Choosing Biglaw SA
| Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | iridescent yarmulke background story | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | iridescent yarmulke background story | 08/17/17 | | Slate Tantric Multi-billionaire Stead | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | iridescent yarmulke background story | 08/17/17 | | Slate Tantric Multi-billionaire Stead | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | Ivory Black Woman Incel | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | Ivory Black Woman Incel | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | Ivory Black Woman Incel | 08/17/17 | | Slate Tantric Multi-billionaire Stead | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | Slate Tantric Multi-billionaire Stead | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | puce hell | 08/17/17 | | Big church | 08/17/17 | | Drunken odious hissy fit | 08/17/17 | | Big church | 08/17/17 | | Ivory Black Woman Incel | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | Multi-colored field | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | Multi-colored field | 08/17/17 | | embarrassed to the bone sneaky criminal | 08/17/17 | | costumed resort | 08/17/17 | | coral soul-stirring party of the first part partner | 08/17/17 | | talking white preventive strike | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | coral soul-stirring party of the first part partner | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | coral soul-stirring party of the first part partner | 08/17/17 | | cerise cerebral reading party range | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | Big church | 08/17/17 | | Curious Violet Fanboi | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/17/17 | | puce hell | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed submissive space | 08/19/17 | | sienna mewling roommate | 08/17/17 | | wonderful rehab cuckold | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | amethyst gas station | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | amethyst gas station | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | amethyst gas station | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser bull headed location | 08/17/17 | | rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser bull headed location | 08/17/17 | | sienna mewling roommate | 08/17/17 | | wonderful rehab cuckold | 08/17/17 | | amethyst gas station | 08/17/17 | | wonderful rehab cuckold | 08/17/17 | | amethyst gas station | 08/17/17 | | wonderful rehab cuckold | 08/17/17 | | amethyst gas station | 08/17/17 | | wonderful rehab cuckold | 08/17/17 | | floppy national people who are hurt | 08/17/17 | | sienna mewling roommate | 08/17/17 | | wonderful rehab cuckold | 08/17/17 | | sienna mewling roommate | 08/17/17 | | floppy national people who are hurt | 08/17/17 | | puce hell | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Ivory Black Woman Incel
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Ivory Black Woman Incel
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: rebellious school cafeteria dingle berry
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: floppy national people who are hurt
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|