That's just a fact you can't handwave away with the "racism" card.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#34502564)

You're saying the equivalent of: "Tell me what two plus two equals, without using the racist concept of four."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#34502601)

socialism only works in closed systems. even then you need a high degree of homogeneity or failing that a very strong sense of nationalism, neither of which we have here, to sell the high taxation needed as a cost of supporting your deadbeats while you selflessly slave away.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#34502747)

Socialist countries filled with low IQ minorities also had PLENTY of oil wealth (Venezuela comes to mind). Yet they are complete shitholes.

Hmmm...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#34535392)

NOTE -- that is NOT racist. Islam is a RELIGION, not a RACE. Ignorant shitlibs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#34503229)

I don't think I've ever seen you make a post that isn't denigrating some minority group.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37980122)

"Black women are not less attractive on average, and your repeated assertions thereof are why I call you racist."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4214639&forum_id=2#37891138)

"black men are the most attractive anyway"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4225065&forum_id=2#37965599)

You've tried endlessly to argue that my racial preferences are wrong and bad and RACIST, and yours aren't, by claiming that I meant my preferences are objectively correct, while yours are just aesthetic preference for black men's appearance or something, which is absurd for several reasons:

(1) we're talking about attraction, which is obviously subjective, and I never said anything to indicate that I think my opinions on the topic are objective facts (other than my scoffing "no way" to a contrary opinion, which you autistically misunderstood as an assertion that that contrary opinion was physically impossible or something

(2) when you said black men are more attractive, you expounded on this totally-subjective-and-not-racist opinion by listing a bunch of objective claims about what black men and white men tend to be like:

"black men are the most attractive anyway (dark skin is most attractive in men, they have masculine faces and strong jaw lines, it's scientifically proven that they have more testosterone than white men, they're more muscular, they're stronger, they're more athletic, they're better at sports,, they have more dominant/aggressive personalities, they're just moremasculine in general, they're more outgoing and sociable, éthey're better dancers, they have bigger dicks, they're better lovers."

SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN!

"white men have always been fucking terrified about the idea of black men having sex with white women"

"there are white cucks who are obsessed with and turned on by the idea of strong big dicked black men ducking their women"

"White guys are so insecure"

Yeah, totally subjective racial opinions here.

I'm sure you would have no problem whatsoever with a subjective defense of one's subjective opinion that black women are less attractive, that consists of a deranged screed about how black women tend to be loud, angry, fat, dumb, hideous welfare queens who are always chomping down on fried chicken and chimping out about how DAT TOO MANY LETTUCE. Because that would be the race-reversed equivalent of your horseshit.

And that's not even getting into your posts about how Indian men are "asexual," which is straight-up dehumanizing, or this little gem:

"fucking white people

white people have to go around the world making life miserable for all humans they have ever encountered

white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4214966&forum_id=2#37897288)

You are far and away the most racist person on this board, and it isn't close. As for your accusations of me being racist:

(1) My "racist" posts are assertions of differences in the racial averages of traits like IQ, which have to do with how we interpret racial differences between groups; I have never suggested any individual should be treated differently based on their race, as I think every individual should be treated equally. I tend to make these posts in joking form saying shit like "perpetual-motion machines" but that doesn't make them more racist. Tons of people privately believe these things and are still normal people living normal lives, being friends with and dating minorities etc (just look at white libs wanting to live in "good neighborhoods" and send their kids to "good schools," i.e. avoid blacks and Hispanics out of pure self-interest). Lol at you thinking I'm some Klansman because of these opinions.

(2) My "racist" posts are right in the middle of the mainstream racial views of this board, no different from what other people on here post all the time, so your "most racist poster on the board" comment is entirely unjustified. You're just singling me out and attacking me here because I've gaped so many of your posts. But yeah, keep being MAF every time I clown on you.

XOXO HTFH

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981197)

I call you a racist not because of your personal sexual views but because you're always talking shit about minorities. Even when it comes out of nowhere. Like someone asked for examples of things proles say and you mentioned black people requesting hand-outs. You claim that black people didn't help build the country. You are always bringing up AA whenever a successful black person was mentioned. You did it to AOC and you did it to me. Your dumb ass even suggested that I got into Stuy because of AA, being too stupid to realize there IS no AA for NYC's Specialized Science High Schools. Even though you'd never seen the girl in question and multiple people said otherwise you said it was impossible for whatyoudreamof to be the hottest poster because she's black. You said similar things to me, saying in my "Guess my race" thread that guys saying I looked black means I look ugly. If there's q conflict between a black person and a white person you side with the white person, as in the case of the 16 year old sex shave who killed her John.

