https://twitter.com/voxdotcom/status/932817095456325633

"Age-of-consent laws that draw a line of sexual maturity at 18 or younger fail to consider the scientific data, which tell us that the teenage brain doesn't fully mature until one's 20s."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736786)

Millennials aren't going to reproduce.

https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/11/daily-chart-14

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736844)

How do those bird brain morons explain that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737632)

For this reason, most dealers will require adult co-signers on major purchases and contracts involving minors. Note that commerce does not come to a grinding halt because of this rule. Minors still make contracts every day with mall retailers and companies like Apple, which sells iTunes music to millions of teenagers — even though minors (children under 18) can void those purchases. But every such purchase carries a risk for the company.

The assumption behind most of these voidable contracts is that parents would agree to the vast majority of the purchases — and companies will take a risk in the few cases where that assumption is wrong. Adults who have sex with minors are not interested in parental permission, however (to say the least). They are grooming these teenagers, enticing them with attention, favors, and presents.

Therefore, drawing on contract law — but not mirroring it exactly — I propose that the law should credit adolescent consent not as legal consent but as legal assent. Legal assent requires no additional parental consent or permission. Yet unlike legal consent, it carries no associated threshold level of legal capacity. That means the granting of assent cannot be used against the teen to insist that she knew what she was doing and should be held legally responsible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736829)

Saudi Arabia got this one right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737664)

I hate to be a MFE on this topic, but have any of these nerds actually fucked a teenage girl? Sure, it's a dirty business, but what you aren't doing is "grooming" them with favors and presents. You're playing on their very developed, and very peculiar, sexuality that generates a proclivity for older men. It's generally rooted in some kind of negative history, sexual or otherwise, with men.

There may be some men who successfully bag the 80% of teenage girls who want nothing to do with older men, but for the most part we're all dipping our wicks in the 20% of girls who do with no grooming required.

Someone needs to acknowledge this fact if we're ever going to take this discussion seriously.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738094)

should have been called "Wouldn't Rape Traps Be Fun?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736841)

Doobs, explain this shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736855)

The voiding or revocation would not take place automatically, however. A court would review an adolescent’s revocation of assent and make a “best interests” analysis in deciding whether to validate the revocation. (Judges consider the “best interests” of minors regularly in divorce custody cases, for instance.) Most if not all courts will conclude that an adult having sex with a minor is not in a minor’s best interests; therefore, the court is likely to find that Doe may revoke her assent to sex with Troy. Doe’s parents may then sue Troy for Doe’s injuries (since she does not have the legal capacity to sue in her own name)."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736847)

Men universally prefer women who are in their teens or early 20s, and dried up bitter shrews hate to see men their own age get with younger hotter tighter nicer cutie pies.

There is no real reason to outlaw sex robots either, but women are already pushing for that, too (I believe they are illegal in the UK).

It is the pussy cartel. They want to use THE LAW to force you to fuck dried up feminist striver shrew leftovers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736866)

I can't take this. I'm in the fucking Twilight Zone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34736888)

Here’s how I imagine it working. Suppose Jane Doe (16) gives legal assent to sex with Troy (30). That assent is legally binding, but would be unilaterally revocable. If the minor concludes that the sex was exploitative, before she reaches 18 (or 19 or 20), she could void her assent. (Parents could not void a minor’s assent for her, under this system.)

The voiding or revocation would not take place automatically, however. A court would review an adolescent’s revocation of assent and make a “best interests” analysis in deciding whether to validate the revocation. (Judges consider the “best interests” of minors regularly in divorce custody cases, for instance.) Most if not all courts will conclude that an adult having sex with a minor is not in a minor’s best interests; therefore, the court is likely to find that Doe may revoke her assent to sex with Troy. Doe’s parents may then sue Troy for Doe’s injuries (since she does not have the legal capacity to sue in her own name).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737098)

@zpickle90

2h2 hours ago

More

Replying to @voxdotcom

But a child can decide its gender? Got it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737151)

i want violence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737161)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/eight-women-say-charlie-rose-sexually-harassed-them--with-nudity-groping-and-lewd-calls/2017/11/20/9b168de8-caec-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.8b8a0651ca01

My favorite bit is he got out of the shower naked in front of them. If they weren't there to have sex with him why were they in his apartment when he was in the shower at all? I have been working for over a dozen years. I have never had a coworker over to my house or apartment and I would assume any that would want to come over would only do so for sex.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737848)

Guys at 14 are ready to pop loads every 5 seconds.

Would eliminate so much violence in society if people could have sex moar freely. RAGING boners.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737904)

Ugly dyke feminists won't stop until all sex with attractive women is outlawed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34737930)

https://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/2014/10/articles/body/20141011_fbp006.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738380)

" the teenage brain doesn't fully mature until one's 20s."

a 19 year old doesn't become older until he turns 20. Wow, mind blown

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738138)

*blank stare*.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738160)

So clearly if they can't consent to sex on these grounds, then surely we can't have them vote, yes?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738245)

This should apply for both sexes. An appropriate age differential should be an allowed exception against claims of statutory tape ( Ex: 17 yo with a 19 yo)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738414)

Just like how, if a sober person has sex with a drunk person, the sober one is a rapist. But if they're both drunk, that's just kooky fun.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804308&forum_id=2#34738455)