what would the Confederate South be like today, if it had seceded
| Pale pozpig | 11/21/17 | | Stubborn Magenta Set | 11/21/17 | | amber filthpig senate | 11/21/17 | | vigorous bright native prole | 11/21/17 | | Big-titted idiotic range weed whacker | 11/21/17 | | orange brunch stain | 11/21/17 | | Arousing crimson shrine | 11/21/17 | | magical chrome whorehouse | 11/21/17 | | exhilarant cordovan address juggernaut | 11/21/17 | | Comical crystalline heaven | 11/21/17 | | Stubborn Magenta Set | 11/21/17 | | Arousing crimson shrine | 11/22/17 | | painfully honest area | 11/21/17 | | Electric sooty hall | 11/21/17 | | odious theater | 11/21/17 | | Stubborn Magenta Set | 11/21/17 | | Pale pozpig | 11/21/17 | | Big orchestra pit death wish | 11/21/17 | | Stubborn Magenta Set | 11/21/17 | | silver histrionic legal warrant | 11/21/17 | | painfully honest area | 11/21/17 | | sienna razzmatazz base | 11/21/17 | | Vibrant voyeur | 11/21/17 | | bronze spot | 11/21/17 | | sienna razzmatazz base | 11/21/17 | | vigorous bright native prole | 11/21/17 | | sienna razzmatazz base | 11/21/17 | | Pale pozpig | 11/21/17 | | lime stirring hospital | 11/22/17 | | cerebral keepsake machete | 11/21/17 | | Arousing crimson shrine | 11/21/17 | | vigorous bright native prole | 11/21/17 | | Arousing crimson shrine | 11/21/17 | | vigorous bright native prole | 11/21/17 | | sienna razzmatazz base | 11/21/17 | | Laughsome costumed genital piercing | 11/22/17 | | bateful locale | 11/21/17 | | mischievous emerald quadroon ticket booth | 11/21/17 | | magical chrome whorehouse | 11/21/17 | | Vibrant voyeur | 11/22/17 | | lime stirring hospital | 11/22/17 | | Shimmering tantric cruise ship | 11/22/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 4:18 PM Author: Stubborn Magenta Set
would be fucking off the chain.
we'd have lower taxes because we wouldn't have to subsidize the pitiful south.
we'd have a better economy, more sane laws.
major concern would be way less internal vacation spots. but it would be well worth it to not be associated with southern folk.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34741755) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 4:34 PM Author: bronze spot
If they had peacefully succeeded, probably pretty sweet considering the cotton trade accounted for something like 60% of the national GDP. My guess: The South would be in the economic/ military position that the US as a whole is in is today, with the northern states being like a second layer of Canada. EDIT: slavery eventually gets abolished and race relations are as peaceful as they are in Brazil.
If they had succeeded in '64 after much of their economy was destroyed and incurring the war debt, The South probably doesn't end up quite as well, but still much better than having to suffer through 30 years of military occupation, disenfranchisement, and reconstruction.
If we succeeded today, 180x180.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34741924) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 5:54 PM Author: Arousing crimson shrine
You are fucking insane.
The South was dirt poor when it started the War. They couldn't even afford to give their Soldiers SHOES TO WEAR INTO BATTLE, let alone sustain their own population.
The South thought that Europe would have their back in the War because they thought "Cotton was King".
Europe said, "DINGFAG!" and got their cotton elsewhere, thus significantly decreasing the importance the region had.
You think the North would allow the South to just "peacefully" walk away with all of their shit still within their borders?
Then you still have the unresolved issue of expansion into the West. Would the North "peacefully" allow the South to expand its territory into the West without any fight?
What about global issues? Would the North & South agreed to support the same sides in WWI/WWII? What about the territories and bases the US gained as a result of the various global conflicts? Would the North just say, You can take the Philippines and all the oil it has! NBD"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34742723) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 6:00 PM Author: Arousing crimson shrine
That guy is full of shit:
"The proof that this reason was not sincere is that the abolitionists spent millions in order to incite insurrections among the slaves, or to induce them to flee from their masters, but let them die of hunger because they were free, and gave them no opportunity for moral advancement."
Millions to incite insurrections?
So abolitionist spent millions on John Brown and Nat Turner?
lol!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34742773) |
|
|