POLL: would you be in favor of racial segregation?
| exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | lascivious depressive | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Chocolate sanctuary | 11/23/17 | | learning disabled burgundy famous landscape painting | 11/22/17 | | Chocolate sanctuary | 11/23/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | appetizing liquid oxygen principal's office | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | hilarious insanely creepy headpube | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/22/17 | | Irradiated bearded wagecucks | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Boyish step-uncle's house | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Yellow half-breed set | 11/22/17 | | Titillating Business Firm | 11/23/17 | | Snowy submissive elastic band | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | Zippy useless becky dilemma | 11/22/17 | | exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | Stimulating place of business | 11/22/17 | | lascivious depressive | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | pearly motley tattoo shrine | 11/22/17 | | Plum Indecent Site | 11/22/17 | | pearly motley tattoo shrine | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | pearly motley tattoo shrine | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Citrine Dysfunction Church Building | 11/22/17 | | pearly motley tattoo shrine | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | adulterous ivory abode national security agency | 11/22/17 | | Plum Indecent Site | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | adulterous ivory abode national security agency | 11/22/17 | | Plum Indecent Site | 11/22/17 | | adulterous ivory abode national security agency | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | adulterous ivory abode national security agency | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Dull bateful main people menage | 11/22/17 | | startling boiling water | 11/22/17 | | lascivious depressive | 11/22/17 | | Floppy Mediation Partner | 11/22/17 | | exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | Violent Temple | 11/22/17 | | chrome cumskin hissy fit | 11/22/17 | | filthy ocher karate philosopher-king | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | Snowy submissive elastic band | 11/22/17 | | pearly motley tattoo shrine | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | Fishy slimy jap heaven | 11/22/17 | | filthy ocher karate philosopher-king | 11/22/17 | | demanding multi-colored friendly grandma | 11/22/17 | | Umber Lettuce Sound Barrier | 11/22/17 | | exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/22/17 | | adulterous ivory abode national security agency | 11/22/17 | | Ebony crotch immigrant | 11/23/17 | | exhilarant cuckoldry | 11/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:52 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
I'm in favor of repealing laws making it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race in the real estate context. Let people decide for themselves who they want to live with.
If a neighborhood wants to be explicitly white and not rent or sell to blacks or other minorities, that's their right. Same goes for all races.
This is the free market solution, not government imposed segregation.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749733) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
Nice strawman.
Reread what I said. A property owner should have the right to decide who he wants to sell or rent to. If a group of people want to live in a neighborhood of a particular race, that should also be their right.
If you don't like it, don't move to that neighborhood.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749822) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:17 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
It is social engineering for the government to intervene and forcibly impose limits on who you can sell or rent your property to, in an attempt to create more integration.
If you are renting out your apartment, it's your money on the line. That's enough incentive not to rent to trash of any race. If you want to further prefer to rent to your race, that should be your right.
Likewise, the free market will ensure that a black or Mexican doctor making $275k will be able to purchase property. I'm sure there are plenty of property owners who would be happy to find such a buyer, including many whites. But if a white guy is faced with such a buyer and choose not to sell, holding out for a white who can afford his property, that should also be his right. He's the one hurt if he can't find a white buyer.
I'm not saying that every white should exclude every black. Just that every race should have the right to choose who they sell or rent to, because they face the consequences. The government has no right intruding on private property ownership as they do.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750013) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:28 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
No, this is another strawman of yours. I'm not talking about Section 8 housing.
I'm talking about two distinct concepts:
1. A property owner currently cannot turn down applicants on the basis of race. Section 8 is a subset, but take that out of the picture and the prohibition remains.
2. Neighborhoods cannot be created explicitly designed for a particular race.
Both prohibitions/restrictions on private property ownership should be abolished, for the reasons just described.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750113) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: Zippy useless becky dilemma
?
You need more than skin color if you're going to discriminate. If you're so adamant about said person being a danger, you can start digging for criminal records, poor rental history, poor job history, etc.
Just admit you're lazy and would rather just look and say "ugh...BLACKS!" than actually do any research to at least try to justify why they shouldn't be there. Also, if you're worried about criminals moving in next door or up the street, you may want to improve your income situation as your concerns are pretty much the concerns that lower income folks have. I don't know of anyone solidly middle/upper middle class who has had issues with dangerous people moving in next door or up the street; it's only been folks with little money complaining.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750054) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:36 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
And if that's the case, removing the prohibitions on discriminating based on race shouldn't have much of an impact.
We don't start from the standpoint of having government restrictions on private property ownership, removing them only if there's a valid reason. We start with a hands off approach, only imposing such prohibitions if there's an incredibly compelling reason.
You've got the order backwards, and since even you concede what I advocate won't make much of a practical impact (aside from giving the owner more choice), the prohibitions should be removed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750211) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:43 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
How dumb are you?
I already explained that you are reversing the burden. It's not my burden to come up with a legitimate reason to remove a ridiculous restriction on private property ownership.
It's your burden to demonstrate why the prohibitions should be imposed to begin with. So far, you've failed miserably, essentially conceding there AREN'T any reasons since people won't follow them anyway.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750276) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:47 PM Author: Fishy slimy jap heaven
No, you already admitted the protections are not needed since people will come up with pretexts and discriminate anyway.
I also explained that many of people would buy or rent to a black doctor making $275k anyway. Your notion that removing the prohibitions would result in such a person being blocked out of nice areas is unfounded speculation.
You are restricting the freedom of private property owners to utilize their property for no legitimate reason.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750312) |
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:56 PM Author: demanding multi-colored friendly grandma
Not government imposed. I'm against government power.
BUT, the government also should not STOP people from self-segregating.
EG. Racial restrictive covenants shuold be legal and enforceable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749766) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:12 PM Author: pearly motley tattoo shrine
what is the max IQ to unironically think that private citizens exercising arbitrary discrimination based on *anything* is inherently bad?
like 103?
have you ever independently thought about this subject matter for more than 30-40 seconds?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749974) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: chrome cumskin hissy fit
lol I have at least 20 IQ points on you
you are the board laughingstock on a board full of people who agree with you politically
LJL
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750059) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:28 PM Author: chrome cumskin hissy fit
ty
I wear it proudly
I also never say sexist or homophobic things
I am an outted poster and I don't have to hide behind everything I say like a little bitch
meanwhile the xo racists would NEVER have the guts to say any of this stuff IRL because they're punks
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750112) |
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:25 PM Author: Snowy submissive elastic band
complete freedom of association
incentivization of traditional families
pre-1965 immigration policy
defund all non-stem faculites in universities
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750088) |
|
|