SIXTH CIRCUIT FUCKS OVER POLICE SHOOTING VICTIM; FUCKED UP CASE
| saffron halford regret | 07/19/17 | | saffron halford regret | 07/19/17 | | Charismatic Telephone | 07/19/17 | | lascivious mauve foreskin | 07/19/17 | | saffron halford regret | 07/19/17 | | lascivious mauve foreskin | 07/19/17 | | saffron halford regret | 07/19/17 | | Sienna temple famous landscape painting | 07/19/17 | | arousing carnelian goyim | 07/19/17 | | saffron halford regret | 07/19/17 | | vigorous seedy parlor newt | 07/19/17 | | saffron halford regret | 07/19/17 | | hairraiser spruce set marketing idea | 07/19/17 | | lake laughsome stag film stain | 07/19/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: July 19th, 2017 5:11 PM Author: vigorous seedy parlor newt
The dissent was unhinged. After a high speed chase in the rain with speeds exceeding 100 mph, which concluded in the middle of nowhere, this occurred:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-aTO6JImA0
The suspect had demonstrated he was determined to avoid apprehension, and he was moving towards the officer to beat his ass.
As a matter of departmental policy, it would be perfectly reasonable to implement a policy where the police disengage in such situations instead of using lethal force. However, just because one reasonable approach to this situation does not entail the use of lethal force does not preclude the reasonableness of using lethal force from a constitutional perspective. It was perfectly reasonable for the officer to fear for his life in this situation, meaning it was a good shot.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3679324&forum_id=2#33811008) |
|
|