\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
boyish bonkers church
  11/20/17
What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/...
beta tanning salon azn
  11/20/17
ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial...
green plaza
  11/20/17
yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should...
stirring pontificating juggernaut
  11/20/17
Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
Ivory Laughsome Parlor Water Buffalo
  11/20/17
...
stirring pontificating juggernaut
  11/21/17
You have my assurance
Dull floppy fanboi coffee pot
  11/21/17
Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?
Glittery coiffed address
  11/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM
Author: boyish bonkers church

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731833)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM
Author: beta tanning salon azn

What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: green plaza

ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: stirring pontificating juggernaut

yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731900)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM
Author: Ivory Laughsome Parlor Water Buffalo

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM
Author: stirring pontificating juggernaut



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM
Author: Dull floppy fanboi coffee pot

You have my assurance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM
Author: Glittery coiffed address

Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972)