The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The left's groups are all geared toward destroying organizations.
| dull thirsty public bath place of business | 10/21/17 |
| Internet-worthy fear-inspiring pocket flask | 10/21/17 |
| Comical claret prole stag film | 10/21/17 |
| dull thirsty public bath place of business | 10/21/17 |
| Internet-worthy fear-inspiring pocket flask | 10/21/17 |
| dull thirsty public bath place of business | 10/21/17 |
| Internet-worthy fear-inspiring pocket flask | 10/21/17 |
| Spruce locus pisswyrm | 10/21/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:33 AM Author: dull thirsty public bath place of business The left can't build a lasting organization for shit. If it could, it'd be the right.
That's why, with no conservative institutions left to destroy, the left will eat itself. |
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:41 AM Author: Internet-worthy fear-inspiring pocket flask This is also intentional - a small motivated group of men can do basically anything. Hence the eradication of everything from men's-only country clubs to motorcycle clubs to unisex sports (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493338) |
 |
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:42 AM Author: Comical claret prole stag film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493343) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:45 AM Author: dull thirsty public bath place of business Strongly agree re: small motivated groups of men. History rests on their backs.
I wonder if it's willing destruction. Yes, in many cases - but the natural tendency of women is to want to join any group that is successful and hangs a "men only" sign. It's just the drive to CRASH THE BOY'S CLUB. Hence all boys' clubs will be crashed over time unless there's a legal or social norm maintaining them.
Personally I believe in voluntary association - no animus to the very rare woman who can maek it under objective standards. But of course we've reduced standards such that, e.g., you can graduate VMI w/o being able to do a single chin-up. |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:47 AM Author: Internet-worthy fear-inspiring pocket flask Well, if it isn't the cake for libs it has to be the icing. Can't help but wonder if women's enfranchisement etc was designed (which it had to be, it's too patently absurd to arise naturally) to pre-emptively thwart any threats to whatever social order currently stands (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493358) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:51 AM Author: dull thirsty public bath place of business Re: design, your supposition is correct. Anti-suffragist writings are fun reading; I could find the pull-quote I was looking for re motives but here's Mills getting GAPED:
Exactly the same plan was followed by Mill in handling the question of woman's suffrage. Instead of dealing with woman as she is, and with woman placed in a setting of actually sub- sisting conditions, Mill takes as his theme a woman who is a creature of his imagination. This woman is, by assumption, in mental en- dowments a replica of man. She lives in a world which is, by tacit assumption, free from complications of sex. And, if practical con- siderations had ever come into the purview of Mill's mind, she would, by tacit assumption, be paying her own way, and be making full per- sonal and financial contributions to the State. It is in connexion with this fictitious woman that Mill sets himself to work out the benefits 28 which women would derive from co-partner- ship with men in the government of the State, and those which such co-partnership would confer on the community. Finally, practis- ing again upon himself the same imposition as in his Political Economy, this unpractical trafficker in abstractions sets out to persuade his reader that he has, by dealing with fictions of the mind, effectively grappled with the concrete problem of woman's suffrage. This, then, is the philosopher who gives in- tellectual prestige to the Woman's Suffrage cause.
***
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5183/5183-h/5183-h.htm |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:53 AM Author: Internet-worthy fear-inspiring pocket flask Lol, devastatingly absolute. Wonder why a strong black woman wasn't the brains behind suffragism - Hollywood needs to get to work convincing everyone it was (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493371) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2017 8:53 AM Author: Spruce locus pisswyrm Even if women can make it on boys standards, inevitably 2-3 guys in the group will want to fuck her and she’ll fuck up the group dynamic and distract from the mission. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493370) |