This is a board on which people cheered on a guy for shooting thirty innocent Muslim people. People are constantly called nigger and kike and "jokes" are made about gassing various groups of people. There is no colorable argument to be made for me being the most racist poster on the board. I'm friends with lots of whites in here, I have never suggested whites are inferior to blacks (you imply that blacks are inferior all the time) and I have never advocated for violence against any group of people. If you honestly think I'm the most racist poster on the board, you're even stupider than I thought you were, which is about 2 standard deviations lower than me in terms of IQ.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981589)

I didn't say "handouts," I was talking about reparations, and was specifically referring to you and your idiotic arguments for reparations, even though I didn't mention you by name.

"You claim that black people didn't help build the country."

I never said they didn't help, I said that whites built it in the intellectual sense, specifically in response to your claim that blacks are more American than many white groups due to having been here longest.

"You are always bringing up AA whenever a successful black person was mentioned. You did it to AOC and you did it to me."

No I don't bring it up whenever a successful black person is mentioned, I bring it up whenever a dumb person of any AA group is mentioned, such as you (because you post dumb shit on here all the time) and AOC (who isn't black, and who despite affirmative action had the career path of BU --> bartender).

"Your dumb ass even suggested that I got into Stuy because of AA, being too stupid to realize there IS no AA for NYC's Specialized Science High Schools."

Oh EXCUSE ME for having been unaware that despite AA being widely practiced across every university, megacorp, and government agency in the country, the one exception to AA is elite high schools in one city. Yes, clearly I should have known about this one particular area in which meritocracy has prevailed over black privilege.

"You said similar things to me, saying in my "Guess my race" thread that guys saying I looked black means I look ugly."

No, I said that data shows that men on average tend to find black women less attractive, so people just saying "you look black" and nothing else doesn't support your false claim in that thread that "Every man ITT who has commented on my looks said I was attractive."

"you said it was impossible for whatyoudreamof to be the hottest poster because she's black."

Holy fuck, are you on crack right at this minute? I specifically addressed and refuted this horseshit (yet again) in the post you're replying to. Since you seemed to have missed it:

---I never said anything to indicate that I think my opinions on the topic are objective facts (other than my scoffing "no way" to a contrary opinion, which you autistically misunderstood as an assertion that that contrary opinion was physically impossible or something---

"If there's q conflict between a black person and a white person you side with the white person, as in the case of the 16 year old sex shave who killed her John."

Lmao, do you have any other examples of me always siding with the white person, other than this one case where I sided with the fucking murder victim over the murderer?

"People are constantly called nigger and kike and "jokes" are made about gassing various groups of people. There is no colorable argument to be made for me being the most racist poster on the board."

Good lord you're stupid, fucking DBG (whose whole shtick is "look at how Jewish I am") says kike all the time. No one is serious about "gassing" anyone. Saying racial slurs for fun and making jokes like that is a hell of a lot less serious than your rants about all the many specific ways in which you think black men are objectively superior.

"There is no colorable argument to be made for me being the most racist poster on the board... I have never suggested whites are inferior to blacks"

LMAO

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

Gas yourself, you retarded crack-addict pig

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981726)

My point, obviously, you gigantic retard, was just that you are very racist. I guess AA legacies don't need to know what "hyperbole" is to get into Yale.

Now, speaking of "skipping over" arguments, why don't you go back and address the whole rest of my post, which you skipped? Particularly the part where (since we're having an argument in which you say that I'm racist and you aren't) you stated that "white people are the fucking scourge of humanity."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981879)

Legacy? I'm not a legacy you buffoon. And why are you constantly bringing up my Yale admission out of the blue? You're so fucking jealous that I got in and you didn't .

Oh and "scourge of humanity" was obviously a HYPERBOLE as well, moron. I have lots of white friends both here and IRL and they'll all tell you I'm not at local racist.

