ball. How much does the ball cost?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33850905)

Ball $.05

Duh

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33850920)

size. If it takes 48 days for the patch to cover the entire lake, how long

would it take for the patch to cover half of the lake?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33850931)

shows. If the ball costs ten cents and the bat costs one dollar more, the bat

must cost $1.10. Adding those two figures together, the total cost of the bat

and ball would be $1.20, not $1.10. Therefore, the correct answer is five

cents—the ball costs five cents, the bat costs $1.05, and together they cost

$1.10

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33850930)

Ball is X

Bat is (X + 1.00)

X + (X + 1.00) = 1.10

2x + 1.00 = 1.10

2X =. 10

X =. 05

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33850990)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33850964)

K A 8 5

Here is a rule: If a card has a vowel on its letter side, it has an even number on its number side. Which card(s) must be turned over to find out if the rule is true or false?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33851041)

One night, the plumber entered the homeowner’s house without permission to retrieve his drill. The plumber found a drill, but quickly realized that it was not his. The plumber then left without taking anything, locking the door behind him.

Is the plumber guilty of burglary?

(A) No, because the plumber did not take anything.

(B) No, because the plumber made a reasonable mistake of fact.

(C) Yes, because larceny is a felony.

(D) Yes, because he entered the dwelling of another without permission.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33851118)

(A) No, due to the resident’s lack of personal knowledge regarding the incident in question.

(B) No, because habit evidence is limited to the conduct of persons, not businesses.

(C) Yes, as evidence of a routine practice.

(D) Yes, as a summary of her present sense impressions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33851184)

(A) No, because the woman would have still been primarily liable for payment, but the bank had released her from personal liability.

(B) No, because the bank’s release of the woman from per-sonal liability also released the man.

(C) Yes, because the bank’s release of the woman consti-tuted a clogging of the equity of redemption.

(D) Yes, because the man’s personal liability on the note was not affected by the bank’s release of the woman.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33851249)

http://magazine.utoronto.ca/summer-2009/rationality-quiz/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33851013)

http://www.ebay.com/itm/EASTON-POWER-BOLT-YOUTH-BASEBALL-BAT-30-IN-22-OZ-8-Mdl-LPB6/322602007164

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684406&forum_id=2#33851367)