why are we doing this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700771)

I know this because if a bunch of men came forth accusing women (or other men) of sexual harrassment/sexual assault years ago, feminists/libs would just shrug it off with no fucks given. This recent wave of outrage has little to do with actual outrage and everything to do with the feminists agenda.

However, as long as we have millions of cucks and betas supporting these women, it will continue.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700780)

extreme measures are needed, not flame.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700787)

Until that mentality changes, we will continue to have this sort of thing continue.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700863)

Until that mentality changes, we will continue to have this sort of thing continue. Sad!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700981)

the USSR didn't cede power to a Feminist quarter, or effeminize itself in the process of their (expedient) purges.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700826)

Certainly, there will be more women among the replacements but don't for a second think they won't purge females that don't do what is demanded of them or grow too big for their britches.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701667)

it's not just sleight-of-hand 'marketing' by GC.

in practical day-to-day terms, we will have to live our lives in a world that is increasingly overtly hostile to men. that is the straightforward political goal being served.

tell the guys whose lives have been ruined by the campus rape-tribunals that it was all a 'marketing exercise.'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34702148)

Not exactly. This is being done because certain pols calling the shots (Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Warren, etc.) see this as beneficial to use against their opponents, both inside and outside the party. Back in the day in the USSR, Stalin stoked anti-semitism in part because many of his political opponents in the party were Jews.

To put it another way, you don't see these fuckers giving anything to conservative women, do you? They're just as dismissive of anyone female or minority on the right as they've always been.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34702688)

Also, harassment was sadly more common in decades past. Women who were harassed a few decades ago prob just accepted that ugly fate then, but now are empowered to call it out

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700834)

The average man in society is a beta cuck who is afraid to offend anyone with a vagina and has been conditioned to put women first under any and all circumstances.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700908)

The average man in society is indeed a beta cuck who is afraid to offend anyone with a vagina and has been conditioned to put women first under any and all circumstances.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701048)

all of this stuff has been going on for years, nobody INCLUDING THE WOMEN really cared all that much.

why are we doing this? why?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34700951)

all of this stuff has been going on for years, nobody INCLUDING THE WOMEN really cared all that much.

why are we doing this? why?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34707103)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701086)

Name virtually anything and 9/10, it was created by a man.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701412)

I knew there would be public outrage and waves of high profile accusations as soon as the #metoo bullshit started flying around social media. This gave vapid, self-involved women a way to tie themselves to the nascent 'movement' which, as any lucid person can see, is already far more about demonizing men and gender norms than it is exposing actual perpetrators of sexual assault. Fortunately it has already started to spiral into self-parody and the crazies will keep laying in with false and exaggerated accusations like the woman who just accused Al Franken.

The upside is that they won't be able to repeat this wave of outrage many times, and each new iteration will be increasingly attenuated. It's the shitlib Crusades. The more ominous thing I'm seeing is that millennials evidently have no sense pf pushback or introspection in these moments. If it's a fucking social media campaign, it's legitimate in their eyes and they largely roll over for whatever social agenda is being pushed. I have observed very little discussion of whether this needs to be a narrow examination of fucked up men who prey on people or this hilariously broad indictment of male-dominated culture. The good shitlibs will say it can and SHOULD be both but that's ridiculous. We live in the most PC watchdog culture of male behavior this country has ever maintained. Only a few hyper shitlib European nations approach our level of obsession with policing sexism and male behavior with women. Even so, the young folks don't seem interested in questioning the wisdom of aggressively and publicly prosecuting decades-old bad behavior by a small group of men as some kind of crude proxy for all the terrible shit we have apparently done for all of human history.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701109)

There are some weird as fuck people here. They are the only people I have seen actually come out to defend cretins like Moore and Weinstein and pretend it's all a big load of bullshit made up by the media.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34708114)

Cf. Obama and race relations.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701560)

I do agree it seems silly that lots of men are being dragged into this panic for potentially harmless acts a long time ago (Moore still sounds like a fat pedo). But the proposition that dudes should avoid grabbing a fistful of their female colleagues’ titties without consent doesn’t strike me as particularly crazy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34701880)

Go bust in a wet pussy raw and come back and tell me you still see the world as some zero sum game between men and chicks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34702032)

Are you mid-20s? Do you not work with women? They are different and see things differently. In a lot of areas this is good and helps the world work. When we pretend that there are no differences and we should all put on pants and work soulless office jobs together, it is a net detriment and creates problems.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34702079)

Americans are going to moral panic about something every few years or so, because we're collectively a group of faggot housewives who aren't smart enough to critically evaluate a situation apart from its social viralization. God only knows what it will be next time around.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34702407)

That pumo was right - you guys sound like a bunch of angry virgins who think life is a zero sum game between men and women.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34708138)

We are clearly against violent rape and sexual assault. We are clearly against the overwhelming degeneracy in our society.

But we can also see the bigger picture as well. Not everything does and should rise to the level of being treated as sexual assault. Not everyone should immediately claim to be a victim, because that just waters down the cries of the actual victims.

Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey are pretty clearly perverts who assaulted many women. They're also grade A assholes. That doesn't mean we should live in a society where some woman can publicly claim, not under oath, that 15 years ago some guy smacked her ass in a bar while the rest of society shuns that person. Surely you can see that type of society would be harmful, no?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34708449)

*hies to fainting couch*

The reality is that the US is far safer for women than it has ever been. Yet there is a moral panic over the supposed predations of men. Weinstein et al.'s bad behavior, and it is bad, is a predictable consequence of the liberal and feminist program of loosening sexual mores, mixing the sexes in every setting, and weakening traditional institutions. Moreover, there is just as much opportunistic behavior by women as there is predatorial behavior by men - all the more because the former cannot be aired in public given the climate of opinion, while the latter is such a popular topic accurate accounts are hard to tell from false positives.

So go ahead, indulge in your public shaming of BADMEN and feel superior to others who don't immediately follow along. I find this boart a useful corrective to polite opinion, and reserve my condemnation for my personal life.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34708544)

You think anyone is gonna be dredging up sordid shit from Chris Evans past? Ljl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3799290&forum_id=2#34710353)