All of your arguments are just so fucking dumb.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981998)

How can you possibly be missing the point this badly? You repeatedly called me "racist" for finding black women less attractive, then went on and on about how much more attractive black men are, in a way that was far more "racist" than anything I said (assuming that assertions about a race's attractiveness can sometimes be racist to some extent). The point of that was that you're a hypocritical idiot.

The reason you're "very racist" is that you say dehumanizing things about Indian men and constantly attack white people:

-"white men have always been fucking terrified about the idea of black men having sex with white women"

-"there are white cucks who are obsessed with and turned on by the idea of strong big dicked black men ducking their women"

-"White guys are so insecure"

-"whites are racist against non-whites"

-"white people have to go around the world making life miserable for all humans they have ever encountered"

-"white people are the fucking scourge of humanity"

Were those all HYPERBOLE? What would be the non-hyperbolic version of "scourge of humanity"? Maybe that whites are just kinda evil? Why don't you just assume that anything "racist" that I've ever said was "hyperbole" also, then? There goes your whole argument for me being extremely racist.

"I have lots of white friends"

Jesus Christ, don't black people IRL and in the media etc love to mock this argument? "I'm not racist, I have black friends!" Good grief lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37982156)

Read my response now thiugh

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37985720)

I'll humor you though: what in particular was I wrong about? 😊

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37986166)

As for my racist, everything I say is either opinion (I'm not attracted to Indian men - and again you skipped over the part where I pointed out that many people (.including yourself) say they're not attracted to black women and Asian men all the time and you never say anything about these people (you gloss over points you can't answer a lot). They even go farther than I am, using racial slurs and calling people ugly and shut. I haveNEVER. Called Indian men ugly, I have just said they're not for me, and that was in response to that idiot jag saying he didn't want to fuck me. I politely informed him that that was a dilemma he'd never find himself in because I 'm not attracted to Indian men. Me proceeded to call me a nigger and she-boon and shit. You also didn't even bother to contest my point that you wouldn't be angry/call me racist if I said white men were most attractive. XO posters argue that whites of both sexes are the most people on earth all the time and I NEVER see you chiding them about that... Hm I have NO IDEA why that would be. 😇

The other things I say are fact. White men historically HAVE been obsessed with preventing black men from fucking white women. In the south it was illegal until the civil rights movement and many black men were arrested, castrated and even lynched solely on the suspicion of having "relations" with white women. Am I wrong? We have all read To Kill A Mockingbird lol. ( Before your aspie ass spazzes out in me, I'm not actually using To Kill A Mockingbird as evidence, I'm just joking around). To this day the idea still obsessed white men. Why do you think interracial is one of the most popular varieties of porn?and as I said, *i* have been asked by more than one white man whether it's actually true that black men have bigger dicks. Was it wrong of me to mention it? Is that what makes me racist? Or would you not characterize that question as "insecure?"

When I said whites have made life miserable for people all over the world - have whites NOT colonized the entire world? Do you think is was a pleasant experience for the native peoples involved? Are you aware of the history of the Belgian Congo? The extermination of the Native American Indians? The overthrow of the democratically elected president of Guatemala who was engaging in land reform (given land "owned" by rich landowners to the largely poor population) and engaging in other revolutionary programs ) by the CIA who installed a puppet dictator? Apartheid in South Africa? Has there been one corner of earth that hasn't been visited by Europeans and exploited? If I am wrong please let me know, I am always in the mood for a history lesson.

Finally, I told you about the study which showed that whites do not like supporting programs that benefit non-whites (even if they benefit whites as well). Is this not racist as well?

You are basically calling me racist because I say a lot of (entirely truthful and supported things that happen to support your feelings.) while ignoring white posters who constantly say even worse things about non-.whites. So it is YOU who are the hypocrite, my friend. And this is not my problem.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37985717)

“Look, you clearly don't like blacks much.”

False. I have no problem with black people, I just dislike dumb shitlibs who blame everything on white racism, say nasty things about white people, say that they deserve “reparations,” etc. Obviously, those people are primarily minorities. It’s not like there are whites demanding reparations whom I could be criticizing instead.

“Whenever anyone mentions black success, you are always trying to chalk it up to AA (you o this to me a lot, even for .stuyvesant which doesn't fucking have AA lol).”

