If a neighborhood wants to be explicitly white and not rent or sell to blacks or other minorities, that's their right. Same goes for all races.

This is the free market solution, not government imposed segregation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749733)

Reread what I said. A property owner should have the right to decide who he wants to sell or rent to. If a group of people want to live in a neighborhood of a particular race, that should also be their right.

If you don't like it, don't move to that neighborhood.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749822)

And the government goes after property owners for not renting to blacks all the time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749862)

"Well, your skin is dark, so therefore, I refuse to rent this property to you."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749884)

he doesn't need further justification

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749901)

nothing more to see, move along

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749946)

It is your property and you should have the right to sell or rent it as you see fit. The government should not be interfering with private property ownership in pursuit of social engineering.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749929)

Just say you hate blacks or whatever because there are plenty of ways to keep certain undesirables out of a neighborhood without race getting involved. The most obvious being the price of the property.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749948)

Social engineering is when government makes it possible for those who normally wouldn't be able to move into certain neighborhoods move there. However, a white collar professional with an income comparable to everyone else in the neighborhood looking to buy or rent isn't social engineering.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750010)

If you are renting out your apartment, it's your money on the line. That's enough incentive not to rent to trash of any race. If you want to further prefer to rent to your race, that should be your right.

Likewise, the free market will ensure that a black or Mexican doctor making $275k will be able to purchase property. I'm sure there are plenty of property owners who would be happy to find such a buyer, including many whites. But if a white guy is faced with such a buyer and choose not to sell, holding out for a white who can afford his property, that should also be his right. He's the one hurt if he can't find a white buyer.

I'm not saying that every white should exclude every black. Just that every race should have the right to choose who they sell or rent to, because they face the consequences. The government has no right intruding on private property ownership as they do.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750013)

I'm talking about two distinct concepts:

1. A property owner currently cannot turn down applicants on the basis of race. Section 8 is a subset, but take that out of the picture and the prohibition remains.

2. Neighborhoods cannot be created explicitly designed for a particular race.

Both prohibitions/restrictions on private property ownership should be abolished, for the reasons just described.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750113)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&mc=99&forum_id=2#34750211

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750218)

LOL man, don't start conflating you neckbeard 'principles' with how life moves on the ground. giving private citizens the ability to discriminate based on race for shit like housing is a terrible idea for a dozen different reasons that i won't even bother detailing. i have some openly racist leanings due to sheer personal interest that I'm willing to cop to, but only 110 IQs seriously think the shit you're advocating for is 1) feasible, and 2) anything other than a terrible idea for all parties and interests.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34751333)

You need more than skin color if you're going to discriminate. If you're so adamant about said person being a danger, you can start digging for criminal records, poor rental history, poor job history, etc.

Just admit you're lazy and would rather just look and say "ugh...BLACKS!" than actually do any research to at least try to justify why they shouldn't be there. Also, if you're worried about criminals moving in next door or up the street, you may want to improve your income situation as your concerns are pretty much the concerns that lower income folks have. I don't know of anyone solidly middle/upper middle class who has had issues with dangerous people moving in next door or up the street; it's only been folks with little money complaining.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750054)

You're just racist and therefore desperate to exercise your racism whenever possible just because. You haven't provided one good reason why discriminating solely on the basis of race is necessary.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750165)

We don't start from the standpoint of having government restrictions on private property ownership, removing them only if there's a valid reason. We start with a hands off approach, only imposing such prohibitions if there's an incredibly compelling reason.

You've got the order backwards, and since even you concede what I advocate won't make much of a practical impact (aside from giving the owner more choice), the prohibitions should be removed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750211)

People have proven over and over that when the govt doesn't impose certain laws, people will do whatever they want regardless of whether or not their actions are justified out of pure hatred. That's exactly when removing prohibitions should not be done....the average person can't be trusted to act responsibly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750232)

Face it, you want to impose totalitarian tendencies on people you don't agree with (racists) in an attempt to force them to do what you want. There's no other reason to advocate for these prohibitions which even you concede aren't very effective.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750246)

If you can't come up with something beyond "I HATE NIGGERS", there's nothing more to discuss.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750257)

I already explained that you are reversing the burden. It's not my burden to come up with a legitimate reason to remove a ridiculous restriction on private property ownership.

It's your burden to demonstrate why the prohibitions should be imposed to begin with. So far, you've failed miserably, essentially conceding there AREN'T any reasons since people won't follow them anyway.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750276)

By you removing such prohibitions, you're doing away with freedom and liberty for no legitimate reason....and hating "niggers" isn't a legitimate reason.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750289)

I also explained that many of people would buy or rent to a black doctor making $275k anyway. Your notion that removing the prohibitions would result in such a person being blocked out of nice areas is unfounded speculation.

You are restricting the freedom of private property owners to utilize their property for no legitimate reason.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750312)

Sure, if you could guarantee that everyone in America would exercise objectively good judgment, then doing away with prohibitions would be fine...but that's not the case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750333)

BUT, the government also should not STOP people from self-segregating.

EG. Racial restrictive covenants shuold be legal and enforceable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749766)

normal (white) people have never read through what the legislation actually does. they've just been fed decades of propaganda and assume that it must have "helped stop racism" or something equally vague, nebulous, and inaccurate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749899)

like 103?

have you ever independently thought about this subject matter for more than 30-40 seconds?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749974)

Here's proof:

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3727466&mc=29&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750037)

you are the board laughingstock on a board full of people who agree with you politically

LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750059)

we are both smarter than you and lawman

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750082)

why would I care what you think?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749961)

If it's legal for you to choose to not fuck a guy because he's not a chad, it should be legal for me to choose to not rent to a person because he's a Mestizo subhuman.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750263)

it's ok Chad>>>politics

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750294)

anyone cucking on the race question ITT will be barred from office in the ethnostate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750060)

I wear it proudly

I also never say sexist or homophobic things

I am an outted poster and I don't have to hide behind everything I say like a little bitch

meanwhile the xo racists would NEVER have the guts to say any of this stuff IRL because they're punks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750112)

incentivization of traditional families

pre-1965 immigration policy

defund all non-stem faculites in universities

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750088)