https://globalnews.ca/video/3867811/extended-excerpts-from-secretly-recorded-meeting-between-wilfrid-laurier-university-grad-student-and-faculty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725252)

"you can't make comments based on gender."

*requires mandatory course talking shit on white males*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725294)

That or you didn't go to college and that's why you get perpetually duped by charlatans

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725599)

And critical legal theory isn't total garbage.

I'm not sure if some of this antiscience liberal deconstruction is academic enough yo be critical theory

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725644)

And using "protection" in an argument is like a 95 IQ way of saying "no u"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725980)

Non-sequitur

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35515593)

"CCM students understand and value critical inquiry, social justice, and diversity. Do you ever wonder why your leaders and your media don’t look more like your own community? Do you question images and ideas related to race, class, gender, and sexuality? This humanities-based program may be just the place for you—an exciting and dynamic place to examine popular culture’s influence on ourselves—as well as society."

This isn't Adorno level SCHOLARSHIP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34726018)

the course was "critical communications studies"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725302)

isn't studying Hitler pretty normal?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725321)

Pretty sure it'd be totally normal to read, listen to or study one of Hitler's speeches where he talks about his goals and beliefs even if they're mean or hurt feelings.

And this guy isn't even on the level of Hitler. Nowhere close.

LJL @ the gay guy saying she can't show the video.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34726429)

Administrator: "...that's not necessarily true"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34725390)

That's basically the formula for tyranny/dictatorship. The next step is to apply prosecution selectively to the people opposing those in power.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34727921)

She'll need to find a new career now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34727448)

"And that's kind of the problem."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34727623)

Both sides are crap.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34727800)

thought would say some shit, she would look around the room and find no support, and she would cry and comply like a female

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34727814)

Lib "Man": "And that's not like, something that you'd have an issue with!?!?!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34728001)

https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1442507184p5/3147322.jpg

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAARhAAAAJDllNDg0Y2VjLWYwYzctNGRlOC05MWU4LTUxMTJkM2M5OTViYQ.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34738438)

Specifically, my research addresses topics such as digital intimacies, the relationship of intimacy and privilege, hybridity and mixed-race identities, the social and cultural aspects new media forms, and non/monogamy in the public sphere. It is situated disciplinarily at the nexus of communication and cultural studies; methodologically within discourse analysis; and draws theoretical energy from a wide range of sources such as feminist, queer, postcolonial, and critical race theories; semiotics, affect theory, event theory and psychoanalysis.

My book, Fraught Intimacies: Non/Monogamy in the Public Sphere (UBC Press, 2015) explores the increased mediation of non-monogamies since the early nineties—in every medium from television, to film, to self-help books, to the Internet—and how such convergent mediation opens these discourses up to societal scrutiny, as well as transformation. By exploring the privileged logics that frame our conceptions of intimacy, I explore the political and cultural implications of how we frame non-monogamy broadly in sexual discourse, as well as how the public sphere presences of three major forms of non-monogamy (adultery, polygamy and polyamory) display a complex relationship with “intimate privilege,” an emergent state in which one’s intimacies are read as viable, ethical or even real.

My new research is on the history of digital intimacies. This project investigates the intimate potentials and problematics of social media forms, drawing critical insights from intimacy theory (a subset of queer theory), but extending its ambit to consider multiple forms of digitally mediated togetherness. This project employs discourse analysis in combination with digital humanities methodologies to investigate past, existing, and emerging forms of digitally mediated intimacy. These include such topics as hashtags as technosocial assemblages; MMOs and avatar infidelity; the politics of race-activist hashtags such as #Ferguson; haptics and digital touching; and the emerging sex robot industry. In conjunction with this project I also edited the collection Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks (Digital Formations series, Peter Lang, 2015). This collection investigates the diversity of publics that hashtags address, with politics and positionalities ranging from subcultural and community maintenance; to speaking back to state, corporate and societal power and privilege.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34738515)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35512223)

“From #RaceFail to #Ferguson: Digital Intimacies, Racism and the Politics of Hashtag Publics.” The Fibreculture Journal: Digital Media + Networks + Transdisciplinary Critique 26 (2015). Web.

“Mutt, Monster or Melting-Pot? Mixed-Race Metaphor and Obama’s Ambivalent Hybridity.” Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media and Technology 6 (2015). Web.

“Is Slash an Alternative Medium? ‘Queer’ Heterotopias and the Role of Autonomous Media Space in Radical World Building.” Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action 1.1 (2007). 69-85. Web.

“Uncomfortable Bridges: The Bisexual Politics of Outing Polyamory.” The Journal of Bisexuality 4.3 (2005): 142-154. Print.

“Taking the Leather out of Leathersex: BDSM Identity and the Implications of an Internet-Mediated Sadomasochistic Public Sphere.” GR: Journal For The Arts, Sciences & Technology 2.2 (2004): 39-44. Print.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34738529)

https://globalnews.ca/news/3872966/laurier-university-apology-censorship/

“After listening to this recording, an apology is in order. The conversation I heard does not reflect the values and practices to which Laurier aspires,” the statement from Deborah MacLatchy reads.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#34771011)

Canadians are now worthless.

Canadian laws are inferior.

Trudeau is bought by Soros/Saudi.

Trudeau is both very dumb and evil.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35512212)

open like a whore for any chinese all cash buyer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35514620)

but little girl don't you know that fags rule the roost in humanities departments

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35515828)

Can I see the accusation? No, its confidential.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35515845)

THIS is REAL LIFE bullshit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3802735&forum_id=2#35515951)