The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX
| infuriating swashbuckling area | 11/20/17 |
| Gaped irradiated milk black woman | 11/20/17 |
| primrose boiling water stage | 11/20/17 |
| Overrated provocative site | 11/20/17 |
| Beady-eyed indirect expression | 11/20/17 |
| Overrated provocative site | 11/21/17 |
| aquamarine generalized bond | 11/21/17 |
| clear school coldplay fan | 11/21/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: infuriating swashbuckling area Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore |
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM Author: Gaped irradiated milk black woman What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858) |
 |
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: primrose boiling water stage ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: Overrated provocative site yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.
|
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: Beady-eyed indirect expression Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM Author: Overrated provocative site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM Author: aquamarine generalized bond You have my assurance (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM Author: clear school coldplay fan Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972) |