The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
What IS a motion in limine?
| Rough-skinned background story | 12/16/17 |
| snowy motley digit ratio lodge | 12/16/17 |
| fishy blood rage brethren | 01/09/19 |
| stirring sticky temple | 01/09/19 |
| Slate electric center | 01/09/19 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 16th, 2017 12:31 AM Author: Rough-skinned background story Penis of luis? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830797&forum_id=2#34932493) |
Date: December 16th, 2017 7:21 AM Author: snowy motley digit ratio lodge "Limine" is Latin for "threshold." A motion in limine ("MIL") is a motion to exclude evidence or argument before it is considered by the factfinder; that is, "at the threshold" of trial. In federal court, MIL's are governed by Fed. R. Evid. 104(a), which provides "[t]he court must decide any preliminary question about whether ... evidence is admissible[,]... [i]n so deciding, the court is not bound by evidence rules, except those on privilege." In other words, the court can consider inadmissible evidence in ruling whether evidence is admissible; without this rule, it would be impossible to consider the challenged evidence.
It's the ultimate burden of the proponent of the evidence to establish its admissibility. You can move in limine to establish evidence is admissible or (much more commonly) inadmissible. When you move to show evidence is inadmissible, it's your burden to establish inadmissibility. If your argument is evidence is irrelevant, you must show it's irrelevant on all possible grounds. Conversely, if you're moving to show evidence is admissible, it's your burden to show it's admissible for at least one purpose. Once admitted, it is typically for the jury to decide what to make of evidence, so getting it in for one purpose is as good as any; that said, you may in some instances draw a jury instruction, or else be limited in how you can argue about a piece of evidence.
There's much more to say on the subject but I think this is a decent primer to start. |
|
Date: January 9th, 2019 1:06 PM Author: fishy blood rage brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830797&forum_id=2#37559429) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2019 1:10 PM Author: stirring sticky temple you spend a shitton of time on it and argue about it while you should be prepping witnesses then the judge just takes it under advisement and it all comes in anyway (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830797&forum_id=2#37559475) |
 |
Date: January 9th, 2019 1:10 PM Author: Slate electric center (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830797&forum_id=2#37559482) |