\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Any good somewhat objective primers on Net Neutrality? Libs melting down on SM

I am woefully uninformed on this topic and all I see are hys...
smoky tank tanning salon
  12/15/17
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRF36EaVoAIqqtB.jpg:large
Glittery yapping abode hairy legs
  12/15/17
...
aqua mewling stag film
  12/15/17
If libs are melting down you know it’s fucking horseshit. ...
Magical Corn Cake
  12/15/17
...
twinkling brunch karate
  12/15/17
...
crawly maize stage
  12/15/17
...
Magical Corn Cake
  12/15/17
...
Duck-like stirring alpha
  12/15/17
This should tell you all you need to know http://www.wash...
bistre arrogant rigor
  12/15/17
...
Magical Corn Cake
  12/15/17
do you want private companies like comcast blocking based on...
crawly maize stage
  12/15/17
https://www.allsides.com/story/fcc-votes-overturn-net-neutra...
appetizing nighttime center old irish cottage
  12/15/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 4:15 AM
Author: smoky tank tanning salon

I am woefully uninformed on this topic and all I see are hysterical libs melting down over NN on my social media feeds.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34925052)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 4:38 PM
Author: Glittery yapping abode hairy legs

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRF36EaVoAIqqtB.jpg:large

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929264)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 4:39 PM
Author: aqua mewling stag film



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929271)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 4:39 PM
Author: Magical Corn Cake

If libs are melting down you know it’s fucking horseshit.

Not even being flip. I firmly believe this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929272)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 4:41 PM
Author: twinkling brunch karate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929294)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:16 PM
Author: crawly maize stage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929573)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:17 PM
Author: Magical Corn Cake



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929577)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:18 PM
Author: Duck-like stirring alpha



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929585)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:17 PM
Author: bistre arrogant rigor

This should tell you all you need to know

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929580)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:18 PM
Author: Magical Corn Cake



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929582)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:20 PM
Author: crawly maize stage

do you want private companies like comcast blocking based on bandwidth usage or do you want the federal government blocking based on content?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929596)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 5:20 PM
Author: appetizing nighttime center old irish cottage

https://www.allsides.com/story/fcc-votes-overturn-net-neutrality-regulations

From the right:

The level of panic set off by the end of net neutrality is utterly out of proportion to the actual effect that end is likely to have. The basic debate over net neutrality is actually a reasonable one: is the best way to ensure a better internet for consumers to ban internet service providers (ISPs) from charging certain content providers more for their use of bandwidth than others, or is it to free ISPs to charge what they want, thereby incentivizing ISPs to compete with one another to offer different services at different prices?

On the one hand, there are those who argue that the current ISP oligopoly that exists in many areas of the country must be curbed to prevent monopolistic practices; on the other hand, there are those who argue that regulating ISPs as public utilities prevents new, small ISPs from entering the market, and stops current oligopoly beneficiaries from investing in new technology to forestall such competition. Ajit Pai, current head of the FCC, argues that “among our nation’s 12 largest Internet service providers, domestic broadband capital expenditures decreased by 5.6%, or $3.6 billion, between 2014 and 2016, the first two years of the Title II era.” For making this point, Pai has been subjected to serious threats to safety.

This is a reasonable debate. Here’s what’s not reasonable: the suggestion that your internet use is likely to change radically from what it was in 2015, before net neutrality went into effect. Here’s what else isn’t reasonable: people of the Left who think that Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter operate fine in the free market, and that consumers don’t have to worry about discrimination thanks to open competition, but that the same doesn’t apply to ISPs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929597)