You're incapable of quantifying the effect, yet claim it's critical and I'm the moron

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34829514)

boomers didn't save for retirement and have diabetes

Land is very expensive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830611)

You really are dumb as fuck, huh?

https://tpwd.texas.gov/huntwild/wild/nuisance/feral_hogs/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830500)

Do you have any sense of how nature works? There's no fucking difference if there are 30 million deer and 10 million rabbits or 50 million rabbits and 5 million deer besides faggot hunters looking for a reason to shoot shit. You'd think hunter "naturalists" would understand ecological equilibrium.

And lol at texas.com/nra/shootanimalshere.html.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830633)

Not sure why you think the Texas park and wildlife department doesn't value human life so can't respond on that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830798)

Given that current deer populations rival those of pre-European settlement, the short term "starvation costs" have likely already been incurred and are at equilibrium. There is therefore no overriding interest in violence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830997)

Sorry, this is a totally uncompelling moral account. The idea that there's a moral obligation not to quickly kill an animal with a gun but letting animals starve has no moral dimension is convincing to nobody. But I'm glad that we've identified the faulty moral premise that underlies your whole stupid idea so that it's clear to everyone where you went wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34831031)

Even at equilibrium a certain percentage of the population will starve every year. That's how animal death works. And that's why responsible hunting doesnt decimate animal populations and they don't go down every year. They would just starve anyway.

And lol at you abandoning your piss poor moral argument for a piss poor practical argument now. You're done here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34831091)

And local arguments from starvation are even weaker than national arguments. Now you're not only talking about unpredictable yearly variations in populations sizes and inaccurate predictions but small likelihoods of successful management.

Deer management in California has been a total failure for example and is causing runaway population decline.

All to the point that you should leave nature alone, and that the possible but unpredictable starvation of a small number of other wild animals is not justification for overt violence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34831218)

Point me to where Texas quantifies the number of animals saved from starvation vs animals hunted please.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34831254)

The deer population in 2000 was the same as it was in the 1700s, and likely any period prior to European settlement.

If you think fat faggot hunters are going to kill deer at remotely the rate that caused the decline in the 1800s you're a moron

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830775)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830797)

This video explains it well, but the jist of it is that muscles are being constantly told to not move by the brain, and when the brain stops sending that signal the reserves of ATP are consumed and the muscles contract.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1INVWP-HnI

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830376)

hes just telling us he is a superior predator to those two geeks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830407)

And the shot was fine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830254)

Nothing in the law that says a deer can't practice law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34830447)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2103659&forum_id=2#24740454

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34853437)

PATHETIC

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34832596)

All the utilitarian defenses and factory farming tu quoques in the world don't change that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3816687&forum_id=2#34880527)