\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Rate this poast on Lookism on attractiveness rankings

Sounds pretty legit to me. https://lookism.net/Thread-The...
French shivering pit death wish
  10/01/17
Lookism is the site that Eliot Rodgers used a lot. Supposed...
Chest-beating codepig
  10/01/17
Lots of great information on there. Detailed discussions of...
French shivering pit death wish
  10/01/17
ljl
pearl concupiscible deer antler
  10/02/17
...
Self-centered violet son of senegal
  10/01/17
lmao fuck im dying
Hot thriller university
  01/16/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: October 1st, 2017 11:11 PM
Author: French shivering pit death wish

Sounds pretty legit to me.

https://lookism.net/Thread-Theory-What-PSL-ratings-means-in-real-life-Connection-to-percentiles

[Theory] What PSL ratings means in real life. Connection to percentiles.

Retro_face_retro_life

Member

Posts: 157

Threads: 19

Joined: Sep 2017

Reputation: 100

#1

4 hours ago (This post was last modified: 4 hours ago by Retro_face_retro_life.)

PSL rating is a objective rating scale, that rates individual features, harmony and healthy appearance. No subjective rating is allowed, if you have personal preference for NW2 hairline it doesn't matter on PSL. A person's number is standard and universal across all PSL raters with a +-0.5 deviation at the most (the rest are inaccuracies). 

But what does that mean? By putting every person on earth on an objective scale you get an normal distribution of looks, since looks are so random and we are 7 billion. 

Let's just assume for a second that there are no unattractive races and no unattractive features on each race. Everyone can be born attractive. (just an assumption, obviously not real). According to statistics the population's attractiveness should follow the standard deviation, which is below (Skip if you don't like math, but they are simple if you follow me):

Where ì is the average, in our case the classic 5, and ó is 1, every point of attractiveness away from average. (10s don't exist according to PSL). So imagine the area under the graph like this:

       

 1          2             3            4            5             6            7             8           9       

Now, lets analyze what this all means:

68% of people are average (4-6)

13.5% of people are semi-Chads (6-7)

2.35% of people are Chads (7-8)

0.15% of people are Godly Male model Slayers (8-9). (could be even smaller)

The rest 16% are ugly, deformed, genetic failures (Down syndrome etc)

I was inspired by a recent post, "The life of the 6/10 male" for this. Let's see some interesting facts from this scale:

Chads are actually incredibly rare. Top 2.5% of young males or 5 males out of 200. 

Being a 5 makes you top 50%. Looksmaxing from a 5 to a 6 makes you top 16% (!!!). This is why "normies" give the same advice to incels, they worked wonders for them since they were average. That's why gymcelling etc is legit for every average guy. Ugly guys, not so much... you will still be bottom % or average.

Being a 6 makes you top 16%. Looksmaxing from a 6 to a 7 makes you top 2.5% (!!!). From fucking average women, to having a chance with stacies.

If you are legit 6 and over there is no reason not to get laid, it's all in your mind. You are top percentage of men. You might not slay every girl you meet, but your chances are high as fuck

I am assuming the PSL ratings are accurate, since some of your ratings on some guys here are very questionable... PSL 6 is a compliment. PSL 7 and you wouldn't be able to be here, let's all be honest.

And we assumed that there are not unattractive races. In reality, the biggest percentage of people are ethnic and non-white, which means being white already puts you in an advantage.

Why do normies sugarcoat with high ratings?

The reason normies have such a wrong conception of ratings is because they imagine the above graph as a straight line.

This means in their mind a 7/10 is top 30% of men and a 9/10 is a top 10% of men. So the original suggestion that IRL=PSLx1.5 is close but inaccurate, they are completely different scales.  

Be careful of your rating and focus on looksmaxxing boys.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#34343192)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 1st, 2017 11:13 PM
Author: Chest-beating codepig

Lookism is the site that Eliot Rodgers used a lot. Supposed to tell young men about women and how to attain and stuff.

Once went to the Lookism tinychat and the owner (of the tinychat room) was a gay jew, no joke.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#34343204)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 1st, 2017 11:21 PM
Author: French shivering pit death wish

Lots of great information on there. Detailed discussions of the latest medical studies on attractiveness. It's really pretty impressive.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#34343260)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 2nd, 2017 3:40 AM
Author: pearl concupiscible deer antler

ljl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#34344334)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 1st, 2017 11:13 PM
Author: Self-centered violet son of senegal



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#34343205)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 16th, 2018 3:10 AM
Author: Hot thriller university

lmao fuck im dying

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3749955&forum_id=2#35166102)