AUSA trial ability is HIGHLY OVERRATED
| beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Titillating locus | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Titillating locus | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | adventurous iridescent parlor | 02/24/17 | | misanthropic point codepig | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Topaz spot brethren | 02/24/17 | | Chartreuse forum puppy | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | adventurous iridescent parlor | 02/24/17 | | Titillating locus | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Topaz spot brethren | 02/24/17 | | internet-worthy mexican | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Chartreuse forum puppy | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Chartreuse forum puppy | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | adventurous iridescent parlor | 02/24/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/24/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/24/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/24/17 | | soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | Chartreuse forum puppy | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard | 02/23/17 | | internet-worthy mexican | 02/23/17 | | soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard | 02/23/17 | | internet-worthy mexican | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard | 02/24/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | beady-eyed foreskin | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | vigorous jet knife tattoo | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | vigorous jet knife tattoo | 02/23/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/23/17 | | vigorous jet knife tattoo | 02/23/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/23/17 | | vigorous jet knife tattoo | 02/24/17 | | Disturbing balding pit | 02/24/17 | | vigorous jet knife tattoo | 02/24/17 | | Aromatic French Chad | 02/24/17 | | vigorous jet knife tattoo | 02/24/17 | | Misunderstood smoky pozpig station | 03/08/17 | | Nudist office turdskin | 02/24/17 | | Orange Vibrant Digit Ratio | 02/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:07 PM Author: Aromatic French Chad
several comments:
1) lol @ mock trial, moot court, and debate equating raw talent. most people who have lots of experience doing that shit are unlikeable douchebags who would be terrible trial lawyers.
2) biglaw associates who do have raw talent for trial skills often will get weeded out of biglaw before they ever have a chance to shine as a trial lawyer. they'll either hate biglaw, or not be good at it. it's rare that someone is a natural trial lawyer, and a great comma checker.
3) experience matters tremendously in trials, where just pretending like you know what you're doing is half the battle
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688581) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:10 PM Author: Aromatic French Chad
not credited at all.
ALL jury trials are full of proles.
ive done several patent jury trials, and im sure this is the case with any other biglaw lit case. juries dont understand and of this bullshit. it's all which lawyer they like more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688604) |
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:14 PM Author: internet-worthy mexican
Cases with overwhelming evidence settle. If not, then defense counsel sucked, or the defendant was irrational, or both.
AUSA's are successful because judges refuse to hold them to heightened ethical standards governing prosecutorial conduct. Even when they commit egregious Brady violations, most cuck judges refuse to even directly name the government attorneys in their opinions.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688624)
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:16 PM Author: soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard
AUSA trial experience isn't overrated because it's not very highly valued. Biglaw firms only hire AUSAs from SDNY/EDNY/NDIL/NDCA/CDCA and a few others. Obviously the "trial experience" in those districts is no more legit than anywhere else, where biglaw firms don't hire from.
They hire from those districts because those AUSAs have connections with how those offices do their investigations, the judges in those districts, and other AUSAs still at the office, and biglaw can sell this to clients as crucially relevant insider experience.
Their experience is being used to flame clients to get business.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688635) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2017 11:52 PM Author: internet-worthy mexican
(guy in that worked in flyover country with a huge chip on his shoulder)
Uhhhh, bigger cases get filed in NYC/DC/CHI because that is literally where the targets and/or companies that committed the bad acts are located. Have you worked in both types of jurisdictions to compare?
RMBS didn't happen because the legal theories were SPS, attenuated, and non-existant. Which is why everyone was pumping and dumping them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32688901)
|
|
Date: February 24th, 2017 7:23 AM Author: soul-stirring hateful haunted graveyard
Uhhhh no as rakoff has pointed out the SNDY spends the vast majority of its time on insider trading cases because they're easy as fuck:
"While I want to stress again that I have no inside information, as a former chief of that unit I would venture to guess that the cases involving the financial crisis were parceled out to assistant US attorneys who were also responsible for insider-trading cases. Which do you think an assistant would devote most of her attention to: an insider-trading case that was already nearly ready to go to indictment and that might lead to a high-visibility trial, or a financial crisis case that was just getting started, would take years to complete, and had no guarantee of even leading to an indictment? Of course, she would put her energy into the insider-trading case, and if she was lucky, it would go to trial, she would win, and, in some cases, she would then take a job with a large law firm. And in the process, the financial fraud case would get lost in the shuffle."
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/01/09/financial-crisis-why-no-executive-prosecutions/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3534736&forum_id=2#32689732) |
|
|