TRUMP needs to take the belt to these congressfags and tell them NO MORE CUCKY TREATS until there's a wall on every inch of our border and a university cosigner on every one of our student loans.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830649&forum_id=2#34931430)

People stop thinking in terms of Republicans vs. Democrats.

In reality, the lines are Corporate Globalists vs. Populist Nationalists.

Both the Dems and Cuck GOP are globalists. That's why you'll find companies like Comcast that donate a ton to each.

Candidate Trump was a Populist Nationalist. But much of his agenda so far has been Corporate Globalist in nature (repeal Obamacare, tremendously slash taxes for the wealthy, repeal net neutrality, Paul Ryan already said gutting entitlements is first in line for 2018).

This is no accident; it's because he's a fool being played by the cucks. They know that his keys to success are getting his Populist Nationalist proposals through (infrastructure project, to a lesser extent, the Wall), and this is why they are deliberately making no effort to do any of that. Instead, they are using him to pass their own agenda and hope to toss him overboard when his base gets disaffected by what's happening.

Because unlike him, they know full well that swing state working class voters won't really be too enthusiastic about what they are pushing. They're probably promising Trump behind closed doors that they'll get around to his Populist Nationalist priorities after this stuff gets done first, but in reality are hoping to wait out the clock.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830649&forum_id=2#34931456)

I hope it's not that TRUMP's getting played so much as that this is just the natural consequence of having a congress full of cucks: the easiest (and thus far only) things to pass are those few areas where TRUMP's views are cucky (I use Bannon, not TRUMP, as the model for what *substantive* positions are nationalist). I have detected a shift among some of the GOP's extremists from teatard bullshit to more nationalist rhetoric. It's obviously not genuine (but what ever is with politicians), but it'd be usable but for (a) the razor-thin GOP margin in the Senate; and (b) unapologetic uber-cucks like that shameless gay-face Nebraska FAGGOT who don't face election for another 3-5 years.

It really makes you marvel at how our constitutional system is not easily overtaken by popular "movements". It takes a sustained sentiment over multiple election cycles -- during which time the electorate isn't going to see much in the way of results -- to make real changes, and even longer if and to the extent that the judiciary's cooperation is needed. That hurts libs 9 times out of 10 (e.g., our New Deal wasn't nearly as comprehensive as most euro countries' WWII-era social revamps) but it's fucking us now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830649&forum_id=2#34931620)