Explain to me again why a "Flat Tax" is unfair? Thank
| floppy casino potus | 11/17/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/19/17 | | sable orchestra pit | 11/19/17 | | haunting cruise ship | 11/19/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | French exciting gunner ticket booth | 11/21/17 | | Multi-colored Garnet Theater Stage | 11/21/17 | | honey-headed lascivious deer antler | 11/21/17 | | fantasy-prone chartreuse death wish windowlicker | 11/21/17 | | aquamarine big heaven | 11/21/17 | | cracking chad temple | 11/21/17 | | spectacular hospital | 11/21/17 | | diverse lodge | 11/19/17 | | Brilliant pungent den | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | Brilliant pungent den | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | Brilliant pungent den | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | at-the-ready crackhouse | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | Brilliant pungent den | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | Mint double fault lay | 11/21/17 | | Charismatic trailer park | 11/21/17 | | Ruby arousing mood gay wizard | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | Charismatic trailer park | 11/21/17 | | umber razzle-dazzle persian | 11/21/17 | | opaque reading party | 11/21/17 | | Sexy Alpha | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | Fluffy striped hyena fanboi | 11/21/17 | | ultramarine affirmative action | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | diverse lodge | 11/21/17 | | Stirring pit becky | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | appetizing nubile dysfunction masturbator | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | ultramarine affirmative action | 11/21/17 | | appetizing nubile dysfunction masturbator | 11/21/17 | | Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold | 11/21/17 | | aphrodisiac area doctorate | 11/21/17 | | razzle disrespectful mexican | 11/21/17 | | Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | razzle disrespectful mexican | 11/21/17 | | Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold | 11/21/17 | | Pea-brained unhinged site hominid | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | flickering senate toaster | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | Pea-brained unhinged site hominid | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | ultramarine affirmative action | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | ultramarine affirmative action | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | narrow-minded set pozpig | 11/21/17 | | wonderful bull headed community account stead | 11/21/17 | | ultramarine affirmative action | 11/21/17 | | wonderful bull headed community account stead | 11/21/17 | | diverse lodge | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | diverse lodge | 11/21/17 | | razzle disrespectful mexican | 11/21/17 | | Pea-brained unhinged site hominid | 11/21/17 | | ultramarine affirmative action | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | Smoky mad-dog skullcap piazza | 11/21/17 | | floppy casino potus | 11/21/17 | | appetizing nubile dysfunction masturbator | 11/21/17 | | flickering senate toaster | 11/21/17 | | thriller depressive | 11/21/17 | | diverse lodge | 11/21/17 | | galvanic slap-happy useless brakes | 11/21/17 | | Lake dingle berry degenerate | 11/21/17 | | Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold | 11/21/17 | | flickering senate toaster | 11/21/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 3:12 PM Author: Brilliant pungent den
I provided a standard shitlib response for entertainment purposes only.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Hall-Rabushka tax would be highly regressive, in part because high-income households tend to consume less of their income than lower-income households and because investment income would not be taxed (or rather double-taxed).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34741089)
|
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 3:21 PM Author: Lake dingle berry degenerate
fair enough on your first point
but why bring up a consumption tax when we are talking about income tax? and just because 'tend' exists, a flat tax on consumption is still a flat tax.
investment income should be taxed as income. it is income. that aspect of hall rabushka is fairly considered regressive because it treats different types of income differently, by definition, to the wealthier peoples' benefits
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34741173)
|
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:50 PM Author: ultramarine affirmative action
I'm not taking it that far. It is entirely plausible, for example if taking $200 from a poor just means they can't afford oxy for the next little while vs. taking $200 from a UMC means he isn't gonna enroll his kids in soccer camp.
Let me be clear, I can also formulate many examples going the other way. I just don't like utility arguments like that because unless we are talking about the taking away of basic necessities (we are not) then its a stupid way to approach things.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744697) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:04 PM Author: Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold
IF you believe in an income tax, THEN that tax should tax labor.
Gains in earnings for high income individual generally does not come from labor. Too often, these individuals gain income from capital, not labor.
Special interests will never let this happen, but tcr tax plan would be 0% up to $150k, ~20% up to 500k, and ~70% thereafter. This stat doesn't get pushed hard enough, but we could have 95% of this country pay jack shit and just tax the fuck out of the super rich. The idea that $60k earners should spend a week doing taxes to write an $8k check is absurd.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744403) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:33 PM Author: Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold
Yeah, that's absurd. Not even worth the time to fill out the form, have the government look things over, and deal with collections of back taxes.
And just LOL at the logic that not having skin in the game, or the threat of a higher rate, stopping someone from earning more. 10 out of 10 people will choose to earn more and pay more under ANY tax code.
I'm a huge Trumpmo and the plan in my OP is tcr populist solution.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744569) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:07 PM Author: Pea-brained unhinged site hominid
its not unfair but impractical
there is no good flat tax rate to use unless you are willing to either destroy the federal govt or the poor/lower middle class people
set it too low to not affect the poor/lower middle class and you wont raise enough revenue. set it too high and you are going to make life miserable for people making < 60K or so
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744428) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:20 PM Author: Smoky mad-dog skullcap piazza
Chris Rock summed it up best talking about alimony
"if you make 30 million and the bitch want 15, that's fine you ain't starvin. but if you make 30 thousand and the bitch want half, you just might have to kill her!"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744487) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 10:03 PM Author: Exhilarant water buffalo cuckold
*gets paid 80k in stock options*
One weird trick hehe
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744797) |
|
|