:D's MFE strategy turns out to be optimal
| Sticky school cafeteria twinkling uncleanness | 03/21/17 | | autistic marketing idea friendly grandma | 03/21/17 | | Sticky school cafeteria twinkling uncleanness | 03/21/17 | | violet bull headed property | 03/21/17 | | Puce alcoholic senate | 03/21/17 | | Elite office famous landscape painting | 03/21/17 | | Sticky school cafeteria twinkling uncleanness | 03/21/17 | | Sticky school cafeteria twinkling uncleanness | 07/10/18 | | Sticky school cafeteria twinkling uncleanness | 07/20/18 | | plum indian lodge | 07/20/18 | | multi-colored rusted gay wizard regret | 07/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2018 2:49 AM Author: plum indian lodge
Jenni Li 2 months ago
I would very much agree with this, and disagree with much that's in this article, which sounds chock-full of its own bias, albeit of a kind that won't get called out by anyone in PC-land. I've found it easier to work for and with most men than with women, who are cattier, more vicious, and unable to share or cooperate. The excuse I get from their enablers (and lesbians) is that they're women in a man's world and thus are "forced" to be the way they are. But for every self-centered, hard-headed or untrustworthy man named above, I can name plenty of women (Elizabeth Holmes, Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina, Sophia Amoruso, Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Ellen DeGeneres, Oprah Winfrey). The writer of this article might want to read this, https://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/549818/women-prefer-male-bosses/.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3560337&forum_id=2#36463957) |
|
|