The sole examples you’ve provided of this are yourself and AOC, both of whom I bring up AA about because I think you’re both dumb, based on the things you and she say (and based on her career path). I mentioned AA in response to Stuyvesant ONCE, because, like I said, I was unaware that AA is not in effect for this one particular thing, specialized NYC high-school admission, unlike everywhere fucking else. Why the hell should I have known that?

“You refuse to believe that K received a 173 because I'm black.”

No, again, I’m skeptical of it because you seem dumb.

“You are constantly saying that you don't find black women attractive and think it's impossible that a black woman could be the hottest xo poster.”

Good lord, you are like those shitlib journalists who mindlessly repeat “Trump bragged about committing sexual assault” no matter how many times it’s patiently explained to them that the words “they let you do it” specifically imply consent. As I have repeatedly tried to get through your thick skull: I did not say “impossible,” and the only basis you have for this nonsense is that I said “no way,” which any non-autist can recognize as hyperbole implying skepticism.

And as I’ve repeatedly told you, this was my opinion, and is no different from your own race-based attraction. You insist that it’s somehow different because I explicitly disagreed with others’ opinions instead of just asserting my own opinion like you do, but there is no reason why doing so should be considered more “racist” or considered a claim of objective fact. The only difference was that you phrased your opinion as “I feel this way” versus me responding to your opinion as “I don’t feel that way.” This is an irrelevant difference and it’s bizarre that you’re so fixated on this point.

“You think blacks are the reason the US can't have socialism.”

You’re inferring this solely on the basis of me making a joke about perpetual-motion machines. I said that because I thought it was funny, not because it reflects some strongly held racist view about blacks and socialism. I don’t know the extent to which the URM underclass inhibits socialism and I don’t give a shit.

“You get angry whenever black accomplishments are brought up and always try to diminish them (for instance, claiming blacks didn't build the US or create American music).”

It’s true that blacks didn’t build the US in the intellectual (i.e. most important) sense: democracy, science, technology, medicine, and everything else that makes the US a leading country were almost entirely due to non-blacks. And no, they didn’t fucking “create American music” either; that nonsense has been refuted by this post to which you’ve yet to respond: http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4216121&forum_id=2#37899089

“Out of the blue, when asked for a prole statement you decided to start talking about blacks and reparations.”

So? Reparations is nonsense and based on prole logic. Blacks are the only race asking for reparations.

“You always side with whites against blacks.”

Again with this stupid crap that I’ve responded to. Why don’t you respond to my response instead of repeating yourself? Like I said: do you have any other examples of me always siding with the white person, other than this one case where I sided with the fucking murder victim over the murderer?

“As a matter of fact, I believe that a large part of your hostility towards me is that I am a smart, successful black woman”

Yes, clearly you having a job as a social worker making 75k in a high-cost-of-living area in your mid-30s is an infuriating level of success.

“You are obsessed with the idea that minorities can only succeed via AA”

Good grief, now you’re repeating yourself in the SAME POST. Pretty sure this is the same point as “Whenever anyone mentions black success, you are always trying to chalk it up to AA” above.

“You're also jealous of me, which is why you always take such a bitter tone when talking to me and CONSTANTLY mention ?Yale and my LSAT score, usually in a nasty, sarcastic manner, even when I nor anyone else has mentioned them and they are entirely unrelated to the conversation at hand.”

I mention them because you post about them all the fucking time like we’re supposed to be so impressed, so it makes for a good insult toward you when you say stupid things despite supposedly being a smart Yale grad. Nasty and sarcastic doesn’t imply bitter; your “jealousy” bullshit is retarded speculation on your part. I’m not jealous of you.

Even this post is an example of you bragging pointlessly about your credentials. You could have stopped after “I am a smart, successful black woman” and yet you felt the need to give me your entire fucking resume, including the fact that you got a BOOKS AND LIVING STIPEND at a law school you didn’t even go to. I have never heard of your amazing stipend offer before, so I’m not sure why this would be part of my hostility toward you.

“you skipped over the part where I pointed out that many people (.including yourself) say they're not attracted to black women and Asian men all the time and you never say anything about these people”

I don’t say anything about those people because those people don’t then turn around and call other people racist for their race-based attraction. This is yet another point I’ve made before; I haven’t glossed over shit.

