Fun Legal Hypo (Prole Jew Messrs. Fix It Break Shit) - From Talmud Law Class
| galvanic university | 11/06/17 | | spruce senate | 11/06/17 | | galvanic university | 11/06/17 | | rose friendly grandma windowlicker | 11/19/17 | | orchid pungent striped hyena step-uncle's house | 11/06/17 | | abnormal idiotic kitty cat jew | 11/06/17 | | underhanded purple site | 11/06/17 | | galvanic university | 11/06/17 | | underhanded purple site | 11/06/17 | | galvanic university | 11/09/17 | | smoky fragrant base degenerate | 11/10/17 | | galvanic university | 11/19/17 | | Beady-eyed mexican water buffalo | 11/19/17 | | galvanic university | 11/19/17 | | Beady-eyed mexican water buffalo | 11/19/17 | | Beady-eyed mexican water buffalo | 11/19/17 | | galvanic university | 11/19/17 | | glittery stage jap | 12/03/17 | | underhanded purple site | 12/03/17 | | glittery stage jap | 12/17/17 | | galvanic university | 01/05/18 | | glittery stage jap | 01/05/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 6th, 2017 12:15 PM Author: galvanic university
moishe goes to sholmo's store and buys a dozen 2x4's to build his sukkah.
shlomo asks moishe if he wants them delivers. moishe declines, saying he'll load them on his car's roof rack.
moishe loads the poles himself, and then asks one of shlomo's workers to help secure them.
the 2x4's werent properly aligned on the roof rack so the worker helped adjust them so they could be properly secured. in the process, one of the 2x4's falls off the rack and cracks the car mirror.
discuss who may be liable to whom.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787186&forum_id=2#34616860) |
|
Date: November 6th, 2017 12:19 PM Author: orchid pungent striped hyena step-uncle's house
only a FOB would write "wants them delivers" by mistake. lmao @ outing yourself ITT.
--
Date: November 6th, 2017 12:15 PM
Author: David Ben Gurion (*)
moishe goes to sholmo's store and buys a dozen 2x4's to build his sukkah.
shlomo asks moishe if he wants them delivers. moishe declines, saying he'll load them on his car's roof rack.
moishe loads the poles himself, and then asks one of shlomo's workers to help secure them.
the 2x4's werent properly aligned on the roof rack so the worker helped adjust them so they could be properly secured. in the process, one of the 2x4's falls off the rack and cracks the car mirror.
discuss who may be liable to whom.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787186&forum_id=2#34616880) |
Date: November 6th, 2017 12:20 PM Author: underhanded purple site
Moishe waving away help then grabbing some worker prevented Schlomo from properly provisioning labor for damage-free delivery
waives protection?
EDIT:
he received the goods as he originally requested and in agreement with his wishes.
Asked for this one worker help- correcting an error made by Moishe and damage is done. Worker may not have been functioning in the capacity they were hired in and this charity effort was not how Moishe would properly contract for goods with protections.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787186&forum_id=2#34616887) |
Date: November 19th, 2017 12:36 AM Author: Beady-eyed mexican water buffalo
Shlomo ought to have loaded the burden with Moishe.
He is liable for not having helped to load that burden, however Moishe refusing help means that I think no damages are in order.
The workers are liable for nothing.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787186&forum_id=2#34721420) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2017 1:23 AM Author: Beady-eyed mexican water buffalo
Did Shlomo offer to help Moishe load the planks onto his car?
That's really the crux of the matter (Deut 22:4)
Shlomo's delivery could also theoretically be construed as an offer to unload the burden of Moishe. Moishe's refusal of these offers means he is not liable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787186&forum_id=2#34721642) |
Date: January 5th, 2018 3:19 PM Author: galvanic university
RULING:
there are three key questions:
1) whether the worker is a direct or indirect cause of the damage. if he's a direct cause of the damage, he's responsible for both negligent and non-negligent damage and even if it's a total accident. if he's an indirect cause of the damage, he's only responsible if he's negligent.
2) whether the worker is an agent of the store owner, or whether he volunteered his services to the other guy.
3) local custom with this sort of transaction
the ruling isnt really fleshed out beyond that. no answer was given. kinda gay
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787186&forum_id=2#35088968) |
|
|