The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is computer-generated evidence hearsay? Like timestamps of ID card usage
| Exciting theatre newt | 03/24/17 |
| Mint Sweet Tailpipe | 03/24/17 |
| opaque brunch wagecucks | 03/24/17 |
| Exciting theatre newt | 03/24/17 |
| opaque brunch wagecucks | 03/24/17 |
| bistre soul-stirring stage ratface | 03/24/17 |
| spectacular indigo useless brakes | 03/24/17 |
| Exciting theatre newt | 03/24/17 |
| azure 180 ticket booth tank | 03/24/17 |
| Slimy Racy Point Codepig | 03/24/17 |
| Onyx self-absorbed yarmulke skinny woman | 03/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:14 PM Author: Exciting theatre newt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906833) |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: Mint Sweet Tailpipe Most likely comes in under business record under the federal rules. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906869) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:18 PM Author: opaque brunch wagecucks Probably but biz record exception. You'd more or less defeat the objection same time as u authenticate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906877) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:23 PM Author: Exciting theatre newt ty for responses -- part of me thinks they might not even be hearsay in the first place because they are not out of court statement by a human being (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906932) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:28 PM Author: opaque brunch wagecucks Neither is a bank statement or a cell phone bill but those are admitted as biz records. Either way u should be fine if this is for an irl issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906964) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:26 PM Author: bistre soul-stirring stage ratface There's a split of authority on this. There's an eleventh circuit case that says it is nonhearsay because there's no human to make a "statement." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906950) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:27 PM Author: spectacular indigo useless brakes remember when this was a law bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906955) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Exciting theatre newt Law mastermen, consider this:
employees sign in and write down the time they sign in when they come to work. one of those employees sues employer for firing him. employer seeks to admit the sign in sheet to show that employee was tardy and regularly signed-in late. is the record of that employee's sign-in times nonhearsay because it's an admission by party opponent (the employee's signing-in is his own statement of time of arrival)? |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:31 PM Author: azure 180 ticket booth tank Of course it is. yw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907002) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Slimy Racy Point Codepig let me pull out my Barbri materials (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906989) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: Onyx self-absorbed yarmulke skinny woman would've researched this in the past week but the case settled so i didn't have to (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907023) |