“I haveNEVER. Called Indian men ugly, I have just said they're not for me, and that was in response to that idiot jag saying he didn't want to fuck me. I politely informed him that that was a dilemma he'd never find himself in because I 'm not attracted to Indian men.”

No, you said that you consider Indian men asexual, you liar. This is extremely racist and dehumanizing. This is a hell of a lot further than even someone saying it’s impossible for a black woman to be the most attractive (which, again, I DID NOT say.)

“You also didn't even bother to contest my point that you wouldn't be angry/call me racist if I said white men were most attractive. XO posters argue that whites of both sexes are the most people on earth all the time and I NEVER see you chiding them about that... Hm I have NO IDEA why that would be.”

Uh, I contested it right here, you idiot:

---How can you possibly be missing the point this badly? You repeatedly called me "racist" for finding black women less attractive, then went on and on about how much more attractive black men are, in a way that was far more "racist" than anything I said (assuming that assertions about a race's attractiveness can sometimes be racist to some extent). The point of that was that you're a hypocritical idiot.---

The above was directly in response to your “if I had said white men were more attractive your dumb ass wouldn't have said anything.” How the fuck did you miss that? I don’t chide them because I don’t have a problem with that, nor do I have a problem with you finding black men more attractive. I have a problem with your bizarre double standard on whether this is racist. The exact same point could have been made if you had said white men are more attractive: either way, it’s you saying one race is more attractive and complaining when other people make similar assertions.

“The other things I say are fact. White men historically HAVE been obsessed...”

So what? How is this relevant to the present? Why don’t you ever shit on other races for things their ancestors did?

“To this day the idea still obsessed white men. Why do you think interracial is one of the most popular varieties of porn?”

What evidence do you have that it’s disproportionately white men who watch black male/white female interracial porn? How do you know it’s not being watched mainly by black men, or white women, or Asian men? Minorities are like 40% of the US now so you can’t assume that porn stats mainly reflect white men’s preferences.

“Was it wrong of me to mention it? Is that what makes me racist? Or would you not characterize that question as "insecure?”

No, it’s just the hypocrisy as stated above.

“When I said whites have made life miserable for people all over the world - have whites NOT colonized the entire world? ...”

Oh, so you were talking about shit that happened decades or centuries ago? You said “scourge of humanity” and “white people have to go around the world making life miserable” in the present tense. You even said “all other people are just now realizing that” to clarify that you meant NOW. Also, all that shit is no longer happening, but what is still happening is that non-whites all over the world are benefiting hugely from technology and medicine invented by whites.

In any case, every race genocided or invaded other ethnic groups' lands; you're just focusing on whites because they did so more recently and on a larger scale due to having better technology.

“Finally, I told you about the study which showed that whites do not like supporting programs that benefit non-whites (even if they benefit whites as well). Is this not racist as well?”

Perhaps, but other races are just as racist, so it doesn’t support your point that “whites are the scourge of humanity” or that they “try to make life miserable” for minorities any more than other races would if they were the majority in the US.

“You are basically calling me racist because I say a lot of (entirely truthful and supported things that happen to support your feelings.”

Oh, so “it’s not racist if it’s true”? Then all my comments and jokes about blacks getting AA and whatever else aren’t racist either, because THEY’RE TRUE.

“while ignoring white posters who constantly say even worse things about non-.whites.”

I ignore them because they don’t attack me or constantly display hypocrisy. I never said they weren’t racist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37991228)

When I was in UG we read a study that shows whites have less support for social programs the more they think blacks and Hispanics are going to benefit from them.

I mean, 95% of the country SHOULD be in favor of socialism. All but the very rich would benefit from free healthcare, generous unemployment benefits, aid to the needy, required parental leave, etc. but Republicans (who solely exist to further enrich the mega wealthy) have convinced poor and working class whites that blacks and Mexicans (rather than rich whites) are their enemy. When really poor blacks, whites and Hispanics should be getting together and uniting against rich whites.

So yeah this is why we can't have nice things in this country.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37980169)

Conservative policies would actually be better for poor urban blacks, because instead of keeping them dependent on handouts they would be required to better themselves/get their shit together.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37980521)

When I was in UG we read a study that shows whites have less support for social programs the more they think blacks and Hispanics are going to benefit from them."

