Historically important poaster ACP here, taking Qs on crypto, CFB, lifts, women
| chocolate karate station | 12/09/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/09/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/09/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/09/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/09/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/09/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | bat-shit-crazy location | 12/09/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/09/17 | | bat-shit-crazy location | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | bat-shit-crazy location | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | bat-shit-crazy location | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | thriller whorehouse | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | thriller whorehouse | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | thriller whorehouse | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | bat-shit-crazy location | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Sepia senate dingle berry | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Sepia senate dingle berry | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Sepia senate dingle berry | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Sepia senate dingle berry | 12/10/17 | | Anal lay useless brakes | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Anal lay useless brakes | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Sepia senate dingle berry | 12/10/17 | | Anal lay useless brakes | 12/10/17 | | Sepia senate dingle berry | 12/10/17 | | Anal lay useless brakes | 12/10/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/10/17 | | Rusted Federal Center | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Anal lay useless brakes | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Anal lay useless brakes | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | exhilarant crotch | 12/10/17 | | Translucent vigorous point | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 | | Translucent vigorous point | 12/10/17 | | mildly autistic canary space | 12/10/17 | | chocolate karate station | 12/10/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:00 AM Author: chocolate karate station
eventually they fuck up the shoes but I never did just ~1inch so you might be OK; I would monitor your shoes and if they show signs of extra wear, well, then you know
I really like the tall men shoes lifts because how they're built into the shoe, but none are as small as 1", I think
lifts are like the topping of a salad: they don't make you tall, they're just an extra "lift" like make up on a woman or a pushup bra, just a little "extra" to help you in this competitive world
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34879876) |
|
Date: December 9th, 2017 11:59 PM Author: chocolate karate station
no but they get to have H on their resume and it's about the prestige of H; no one would argue you're a Harvard graduate, but you're basically an affiliate alumni and you can legitimately say you "studied" at H and completed a program there
XO aspies don't understand the psychological effect this has on hiring committees and proles -- they don't treat it like HBS but you get to scrape pieces of prestige and plaster it on you
and IMO H is actually an unreasonable place to do a certificate; you can get better, cheaper ones at Stanford and Northwestern and the more you aim for a "reasonable" place (e.g. a T25 school vs T3) their alumni are less likely to fight you on whether you "attended," because they don't have such a stick up their butt about protecting their elite status
my argument is that anyone who lacks an elite school degree, in a credentialist obsessed society, has ever incentive to spend the small amount of $ (less than 10K) to get the NAME of at least ONE prestige school on their resume, no matter how unrelated to their field
but obviously something tangentially related to your work would be cr
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34879869) |
|
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:03 AM Author: chocolate karate station
I think H extension is a unique outlier and it's hard to say: H students protect H prestige so much that H extension might actually backfire with H grads but it def. works with proles and is worth the time to say you went to H ...
I think a degree is always > a cert because you get the official title of MA or whatever
but think about it: for a fraction of the cost, time, and effort, you can get a certificate from a prestigious school and get IMHO 50-75% of the same effect on hiring officials, lay people, your grandparents who want you to succeed
"yeah, I just completed a program at stanford"
xo shits on that, "oh they'll see right through it!" WRONG, boomers don't get it, don't care, people don't give a shit they just want to quickly filter you in a box ("prestigious or not")
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34879893) |
|
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:23 AM Author: chocolate karate station
cost benefit analysis my nigga
there was a guy weighing Georgia Tech vs Stanford on XO .... GT was 8K Stanford was 70K or something and imho you do GT b/c dat cash and maybe cop a S certificate for a dash of prestige
the fact is, if you need it in a non-legal field or non-prestige field, then it doesn't matter; I mean, doctors aren't like oh, fuck, an Ohio State MD? I know plenty of NU kids that would have LOVED to get into OSU for medical school
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34880001) |
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:34 AM Author: Sepia senate dingle berry
You can waive a wand to create two federal laws to help save our cumstained futon of a nation for future generations of hardworking Americans. Assume they will stay in place for at least 15-20 years.
Laws have to be somewhat feasible and constitutional (never going to get away with 'No Muslims, period' LOL). The laws can obviously be complicated or broad like HIPPA or ACA or something so long as it can be summarized in a few sentences.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34880056) |
|
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:38 AM Author: chocolate karate station
Congressional term limits of 2 years per member of House, 3 years per member of the Senate w/ no re-election for life in any federal office. People will actually look to greater good and worry less about raising $$$ and winning the next election.
Move some DOD spending and create legitimate universal health care saving proles massive amounts of $$$ in health bills and giving them jobs as well in an even more hot field than it is now
I might change #2 but I'll stand by #1
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34880087)
|
|
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:49 AM Author: chocolate karate station
I don't know what major campaign finance reform looks like unless we have federal funding of elections and that has plenty of problems
We need a substantially better definition of lobbying because they just do "consulting"
but that said I can get around this as a compromise position; generally I think we need less safe seat Paul Ryan's out there, so maybe also some work on gerrymandering
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34880160) |
|
Date: December 10th, 2017 12:56 AM Author: Anal lay useless brakes
lol
you dont need a gentlemans estate in pristine rural america. a middle class bro making 75K~100K in rural colorado (there a bunch of small towns with 5000~10000 people) has MAED it. its not a binary choice - gentlemans estate with a ranch or trailer park
please tell me how you are never far from nature in MFH as you rub shoulders with 100,000 other people in central park on labor day weekend
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3823405&forum_id=2#34880190) |
|
|