Choosing Biglaw SA
| peach office | 08/17/17 | | laughsome hall queen of the night | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/17/17 | | laughsome hall queen of the night | 08/17/17 | | chrome dashing legend party of the first part | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | laughsome hall queen of the night | 08/17/17 | | chrome dashing legend party of the first part | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Chestnut boyish locus trust fund | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Chestnut boyish locus trust fund | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Chestnut boyish locus trust fund | 08/17/17 | | chrome dashing legend party of the first part | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | chrome dashing legend party of the first part | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Thriller twisted quadroon locale | 08/17/17 | | topaz puppy | 08/17/17 | | ultramarine doctorate hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | topaz puppy | 08/17/17 | | Chestnut boyish locus trust fund | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Charismatic Faggotry | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/17/17 | | Charismatic Faggotry | 08/17/17 | | Adulterous grizzly rigor | 08/17/17 | | Insecure mustard toaster azn | 08/17/17 | | Emerald Stirring Stage Dingle Berry | 08/17/17 | | orange alpha windowlicker | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/17/17 | | Emerald Stirring Stage Dingle Berry | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/17/17 | | Emerald Stirring Stage Dingle Berry | 08/17/17 | | underhanded pocket flask | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/17/17 | | topaz puppy | 08/17/17 | | khaki aphrodisiac gaping potus | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/17/17 | | Thriller twisted quadroon locale | 08/17/17 | | peach office | 08/19/17 | | Brindle Razzle Institution Toilet Seat | 08/17/17 | | adventurous fantasy-prone property haunted graveyard | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Aromatic antidepressant drug roast beef | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Aromatic antidepressant drug roast beef | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | Aromatic antidepressant drug roast beef | 08/17/17 | | disturbing location internal respiration | 08/17/17 | | Cracking set foreskin | 08/17/17 | | disturbing location internal respiration | 08/17/17 | | Brindle Razzle Institution Toilet Seat | 08/17/17 | | adventurous fantasy-prone property haunted graveyard | 08/17/17 | | Aromatic antidepressant drug roast beef | 08/17/17 | | adventurous fantasy-prone property haunted graveyard | 08/17/17 | | Aromatic antidepressant drug roast beef | 08/17/17 | | adventurous fantasy-prone property haunted graveyard | 08/17/17 | | Aromatic antidepressant drug roast beef | 08/17/17 | | adventurous fantasy-prone property haunted graveyard | 08/17/17 | | Haunting offensive feces | 08/17/17 | | Brindle Razzle Institution Toilet Seat | 08/17/17 | | adventurous fantasy-prone property haunted graveyard | 08/17/17 | | Brindle Razzle Institution Toilet Seat | 08/17/17 | | Haunting offensive feces | 08/17/17 | | Thriller twisted quadroon locale | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Chestnut boyish locus trust fund
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Chestnut boyish locus trust fund
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: Cracking set foreskin
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: Haunting offensive feces
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|