This is because of simple in-group preference, you moron. It's the same tribalism that every race practices. Does your "study" show what happens to blacks/Asians/Hispanics' level of support for social programs when they think a different race is benefiting vs. their own race benefiting? Or does it just look at whites?

Also lol at your 110-IQ reddit argumentation of "I read this one study, therefore [vast, sweeping, nuance-free claim about white people].

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981236)

Who cares how these other groups behave?

Whites are the majority of the country, and thus the ones who get to decide whether we have socialism. The purpose of this post wasn't to attack whites but to explain why there is no socialism in the US. IF blacks were a minority of the US perhaps their tribalism would be relevant to this conversation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981641)

Are you low-IQ schtick these days? Whites barely have a majority. To put it in perspective, if every minority in the US showed up and voted for Clinton then she would be POTUS right now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37987203)

tyft. I needed a 70 IQ answer and here it is.

"When really poor blacks, whites and Hispanics should be getting together and uniting against rich whites."

I notice that you're saying everyone should be against rich whites but not rich blacks/hispanics/etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37987166)

1. Human beings are tribal by nature, and unfortunately, race is the primary tribal force. I cannot think of a single instance in human history when a racial or ethnic groups wanted other groups to do better than them. White Americans, blacks, latinos, Asians, are no different in this regard.

2. The Scandinavian countries actually moved away from the Socialist model in the 1980s when they were a fucking mess, and the voters elected center-right politicians. What they currently have is a capitalist economy with high taxes and regulations and a very generous safety net. But the safety net is reserved for citizens, and given how small those countries are, it is not comparable to the U.S. Great Britain before Thatcher was pretty close to socialism as the government controlled large swaths of the industries. It was a disaster.

3. Policies are ultimately about cost-benefit analysis and tradeoffs. There is no "perfect" policy that equally helps everyone. Sure, Scandinavian countries have free health care and free colleges. But their hospitals are mediocre compared to ours. Do they have hospitals on par with Johns Hopkins, Mass General, Mayo Clinic? Absolutely not. With single payer, providers will get paid significantly less, and this will dis-incentivize the best from entering the medical profession. With single payer, the demand will explode, as millions of people will start using doctors and ER services for even the most trivial reasons. After all, if it's free, why not use it? This will create an enormous strain on our health services system.

Next, let's look at universities. Do the Scandinavian countries have elite universities on par with ours? Nope. When they are funded solely by the government, they don't have the resources to hire the best professors, researchers, create cutting edge research labs, or lure the best and the brightest. Yes, they are free, but they suck.

The same with companies. Due to high taxes and regulations, there is virtually no innovation coming out of Scandinavia. Out of their 50 largest companies, only like 1 was founded after 1970. With a virtually non-existent VC and startup space, budding entrepreneurs are taking their talents elsewhere, as the cost of capital for creating a new business is prohibitively high, and the potential rewards are limited due to government policy.

4. Blue Smoke doesn't understand the American electorate. The reason why average Americans hate high taxes and regulations is not because they think they are going to be the next Bezos. Rather, they are deeply suspicious of government power and the government dictating who gets paid "too much" and setting tax rates purely for punitive reasons. They want a generous safety net for those who pay their taxes and play by the rules, but they still want a robust private sector economy and strong growth.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981652)

-not a druggie

-no crappy job

how does this buffoon manage to be wrong about EVERYTHING. Lol. (Especially given the amount of time he has obviously devoted to thinking about me lol)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981661)

Didn't you see that thread "Blue Smoke doesn't respond to posts that are longer than four sentences long?" Well it's true. I don't have time for that shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37981723)

Notice that I don't use that autistic style that you and fish do where you copy every sentence and response to it individually. This results in you responding to individual petty assertions while avoiding/missing the main point. You do that a lot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37985667)

I DIDN't say anything wrong. And do you really care enough about this board and what the people on here think about you that you feel "embarrassed" when people here to disagree with you? LOL I couldn't give a fuckmwhat people her ten think. If I did I would hav killed myself by no.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37986328)

What main points have I avoided?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37991258)

And it isn't about being "creatively stifled" you homo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3771551&forum_id=2#37987761)