Date: October 1st, 2017 11:11 PM
Author: vivacious address roast beef
Sounds pretty legit to me.
https://lookism.net/Thread-Theory-What-PSL-ratings-means-in-real-life-Connection-to-percentiles
[Theory] What PSL ratings means in real life. Connection to percentiles.
Retro_face_retro_life
Member
Posts: 157
Threads: 19
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 100
#1
4 hours ago (This post was last modified: 4 hours ago by Retro_face_retro_life.)
PSL rating is a objective rating scale, that rates individual features, harmony and healthy appearance. No subjective rating is allowed, if you have personal preference for NW2 hairline it doesn't matter on PSL. A person's number is standard and universal across all PSL raters with a +-0.5 deviation at the most (the rest are inaccuracies).
But what does that mean? By putting every person on earth on an objective scale you get an normal distribution of looks, since looks are so random and we are 7 billion.
Let's just assume for a second that there are no unattractive races and no unattractive features on each race. Everyone can be born attractive. (just an assumption, obviously not real). According to statistics the population's attractiveness should follow the standard deviation, which is below (Skip if you don't like math, but they are simple if you follow me):
Where ì is the average, in our case the classic 5, and ó is 1, every point of attractiveness away from average. (10s don't exist according to PSL). So imagine the area under the graph like this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Now, lets analyze what this all means:
68% of people are average (4-6)
13.5% of people are semi-Chads (6-7)
2.35% of people are Chads (7-8)
0.15% of people are Godly Male model Slayers (8-9). (could be even smaller)
The rest 16% are ugly, deformed, genetic failures (Down syndrome etc)
I was inspired by a recent post, "The life of the 6/10 male" for this. Let's see some interesting facts from this scale:
Chads are actually incredibly rare. Top 2.5% of young males or 5 males out of 200.
Being a 5 makes you top 50%. Looksmaxing from a 5 to a 6 makes you top 16% (!!!). This is why "normies" give the same advice to incels, they worked wonders for them since they were average. That's why gymcelling etc is legit for every average guy. Ugly guys, not so much... you will still be bottom % or average.
Being a 6 makes you top 16%. Looksmaxing from a 6 to a 7 makes you top 2.5% (!!!). From fucking average women, to having a chance with stacies.
If you are legit 6 and over there is no reason not to get laid, it's all in your mind. You are top percentage of men. You might not slay every girl you meet, but your chances are high as fuck
I am assuming the PSL ratings are accurate, since some of your ratings on some guys here are very questionable... PSL 6 is a compliment. PSL 7 and you wouldn't be able to be here, let's all be honest.
And we assumed that there are not unattractive races. In reality, the biggest percentage of people are ethnic and non-white, which means being white already puts you in an advantage.
Why do normies sugarcoat with high ratings?
The reason normies have such a wrong conception of ratings is because they imagine the above graph as a straight line.
This means in their mind a 7/10 is top 30% of men and a 9/10 is a top 10% of men. So the original suggestion that IRL=PSLx1.5 is close but inaccurate, they are completely different scales.
Be careful of your rating and focus on looksmaxxing boys.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#34343192)