lit case. juries dont understand and of this bullshit. it's all which lawyer they like more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688604) |
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:14 PM Author: Irradiated Persian Legal Warrant
Cases with overwhelming evidence settle. If not, then defense counsel sucked, or the defendant was irrational, or both.
AUSA's are successful because judges refuse to hold them to heightened ethical standards governing prosecutorial conduct. Even when they commit egregious Brady violations, most cuck judges refuse to even directly name the government attorneys in their opinions.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688624)
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:16 PM Author: Wild orange address
AUSA trial experience isn't overrated because it's not very highly valued. Biglaw firms only hire AUSAs from SDNY/EDNY/NDIL/NDCA/CDCA and a few others. Obviously the "trial experience" in those districts is no more legit than anywhere else, where biglaw firms don't hire from.
They hire from those districts because those AUSAs have connections with how those offices do their investigations, the judges in those districts, and other AUSAs still at the office, and biglaw can sell this to clients as crucially relevant insider experience.
Their experience is being used to flame clients to get business.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688635) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:52 PM Author: Irradiated Persian Legal Warrant
(guy in that worked in flyover country with a huge chip on his shoulder)
Uhhhh, bigger cases get filed in NYC/DC/CHI because that is literally where the targets and/or companies that committed the bad acts are located. Have you worked in both types of jurisdictions to compare?
RMBS didn't happen because the legal theories were SPS, attenuated, and non-existant. Which is why everyone was pumping and dumping them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688901)
|
|
Date: February 24th, 2017 7:23 AM Author: Wild orange address
Uhhhh no as rakoff has pointed out the SNDY spends the vast majority of its time on insider trading cases because they're easy as fuck:
"While I want to stress again that I have no inside information, as a former chief of that unit I would venture to guess that the cases involving the financial crisis were parceled out to assistant US attorneys who were also responsible for insider-trading cases. Which do you think an assistant would devote most of her attention to: an insider-trading case that was already nearly ready to go to indictment and that might lead to a high-visibility trial, or a financial crisis case that was just getting started, would take years to complete, and had no guarantee of even leading to an indictment? Of course, she would put her energy into the insider-trading case, and if she was lucky, it would go to trial, she would win, and, in some cases, she would then take a job with a large law firm. And in the process, the financial fraud case would get lost in the shuffle."
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/01/09/financial-crisis-why-no-executive-prosecutions/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32689732) |
|
|